Why 404 a thread vs. Just closing it ?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 19-3-2010 @ 12:59 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
Dear ATS staff,


Two issues I want to address here, presented in order of priority.

1.

I was just reading the thread "breastfeeding is inappropriate" and get through page 1 and low and behold, I get a 404 screen. Now, this is not the first time that a "gray area" thread has been 404ed. For the life of me, I do not understand why a staff or a group of staff members find it justified to 404 a thread vs. just closing the thread. Other members, such as myself, may still want to read the information provided or contact the original poster via U2U to talk behind the scenes. With it 404ed, there is no way of doing either of the above.

Us ATS members logging in and showing up to this site gives ATS the business it needs to keep running. I think those who visit threads and are enthralled by the topic and then find out they cannot read it anymore get more than a little annoyed by such actions, such as 404ing. Actually, the only time I have ever wanted to leave ATS for good is because of such 404ing.

Information and the opinions of others are lost when this type of actions are invoked. So please, reconsider.

If the thread was just moved, then please disregard the previous words said above.

2.

More of a minor issue but still important, my U2U button is always red. Even if I click on it, it takes me to the "Board" address. If I click on it through member tools, I get the same effect. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

-UP-

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Unlimitedpossibilities]


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:23 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
reply to post by adifferentbreed



I think that is definitely possible. ATS staff are humans too. We all are a little bias or discriminatory.

Closing a thread show's, "ah. your thread seemed to get a bit our of control so we closed it." 404ing a thread is more like a punch in the face to enthralled readers.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:25 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
reply to post by LadySkadi



By any chance, do you know of the member's ATS name who authored the thread? I wanted to possibly contact him or most likely her.

I would U2U but as stated above, my U2U is malfunctioning.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Unlimitedpossibilities]


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:29 PM by SyphonX
I don't think I've ever been to a forums site whose policy is to send threads into the ether, instead of just locking and letting it die a slow archival death.

I find it incredibly ironic, and a bit disingenuous that "Above Top Secret", one of the foremost authorities on conspiracy communications, general paranoia and other things, and they operate by making threads "disappear" should a few mods disagree with it, or what have you. Very lame, very strange, and not appreciated by many of the users on this site.

For the most part, it serves no one by sending a thread into the internet ether, but in some rare cases, it actually benefits certain groups of people. One of the most common thread themes getting 404'd is anything to do with Israel/Palestine, and things of that nature. Some people get ridiculous, others just mildly bicker and argue, but when the thread gets 404'd, it actually removes all criticism of either proponent, giving a great "sigh of relief" to those who don't like their business being widely known.

Also, I don't appreciate the post deletions either, sometimes entire posts are removed for the most minor of infractions, and the thread is left with huge holes and mysterious exclusions of key pieces of information. However, I really commend and respect the mods that will remove offensive language or censor certain parts of a post, allowing the post to remain to avoid confusion. Again though, coming from "Above Top Secret", it's incredibly strange. It's like internet forum redaction, sans sharpie.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by SyphonX]



reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:35 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
reply to post by SyphonX



Aye Aye to that sir.

Sometimes one of the replies from a ATS staff member may be that the moderators are reviewing the thread "as a whole" in order to determine whether or not the thread should be reopened or stay closed. They 404 it of course during the review, but it should not stay 404ed if they decide to leave it closed. They should un404 it then keep it closed, still allowing information to be read by ATS members.

This is just what i have encountered and may not be true in all cases.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:41 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
reply to post by Maddogkull




Well some things that are inappropriate like drugs on the board, and hate speeches should be 404ed


Isn't that what T&C tag violations per post are for? Those are supposed to be the deterrents. 404ing a thread due to a 'few bad apples' who do not care about the information that is lost, should be reconsidered.

I agree with everything else you said.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:51 PM by Unlimitedpossibilities
reply to post by lspilot6946



The owners of the site OWN this site so they can form whatever policies they want. They pay for this address so basically they are entitled to do whatever they please. I respect that because if I were they, I may want to run the site a little differently or turn it into a sports forum or what have you. Yes, we members have power too, in large numbers, just like in the U.S., power in large numbers.

All I am asking is to not replace 'closing a thread' with '404ing a thread'. The two are very different actions in my opinion.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^