16,500 more IRS agents needed to enforce Obamacare , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 07:02 PM by jam321
reply to post by Romans 10:9



Revolt Because of healthcare?

You know, I may be against it, but there are many who are for it.

Why should Americans revolt over a split issue?

I don't even like the way Congress is trying to pass this bill. But even then, I give them the benefit of the doubt they are doing it legally. If not, then I expect a court to decide.

But I don't see why this issue should cause a revolt.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 07:34 PM by Romans 10:9
Originally posted by jam321
reply to
post by Romans 10:9



Revolt Because of healthcare?

You know, I may be against it, but there are many who are for it.

Why should Americans revolt over a split issue?

I don't even like the way Congress is trying to pass this bill. But even then, I give them the benefit of the doubt they are doing it legally. If not, then I expect a court to decide.

But I don't see why this issue should cause a revolt.


Hooah! Always loyal, huh?




reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 07:54 PM by EsSeeEye
reply to post by jam321



It's not so split when you ask whether or not people want the reform that's being presented currently. Most everyone wants some kind of reform, it's just the current plan that isn't very well-received.

One thing I can't really understand is why, after considering reconciliation and the deem and pass rule, lawmakers are still trying for this specific bill. It's obvious nobody wants to vote yes, because they'll likely be voted out if they do, so they're playing with the rules trying to find a way to do it anyway, when they could just... do something the people wanted, and stay in office while doing so.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 08:03 PM by jam321
reply to post by EsSeeEye



It's not so split when you ask whether or not people want the reform that's being presented currently. Most everyone wants some kind of reform, it's just the current plan that isn't very well-received.


I agree with the above. I am one of those. But I also know many people who are saying no, no, no but at the same time whispering yes, yes, yes.


One thing I can't really understand is why, after considering reconciliation and the deem and pass rule, lawmakers are still trying for this specific bill.


IMO, it is time. In a few months, many will be in reelection mode and don't want to deal with any controversial bill. They figure the public will forgive them on this one, just like the stimulus, once some months have passed by.

If they wait till after the elections, Congress won't have the same makeup. The dems are going to get hit because the economy is still in the dump.



reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 08:15 PM by ChrisCrikey
My understanding of the bill is that as of now no will will pay more than 2% of their earned income on health insurance...if it's more than that it will be subsidized. There is no mandate for employers who employ 30 or less people.

The so called Cadillac health insurance tax is for individuals who policies cost more than (now revised to $ 10,200) and $27,500 dollars a year for families. It's not a large tax but I think they ought to drop this.

The latest revisions have been very good, IMO, and there have been many in just the past few weeks and below I'll include a link to an easy to read and understand latest version of the bill. I bet you a lot of ATS readers are going to be subsidized and some of you may get health care for the first time in years. Salud.

No one should have to be put in the category of "subsidized" but a lot of you and your employers will be subsidized for the time being. Eventually I hope we get Medicare for all.

On a personal note, nothing is going to change much for me except that I won't be seeing friends die anymore of treatable illnesses, and yes, I have personally seen this happen twice, both were successful entrepreneurs, in their sixties but who got sick, became uninsurable and had not yet reached the golden age of 65.

This is so easy to read and current. If you haven't looked at the latest in this bill yet, you will note quite a few changes including that they are pushing the numbers up on that Cadillac insurance tax and will provide more subsidies to small businesses to help get everyone insured.

www.reuters.com...


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 08:22 PM by David9176
reply to post by jam321





I agree with the above. I am one of those. But I also know many people who are saying no, no, no but at the same time whispering yes, yes, yes.


Jam...you nailed it in that statement. People want to say no....but so many need help.

Peeps want help....yet all you will hear from "certain" networks is how people should suffer.

We need to fight for the middle class that once was. That's you jam. That's me. That's most everyone else on ATS who is seeing their livelyhood slip away.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 09:08 PM by timewalker
reply to post by Schaden


Unless you don't do what they say and buy the insurance. If not you get 2.5% tax penalty and fined $750 on top. Last I checked last week. They change it every day.

Just tax me 2.5% and give us all or nothing.


reply posted on 20-3-2010 @ 02:19 PM by timewalker
reply to post by lynn112

From what I understand, again it might have been changed now, but there is supposed to be a penalty fine for not providing insurance for employees and it is very much cheaper than the cost of the insurance to begin with.

In turn the companies will gladly pay the cheaper penalty and dump the insurance plan. Forcing all the employees to purchase the state insurance.
They know this will happen.

Like Pelosi said, they need to pass health care so the public can find out what's in it.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 04:12 PM by Someone336
reply to post by timewalker



Like Pelosi said, they need to pass health care so the public can find out what's in it.


Did Pelosi seriously say that? What a dolt.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 06:10 PM by timewalker
reply to post by Someone336


Yes she did. 3/09/10 - Tell us Pelosi get us out of the fog.



If you noticed she was not looking at the teleprompter when she said that. You see what happens when they actually go off script.

[edit on 21-3-2010 by timewalker]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 51 replies