Australian UFO Photo: Saucer with Dome, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times
Topic started on 21-3-2010 @ 01:36 AM by Maybe...maybe not
G’day

One of the photos that first aroused my interest in the UFO phenomena was the W. C. Hall UFO photo taken in 1954 over a sheep station in Australia.

I remember looking at it in some old UFO books when I was very little & thinking…..”wow!”

Some well known UFO sites categorise this as one of their “all time great UFO photo’s”, including…..

UFO Casebook:


Australia, 1954. This very compelling photograph of a clearly defined round UFO with top and antenna was taken by sheep farmer W. C. Hall in 1954. If you look real closely, you might see another unknown object in the distance just above a mountain. An excellent photo, and for a newspaper clipping, it is in excellent condition.

www.ufocasebook.com...


Here are 2 different versions of the photo, both of which are not of particularly good quality:





I looked for an original place of publication of the photos & came up with this from Keith Basterfield’s “Project 1947” archives:


Oct 1953 North QLD
Mr W C Hall photographed a dense looking tropical hat shaped UFO of circular form with a prominent dome on top as it hovered over a herd of sheep.
(Sir magazine Feb 55.)

www.project1947.com...


I looked into archives I could find regarding “Sir Magazine”, but I could not find a Feb 1955 edition.

I looked into anything Bill Chalker (“The Oz Files” author) might have written about it, but that looped me back to “Project 1947”, where Chalker is now archiving his older material.

All in all, I have not been able to obtain much background material regarding this photo.

Therefore I would be very interested to know what the ATS community thinks about this photo.

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 01:41 AM by jumpingbeanz
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not



it kinda looks face because you cannot see anything kinda clearly and bam u can kinda see the saucer,, it doesn;t fit well with the rest of the pic


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 02:07 AM by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not


Isn't it interesting that it's referred to as a "tropical hat shaped UFO"?

Do we have enough information to rule out a tropical hat or something along those lines? (tossed in the air like a frisbee and photographed)?

Of course the fact that it LOOKS LIKE a topical hat doesn't mean it IS a tropical hat, but I'm not seeing anything to immediately rule out such a possibility.

You're right, there's not much information about this online. The picture is from a newspaper clipping, we surely have to wonder what ever happened to the original photo or negative, and did nobody ever have an interest in investigating this case further than clipping the newspaper article?

There's supposed to be a 2nd UFO visible in the background but I'm having a hard time seeing it.

www.eyepod.org...

Australia, 1954. This very compelling photograph of a clearly defined round UFO with top and antenna was taken by sheep farmer W. C. Hall in 1954. If you look real closely, you might see another unknown object in the distance just above a mountain. An excellent photo, and for a newspaper clipping, it is in excellent condition.



reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 02:10 AM by ventian
reply to post by Arbitrageur



If you look at the mountain range in the back, the middle mountain seems to have something above it but that could be anything really.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 02:27 AM by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by jumpingbeanz
reply to
post by Maybe...maybe not



it kinda looks face because you cannot see anything kinda clearly and bam u can kinda see the saucer,, it doesn;t fit well with the rest of the pic


G'day jumpingbeanz

I think what you might be describing is the apparent lack of distance haze, which would count against the photo being authentic.

On the other hand, one might argue the lack of pollution, etc...might minimise distance haze.

I note that at an initial glance, the lighting on the "object" seems to generally match up with the lighting on the sheep.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 02:34 AM by ventian
reply to post by Arbitrageur





It looks like there may be two there in the background but as our gracious hosts alias implies maybe...maybe not

My pic was shrunk a lil bit look where I marked to see it on the original.

[edit on 21-3-2010 by ventian]



reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 02:45 AM by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to
post by Maybe...maybe not


G'day Arbitrageur


Isn't it interesting that it's referred to as a "tropical hat shaped UFO"?
Do we have enough information to rule out a tropical hat or something along those lines? (tossed in the air like a frisbee and photographed)?


I’m not a big fan of the “flying tropical hat” hypothesis….I think the “object” has more metallic highlights & detail than would be the case with the hat scenario.


Of course the fact that it LOOKS LIKE a topical hat doesn't mean it IS a tropical hat, but I'm not seeing anything to immediately rule out such a possibility.


I agree.....the poor quality of the photo's does not make it possible to rule that out unequivocally.

On the one hand, I'm sure I recall seeing a better quality photo at some time in the past.

On the other hand, I cannot find one.

I could be getting confused with the 1966 Washtenaw County UFO photo's that I also used to look at for ages when I was very little......that "object" had a similar shape.


You're right, there's not much information about this online. The picture is from a newspaper clipping, we surely have to wonder what ever happened to the original photo or negative, and did nobody ever have an interest in investigating this case further than clipping the newspaper article?


Good question.....that's why I tried to track it down via the reference to "Sir Magazine".


There's supposed to be a 2nd UFO visible in the background but I'm having a hard time seeing it.

www.eyepod.org...

Australia, 1954. This very compelling photograph of a clearly defined round UFO with top and antenna was taken by sheep farmer W. C. Hall in 1954. If you look real closely, you might see another unknown object in the distance just above a mountain. An excellent photo, and for a newspaper clipping, it is in excellent condition.



I still think I saw a clearer photo because I think I can recall looking at that 2nd object in much more detail.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 03:02 AM by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by ventian



G'day ventian

Thanks.....that shows things well......from memory, I think the reference was to the lower "object".

As I said to Arbitrageur.....

I still think I saw a clearer photo because I think I can recall looking at that 2nd object in much more detail.

I might see if I can find an e-mail address for Bill Chalker to see if he has any comments about this photo.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:20 AM by InfaRedMan
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not



MMN,

I think you should contact Bill Chalker. He's a nice guy and was happy to help me out in the past with images.

Bills Email:
bill_c@bigpond.com


IRM


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:20 AM by ventian
reply to post by InfaRedMan



I believe that if it is real it is the lighting that is causing the contrast effect. Closely looking at the picture is a bunch of dots from the poor photography. The dots are white on the ufo in question and seem to match the pattern. I don't believe it is a copy paste though it shouldn't be ruled out.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:23 AM by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by InfaRedMan



G'day InfaRedMan

OK.....I just did that.....


From: Hunka Hunka
Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 19:35
To: 'bill_c@bigpond.com'
Subject: A Question About An Old UFO Case

G’day Bill

I hope you don’t mind me being so presumptuous as to e-mail you directly......I saw your e-mail address here: www.ufoinfo.com...
I am looking for a little background info regarding the W C Hall photo (attached & below).
I can get no further than references to it first being published in “Sir Magazine” in 1955.
This is one of the photo’s that first got me interested in this topic.....I recall looking at it when I was very young.
I also think I’ve seen a clearer photo.
Any info or pic’s would be appreciated very much.
If you are too busy.....then no worries, I imagine you get many such requests.

Kind regards
Hunka Hunka


I also asked The Great Internos & our second biggest Oz celebrity after you, Chadwickus.

Your U2U was loaded & ready to go!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 21-3-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:30 AM by ventian
reply to post by spearhead



Wouldn't mind knowing what camera he used. If it is moving that camera is great for stopping the blur. Can't help but wonder about those laws of gravity though. They could be right but knowing our primitive condition, I would bet there is a lot we still don't understand.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:44 AM by ventian
reply to post by NASA is ASAN



Preciate you comin in with the filters and what not. Have you by chance ruled out a hat?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 51 replies