Giant shark's image projected , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 49 times
Topic started on 19-3-2010 @ 11:46 AM by Bravo111
Gian Shark Image Projected

Appreciate this isn't directly UFO related however given all the talk around the ability of PTB to project powerful holographic images into the sky.

As such I thought this would be relevant for those that wish to see at least how advanced projection technology is be it holographic or otherwise

Best

Bravo


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 11:59 AM by Phage
reply to post by Smell The Roses


These are not holograms.
More water screen projections.



www.youtube.com...



[edit on 3/19/2010 by Phage]


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 12:28 PM by Berserker01
reply to post by Smell The Roses



These aren't holograms.

Water is sprayed into the air and images are projected onto it. Still pretty cool though, there isn't a need to over exagerate.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 12:54 PM by arbiture
reply to post by Bravo111


I know megaledon (spell?) became extinct near the end of the last ice age, this shot is very erie. It took me a year to go back in the ocean after I saw jaws. Good post but, I may not take another bath as long as I live.



reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 01:54 PM by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks

Water vapor is transparent, it is invisible, it will not act as a movie screen.

A water screen uses a spray of liquid water, which is not invisible.
www.tsunamiscreen.com...


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:00 PM by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by 911stinks


I was thinking the same thing
2nd

[edit on 3/19/10 by Ophiuchus 13]


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:18 PM by 911stinks
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks

Water vapor is transparent, it is invisible, it will not act as a movie screen.

A water screen uses a spray of liquid water, which is not invisible.
www.tsunamiscreen.com...


Water vapor is visible in cold enough atmosphere, according to the "contrails turning into cloud cover is perfectly natural" crowd.

But, just in case you have a canned answer for that,

Citation
Ralph G. Eldridge, "Water Vapor Absorption of Visible and Near Infrared Radiation," Appl. Opt. 6, 709-713 (1967)
www.opticsinfobase.org...]

www.opticsinfobase.org...

and then you find this invention


Inventors: Mark A. Reichow Thomas F. LaDuke Christopher R. Runco Tom E. Brentnall
Agents: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC;C/O BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLP
Assignees: DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.

Abstract:
The subject matter disclosed herein involves systems, methods, apparatuses or devices related to infrared imaging or infrared imaging projection.

Claims:

1. A method, comprising:illuminating a display with infrared radiation to at least partially obscure a displayed image otherwise viewable by an imaging device.

www.faqs.org...

You should really read the rest of the claims in the patent. Ahh, the wonderful world of Disney.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:42 PM by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks

Contrails are not composed of water vapor, they are composed of ice crystals. That's not what you call a "canned answer", that's what you call a fact.

Yes, I know water vapor absorbs infrared radiation. What does that have to do with using water droplets as projection screen? And you do know that infrared is invisible, right?

Maybe you should have read more about the Disney patent:
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said display comprises a display screen;and further comprising, prior to said illuminating said display, placing an overlay over at least a portion of said display screen, said overlay being at least partially reflective of infrared light.


But what is really interesting about it is what its purpose is. Not to create a projection, but to prevent people from taking photographs of display screens and artwork.
[0005]It is becoming commonplace that at least one solid state imaging device is available to or is carried by each person that attends a venue, such as an entertainment complex, theme park, zoo, and museum. The proliferation of solid state imaging devices has impacted revenue generating services normally provided by the venue. For example, a museum may offer for sale photographs of artwork in the form of photo-books and postcards, but a visitor may be able to obtain high quality digital images of the same artwork using a solid state imaging device.

[0006]Another noteworthy example is the candid photo service offered at the point of exit of an attraction, especially such as those found at a theme park. It has become commonplace for theme parks to offer keepsake photos of the visitor experiencing, for example, a moment of high excitement on a thrill ride attraction. Upon exiting of the attraction, the visitor may be presented with a high definition display monitor displaying the candid image and an offer for sale of a photo of that image. It is becoming commonplace that instead of the visitor purchasing the candid photo, the visitor is simply capturing the image off of the display monitor using their solid state imaging device.



reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:52 PM by 911stinks
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks


Maybe you should have read more about the Disney patent:
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said display comprises a display screen;and further comprising, prior to said illuminating said display, placing an overlay over at least a portion of said display screen, said overlay being at least partially reflective of infrared light.




Well, the technology is secret, so of course they are going to try to throw us off the trail.

But if you read carefully,

16. The method of claim 15, wherein said illuminating a fluid medium comprises: illuminating a vapor cloud.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein said illuminating a fluid medium comprises: illuminating a smoke cloud.

www.faqs.org...

[edit on 19-3-2010 by 911stinks]



reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:56 PM by Berserker01
reply to post by 911stinks


If it is secret then why is it in your post on ATS?

Do you really think they will let secret info out into the public?


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 03:11 PM by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks

The technology is not secret, it's explained in the patent. It works by projecting infrared radiation at the bootlegger's camera. The infrared is invisible to the eye so the observer can see the display but since most digital cameras are somewhat sensitive to infrared the display will be obscured. Pretty smart.

Some vapor clouds may be visible (LNG) and thus reflect light. Water vapor is not and does not.

Smoke is visible. Water vapor is not.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 04:11 PM by HappilyEverAfter
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by 911stinks


Some vapor clouds may be visible (LNG) and thus reflect light. Water vapor is not and does not.

Smoke is visible. Water vapor is not.



Rainbows ?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 12 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 51 replies