What is on the inside/other side of a black hole?, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

Topic started on 19-3-2010 @ 05:42 PM by impaired

I'm throwing this in The Grey Area because it's only a theory I've been kicking around. It may even overlap a mainstream theory - I don't know. That's why I'm hoping to get a discussion going on this.

We all know how on Earth, everything that is biological recycles back into the Earth. Things decompose, go back into the ground, and then are used to feed plants, then animals, and then the cycle repeats.

I was thinking that perhaps a black hole does the same thing.

A black hole is a collapsed star that has run out of energy, and it sucks everything in that it can (well, we all know that). But what I'm thinking is that the "inside" is just the collection of the matter that has been collected - but it is packed to the maximum density possible in our world of physics...

Since matter can not be destroyed but only transferred, I believe this strengthens this theory.

Once the black hole runs out of its own energy, the super-compacted matter inside slowly decompresses and becomes part of the universe again in raw form (down to the atomic structure - EVERYTHING is broken down). Then it condenses to form stars (again), planets, etc... The cycle repeats.

According to this theory, there is no other dimension or parallel universe on the other side.

I'm basically inferring that Black Holes are the recyclers of the Universe...

Same with the super-massive black holes in the center of each galaxy - they would just work on a larger scale.

What do you guys think? Is this theory possible???

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 05:45 PM by EMPIRE

One of my science teachers told me a white hole.

ETA: That is what one of my teachers told me. That is not what I believe, or what I am stating as fact. Personally, I don't know.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by EMPIRE]

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 05:49 PM by Smell The Roses

Originally posted by EMPIRE
One of my science teachers told me a white hole.

Yeah that's the theory going around. Nobody can actually prove anything in regards to this since once something enters a black hole it can't escape. I don't buy the white hole theory tbh, but I have no idea where all the matter goes because that can't disappear, it can only be trapped.

"black hole is a region of space from which nothing, including light, can escape."

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 05:55 PM by altered_states

reply to post by impaired

Black holes are still only theoretical and speculation nobody knows anything about them they are the ultimate mystery of the universe, until we get close and take a look your question will be unanswered .

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:02 PM by CodenameDoeB

But if you do not know what is on the other side of the blackhole, How do you know theres not a force that can destroy matter?

Just a thought that popped up when u stated matter cant be destroyed, Nice theory none the less

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:11 PM by Allred5923

Originally posted by altered_states
reply to post by impaired

Black holes are still only theoretical and speculation nobody knows anything about them they are the ultimate mystery of the universe, until we get close and take a look your question will be unanswered .

Actually, your assumption's of the lack of knowledge for "Balck Holes" seems limited in your ideologies.

Astronomers have observed for the first time the entire life cycle of one of Nature's most powerful events as jets of energy emerge from a distant black hole, slow down while plowing through interstellar gas and then finally fade away.

Heres some more for your inquiry OP, it is a teriffic read, and it will lead you in the direction of "Theory" that need's to be understood to discuss this issue. Here's the website:

Life Cycle of Black Hole Emissions Seen for First Time
www.space.com...

Great discussion for the uninformed though!!!

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:22 PM by ThenThanCorrectionMan

Our lass is on the other end of a black hole.She eats non stop rubbish and weighs about 6 and a half stone.
On a serious note, the other side of a black hole is a white hole spewing old matter into new matter in an endless honeycomb structured multiverse.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by ThenThanCorrectionMan]

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:27 PM by ucalien

reply to post by impaired

What is on the inside/other side of a black hole?

The Necromonger Underverse...

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:32 PM by tgidkp

whats on the other side of a black hole?

you, of course.

what did you THINK would be there, silly?

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:34 PM by altered_states

Originally posted by Allred5923

Originally posted by altered_states
reply to post by impaired

Black holes are still only theoretical and speculation nobody knows anything about them they are the ultimate mystery of the universe, until we get close and take a look your question will be unanswered .

Actually, your assumption's of the lack of knowledge for "Balck Holes" seems limited in your ideologies.

Astronomers have observed for the first time the entire life cycle of one of Nature's most powerful events as jets of energy emerge from a distant black hole, slow down while plowing through interstellar gas and then finally fade away.

Heres some more for your inquiry OP, it is a teriffic read, and it will lead you in the direction of "Theory" that need's to be understood to discuss this issue. Here's the website:

Life Cycle of Black Hole Emissions Seen for First Time
www.space.com...

Great discussion for the uninformed though!!!

WOW that explains everything I need to know about black holes

Thank you so much Mr Einstein in your non limited ideology

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:40 PM by socrates271

Black holes are definitely just stars whose light wavelengths are different from our own.

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 06:40 PM by St Udio

reply to post by impaired

Once the black hole runs out of its own energy, the super-compacted matter inside slowly decompresses and becomes part of the universe again in raw form (down to the atomic structure - EVERYTHING is broken down). Then it condenses to form stars (again), planets, etc... The cycle repeats.

Isn't that just what supernovas do in their process of blowing up quickly?

i favor the notion that the supermassive blackholes of Galactic cores eventually become the Quasars of today,
the BH Quasar is busy squeezing out every quanta of energy out All of the matter caught in its Event which is forever becoming infnitely dense(er).

and then shooting that high energy gamma rays back into this universe -as seen in Hubble pics of galactic BHoles radiatings beams of energy from their polar axis'.

on the other side of the multi trillion solar mass BH, after the fabric of this universe 'snaps' from the density of all that exhausted matter/quanta/
(imagine an atom was like grape, then the BH takes & squeezes the grape & all thats left is the empty shell of the grape, while all the rich, tasty, wet meat of the grape is squirted into space) thats how a BH works with material of this universe... its a giant orb of squeezed/pressed/empty grape skins.... and all that garbage will break the sack its in and spill all over the neighboring universe as a 'Big Bang Event'

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 07:01 PM by ..5..

Oh Darn! Now I have to find that 79 nor 80 Disney movie and watch it to find out and tell you. As I recall it was bad back then.

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 07:20 PM by PhyroX

reply to post by impaired

I think... no, that theory can't be plausible. So far we only have a theoretical view of what is inside a black hole, and there is no way (yet) to check it.

There is some math theoretical "game" that "create" white holes, taking t<0 and the result would have no observable difference with a black hole, so maybe we are watching a black hole, maybe a white...

Anyway, we don't know how a black hole works, we can only see outside the event horizon, and suppose that inside are a singularity (prob we can't conceive it) with infinite density but they aren't recyclers... Some kind of destroyers... Small black holes tend to disappear, massive black holes tend to eat more to be MORE massive

And... matter can be destroyed... Energy can't. When a BH eats a galaxy or some massive star, it "puke" a HUGE amount of gamma ray, it's like recycling BUT we need something (big bang) that make matter from pure energy, so they aren't recyclers (by itself), but somehow the "glue" that holds everything together, and the most important... a very interesting bug in the space-time fabric! =D

Excuse my english (not my 1º language)

reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 11:57 PM by mrwiffler

reply to post by Allred5923

Your only siting the beliefs of astronomers who have faith in the existence of black holes. A circular argument to be sure. It is a much debated issue among experts in the field. Many don't believe in them at all. Here's some links for you:

Firstly, black holes are related to the big bang theory. Here's an article from New Scientist that shows the faith based nature of this theory:

www.cosmologystatement.org...

Here's the website. Very detailed, thorough and importantly, conservative challenges to the mainstream ideas about cosmology:

www.cosmology.info...

Pages: ^^TOP^^