Giant shark's image projected

page: 1
49
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
+26 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:46 AM
link   
Gian Shark Image Projected

Appreciate this isn't directly UFO related however given all the talk around the ability of PTB to project powerful holographic images into the sky.

As such I thought this would be relevant for those that wish to see at least how advanced projection technology is be it holographic or otherwise

Best

Bravo




posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:53 AM
link   
I was going to say have you been watching Back To the Future 2 again but those are some smashing shots you linked to (they forgot the helicopter for the shark breaching shot though).

I'd recommend a move to the Tech forums as this is worth talking about but has hee-haw to do with either aliens or UFOs.

Nice find though and a big star and flag - seriously great shots.

Wish I could have seen them live.

-m0r



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Well done on the find S+F. I made a thread about this some time ago and although I provided many holograph examples, including Richard Branson's and the GE tech one at Universal, many still claimed those were not "real" holographs.

Janet and Chris Morris have some stuff to say about the governments use of this technology and its benefits to warfare.

Seems like to be they are getting more real and soon people will fully realize what we are capable of.

Remember just because they haven't announced something or shown you doesn't mean they aren't working on it or it already exists. I think the government has tons of operations that are much more involved than companies that are creating these holograms on display for marketing and entertainment purposes...


[edit on 19-3-2010 by Smell The Roses]


+9 more 
posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 11:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Smell The Roses
 


These are not holograms.
More water screen projections.



www.youtube.com...



[edit on 3/19/2010 by Phage]



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Smell The Roses
 



These aren't holograms.

Water is sprayed into the air and images are projected onto it. Still pretty cool though, there isn't a need to over exagerate.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:32 PM
link   
Dude, ufo related or not, that's just awesome



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
Awesome!! Big 'ol S&F! Something tells me that this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this technology. I'm sure there is a lab somewhere out there that can project images that would make these look like 8-bit N.E.S. games.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Bravo111
 


I know megaledon (spell?) became extinct near the end of the last ice age, this shot is very erie. It took me a year to go back in the ocean after I saw jaws. Good post but, I may not take another bath as long as I live.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:50 PM
link   
I remember hearing on the news that the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere has been increasing.

Hmm, wonder if they are creating a giant screen. Sorta like a big drive in movie theatre.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by 911stinks
 

Water vapor is transparent, it is invisible, it will not act as a movie screen.

A water screen uses a spray of liquid water, which is not invisible.
www.tsunamiscreen.com...



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 01:59 PM
link   
Those are facinating for sure. I did see some say that they were projected onto water droplets, so I guess if on could create enough atmospheric water dropplets in the sky they could do some very interesting VISUAL DECIEVING TO THE MASSES GREAT POST NON THE LESS ENJOYED THE PICS S&f.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by 911stinks
 


I was thinking the same thing

2nd

[edit on 3/19/10 by Ophiuchus 13]



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks
 

Water vapor is transparent, it is invisible, it will not act as a movie screen.

A water screen uses a spray of liquid water, which is not invisible.
www.tsunamiscreen.com...


Water vapor is visible in cold enough atmosphere, according to the "contrails turning into cloud cover is perfectly natural" crowd.

But, just in case you have a canned answer for that,


Citation
Ralph G. Eldridge, "Water Vapor Absorption of Visible and Near Infrared Radiation," Appl. Opt. 6, 709-713 (1967)
www.opticsinfobase.org...]

www.opticsinfobase.org...

and then you find this invention



Inventors: Mark A. Reichow Thomas F. LaDuke Christopher R. Runco Tom E. Brentnall
Agents: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC;C/O BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLP
Assignees: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.

Abstract:
The subject matter disclosed herein involves systems, methods, apparatuses or devices related to infrared imaging or infrared imaging projection.

Claims:

1. A method, comprising:illuminating a display with infrared radiation to at least partially obscure a displayed image otherwise viewable by an imaging device.

www.faqs.org...

You should really read the rest of the claims in the patent. Ahh, the wonderful world of Disney.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 02:42 PM
link   
reply to post by 911stinks
 

Contrails are not composed of water vapor, they are composed of ice crystals. That's not what you call a "canned answer", that's what you call a fact.

Yes, I know water vapor absorbs infrared radiation. What does that have to do with using water droplets as projection screen? And you do know that infrared is invisible, right?

Maybe you should have read more about the Disney patent:

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said display comprises a display screen;and further comprising, prior to said illuminating said display, placing an overlay over at least a portion of said display screen, said overlay being at least partially reflective of infrared light.


But what is really interesting about it is what its purpose is. Not to create a projection, but to prevent people from taking photographs of display screens and artwork.

[0005]It is becoming commonplace that at least one solid state imaging device is available to or is carried by each person that attends a venue, such as an entertainment complex, theme park, zoo, and museum. The proliferation of solid state imaging devices has impacted revenue generating services normally provided by the venue. For example, a museum may offer for sale photographs of artwork in the form of photo-books and postcards, but a visitor may be able to obtain high quality digital images of the same artwork using a solid state imaging device.

[0006]Another noteworthy example is the candid photo service offered at the point of exit of an attraction, especially such as those found at a theme park. It has become commonplace for theme parks to offer keepsake photos of the visitor experiencing, for example, a moment of high excitement on a thrill ride attraction. Upon exiting of the attraction, the visitor may be presented with a high definition display monitor displaying the candid image and an offer for sale of a photo of that image. It is becoming commonplace that instead of the visitor purchasing the candid photo, the visitor is simply capturing the image off of the display monitor using their solid state imaging device.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks
 


Maybe you should have read more about the Disney patent:

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said display comprises a display screen;and further comprising, prior to said illuminating said display, placing an overlay over at least a portion of said display screen, said overlay being at least partially reflective of infrared light.




Well, the technology is secret, so of course they are going to try to throw us off the trail.

But if you read carefully,


16. The method of claim 15, wherein said illuminating a fluid medium comprises: illuminating a vapor cloud.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein said illuminating a fluid medium comprises: illuminating a smoke cloud.

www.faqs.org...

[edit on 19-3-2010 by 911stinks]



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by 911stinks
 


If it is secret then why is it in your post on ATS?

Do you really think they will let secret info out into the public?



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 03:07 PM
link   
Great technology and find!

But I can clearly see a difference between this imagery and the photos and videos of 911 from different angles. One looks solid and real, the other looks fuzzy and transparent, if completely fantastic.

Notwithstanding the fact that the so called holograms are right over a water course with what appears to be a fountain system put in. You need a hell of a mist to make a hologram in the middle of the sky.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by 911stinks
 

The technology is not secret, it's explained in the patent. It works by projecting infrared radiation at the bootlegger's camera. The infrared is invisible to the eye so the observer can see the display but since most digital cameras are somewhat sensitive to infrared the display will be obscured. Pretty smart.

Some vapor clouds may be visible (LNG) and thus reflect light. Water vapor is not and does not.

Smoke is visible. Water vapor is not.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   
They do this at disneyland almost every night.



posted on Mar, 19 2010 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks
 


Some vapor clouds may be visible (LNG) and thus reflect light. Water vapor is not and does not.

Smoke is visible. Water vapor is not.



Rainbows ?





top topics
 
49
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join