I have you to share this idea with
Even if nobody wants to hear it

Wait, is this a poem? Fairly skillful.

But to answer your question... We call it a tragedy, a terrorist attack, and an example of tremendous stupidity on the part of intelligence agencies. Maybe they let it through on purpose; if I think that's a possibility, I might be a Truther technically. But, besides a few thing like that which indicate willing complacency on the part of the government, I agree with the OS. It was no false flag, and if there was a conspiracy it was only a conspiracy of inaction. I call it a Tragedy and a Terrorist attack.

Originally posted by Solasis
Wait, is this a poem? Fairly skillful.

But to answer your question... We call it a tragedy, a terrorist attack, and an example of tremendous stupidity on the part of intelligence agencies. Maybe they let it through on purpose; if I think that's a possibility, I might be a Truther technically. But, besides a few thing like that which indicate willing complacency on the part of the government, I agree with the OS. It was no false flag, and if there was a conspiracy it was only a conspiracy of inaction. I call it a Tragedy and a Terrorist attack.

Thank you for your compliment.
A poem in the 911 forum. Yes. That's weird I know
Sometimes I just rhyme.
Anyway, it's my 2cents.
A conspiracy of inaction is almost worse. I don't know which one's worse. I'm sure I'll put it to verse.
One of my theme's is actually realized, in what you've written in your reply. It's too hard to define.
People are lumping everyone into one big bunch.

Originally posted by dragonsmusic
The 911 Blooper?

I call them what they were: the 9/11 attacks.

What we have here is a failure to communicate, on the government’s part, wouldn’t you say?

No. The 9/11 attacks did not depend on what the government said or did not say. The evidence - independent of the government - told us everything we needed to know about what happened. Whether Al Queda's attacks could have been foreseen and the government been able to prevent them are debatable questions.

Originally posted by jthomas

Originally posted by dragonsmusic
The 911 Blooper?

I call them what they were: the 9/11 attacks.

What we have here is a failure to communicate, on the government’s part, wouldn’t you say?

No. The 9/11 attacks did not depend on what the government said or did not say. The evidence - independent of the government - told us everything we needed to know about what happened. Whether Al Queda's attacks could have been foreseen and the government been able to prevent them are debatable questions.

Attacks indeed. Attacks against like 3000 bodies and like tens of millions of minds. It was double blind and "they" went "all in"
But whoever "they" are "they" lost in my opinion.

A terrorist attack...

That was manipulated by elements of our own government & foreign ones for the sake of political, military, economic and social reasons & ambitions.

That was a nice rhyme BTW. You definately got the wordsmith skills.

[edit on 3/19/2010 by mikelee]

Originally posted by mikelee
A terrorist attack...

That was manipulated by elements of our own government & foreign ones for the sake of political, military, economic and social reasons & ambitions.

That was a nice rhyme BTW. You definately got the wordsmith skills.

[edit on 3/19/2010 by mikelee]

Thank you, mike
"Our own government and foreign ones for the sake of political, military, economic and social reasons and ambitions", you said.
Agreed. Such dark reasons .

Originally posted by dragonsmusic
So I'm either one or the other? lol
Just either one of those then, nothing in between? silly

The strategy of "us and them" is used to divide and conquer. Truther or OS believer, Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, it does not matter.

As long as people are busy fighting with their neighbors, those people are less likely to lift their thoughts.

I'm not sure of the definition of the word "Truther".

I don't believe the official story. I think some people in the government had prior knowledge and possibly conspired to allow the attacks to happen in order to financially and emotionally fund a war (Iraq).

Does that make me a "truther"? I don't know. I don't have a desire to make the truth come out. If it's going to stay hidden, it's going to stay hidden, no matter how much pressure the public puts on the government. But I REALLY don't believe the OS.

There was NO conspiracy , in 93 they tried to drive a truck full of fertilizer into the base of the towers they were stopped. These people tin foil hat time just because someone says paranoia doesnt mean its true. The buildings collapsed on themselves cause of the weight of explosions rotting out the building. Pretty soon they are going to come after you conspiracy theroists legally because 3,000+ people died, you know its not a joke or a massive consipacy WE made.