It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Yeah those long posts that discuss jurisdiction and law can be pretty maddening and who here would expect an LEO to actually take the time to read an entire post? That would require more investigation than one invested with so much power should have to engage in.
Originally posted by rcwj1975
Originally posted by richierich
So a cop shows up and files a report for the homeowners insurance...and that makes him a hero?
Ahh gotta love the reports for homeowners claims...especially the people who ask for a report to file insurance claims and I have to explain to them that the damage done would cost $50 to fix, and their deductible is $500, so a report is useless. This of course is usually the mailbox calls...
If cops were patrolling neighborhoods instead of focusing on high youth and minority areas for big bust numbers maybe they would actually STOP a burglary before it happens...but that is as rare as hens teeth.
Burglars are caught in the act by cops ALL THE TIME. You just don't hear about it everyday because no one cares except the homeowner.
I notice no one had the nerve to refute my main point: Cops are MOSTLY willing to violate the law or rights to level the playing field, or whatever other excuse they use for illegal conduct.
The "nerve"....more like most of us are smart enough not to debate a lie with someone so narrowminded that will NEVER accept anything ever debated except his own words.
Originally posted by rcwj1975
reply to post by richierich
Again your using the word MOST....in your mind out of the 800,000 LEO's in the US, YOU believe 700,000 are bad, lying, abusive, power tripping nazi's....and that is simply wrong. So I don't need "gaul" to show you, as I said before, that your close minded and no matter what anyone says it will never be right, or be enough, or be sufficent, etc....in othere words, debating you is impossible because your not open to the possibility of being wrong about much, or hell ANY, of what you say.