Originally posted by bsbray11
reply to post by jthomas
I understand exactly what you are saying. You are trying to close the case on the government story as reported by the Kean Commission (and we have
all seen what the people behind that report have said about it since then), FEMA and NIST, by repeating over and over that it's such an unbelievably
massive amount of evidence that we don't even need to question it.
On the contrary. I wrote specifically:
"That's certainly your right to doubt the preponderance of evidence..."
And to ask for a reason just to for why we choose to question it at all? Because it's healthy to question your beliefs
regularly, jthomas, and see what evidence exactly they are or are not based on.
And I wrote:
"The fact that I, and most of us, have no doubts and have never been given valid evidence by you or the 9/11 Truth Movement and no valid reasons to
have any doubt whatsoever, does not work in your favor in getting anyone to consider WHY we would need yet another investigation."
And I asked you what yours are based on, specifically. And I asked for an evidence-based answer to one example of a question for a better
investigation to answer. But you are unable to provide that. The fact that you and no one else can show me what exactly was proven in the first
place is also a damned good reason to question everything that happened.
And I wrote:
"Nonetheless, if you cannot convince even me that you have any valid refutation of the largest, multi-layered, multi-discipline investigation in
history, much less be able to convey why anyone in the world should doubt the evidence, methodology, and conclusions, then who in the world do you
think you would EVER convince -- those experts who would want YOU to demonstrate WHY there should be another investigation?
"I really don't think you understand that the burden of proof falls squarely on your shoulders to demonstrate a cogent reason for another
investigation. That you don't like my answer is hardly grounds for yet another investigation."
To wit, it matters NOT that I think "explosive sounds" did not come from explosives but came from crashing elevators, fuel ignitions, shifting
girders, SOUNDS that none of us ever hear routinely. Unless you can provide positive evidence that explosives were present and used, or raise enough
concern that your "doubts" warrant anyone listening to you, you will NOT get another investigation. I have nothing to prove - YOU do. And you
haven't brought anything to the table that we skeptics of 9/11 Truth consider valid. That's just the way it is.
But we are listening and waiting, as we have done for the last 8 1/2 years.
Any further questions on this matter, bsbray11?