Originally posted by kozmo
BS! Saturn, if you "Like[d] truly conservative things" then you would be spending your time campaigning for a SMALLER federal government. Sorry, I
see right through your ruse!
Oh, and to add... Did you happen to notice the press release from the IRS that stated that they would need almost 100,000 more employees and a budget
increase of $10 BILLION dollars a year just to "police" this bill???
Scope creep already - less than 24 hours later. By my estimates, that is a $100 BILLION dollar cost increase in the first 10 years for only 6 years
of benefits!
Hmmm... I wonder what other hidden costs will come to light over the next year???
Did you see the CBO report?
Fiscal conservatism is not about government size...the so called "real fiscal conservatives" have proven time and time again that when they call the
shots, we get a massive increase in government spending and programs...typically in the name of defense.
Since Reagen, we have seen only expanding government and massive debt in actions...the only exception to this rule was Bill Clinton.
Thats the flat out facts.
You can argue the talking points all you want, but facts remain pretty clear. the far right neocons are for pro debt, pro expansion. This health care
bill will in fact reduce the debt...the biggest debt reduction measure since Bill Clinton.
Researchable by independent firms, and the only arguement against it are by neocons.
if it takes 10k people to save 138 billion over 10 years, or 1 trillion over 20, then great...sounds like a deal. more employment and savings,
whoot.
I want as Obama mentioned in his campaign...I want smarter government...responsible government. Size means jack...if I truely wanted a tiny
government, I would move to Nigeria or the Congo.
The hidden cost statement is a reflex reaction from the Bush administration when they truely were hiding the costs of war, of their medicare disaster,
etc.
and finally as far as the 6 year thing...right, these plans will be instituted over time and will really start kicking in in about 4 years. This has
been another talking point from the right...omg, even if it works, it will be 4 years from now...so lets not do it, because 4 years is too far ahead
and will never come.
get over it. Time the country starts looking at more than 6 month intervals...do we want cake and ice cream today or the longevity of our country as
a whole?
There is a good arguement that democracy/republics are not able to be stable for long because the people in general do not consider the future...only
what is happening at the very moment..which makes politicians cater to them