Despite the offensive tone of the OP, the topic is interesting.
I often post replies to dream threads. All my replies have the disclaimer that I don't
interpret other people's dreams.
Obviously, that is not the same as having nothing to say about another person's dreams. Symbolic thought is not something that everybody is equally
comfortable with. It is entirely appropriate, then, to talk things over with other people, the same as is it is appropriate to talk about other things
that happen, other problems you are working on, etc.
In any case, the remedy to BS is not different BS. For example,
Noone else has your subconcious, your experiences, or your life.
BS, unless of course you have evidence to back it up.
Jung is usually credited with observing that much of the contents of the unconscious are shared among people, even across time and cultural
differences. This is the so-called
collective unconscious, and my "copy" of it is, for any practical purpose, identical to your "copy," or
anybody else's.
Nor should this be surprising, given the obvious similarity in neural architecture within the species, and the visible similarities in the "template
biography" we all share.
If you want clarity, learn to lucid dream
Fine, but not everybody easily dreams lucidly, and not everybody wants to dream lucidly, more than they do spontaneously.
There is no reason to think that being aware that you are dreaming while you are dreaming improves the quality of symbolic thought. And as to
interpretation, the lucid dream web forums offer daily testimony that being aware of a dream while dreaming it does nothing for understanding.
But again, those are things that I had to find out for myself, noone else could tell me what my dreams meant for me.
Yes, ultimately the worker must do the work. That is no reason not to seek advice about how to do the work.
This is especially true of dreams with a high proportion of archetypal, collective unconscious, content. I can't imagine ever succeeding in
interpreting a dream which billions of others have dreamt over the several millennia for which we have records, without knowing that you are the not
the first to dream the dream.
And what you propose is worse than that. Not merely ignorance that a particular dream has been dreamt by billions, but the fantasy that on the
contrary, you are the only one, ever, and the source of this dream is what is unique about "your unconscious, your experiences, or your life."
Once you know that you are not alone, then it is reasonable, even common-sensical, to ask "What did these other people make of the dream that is the
same as mine?"
Of course, that doesn't mean these other people got it right. But it is difficult to see how ignoring others' experience improves your chances of
understanding, and easy to see how fantasies that you are the first will decrease your chances of understanding.
you must REALLY not know who you are.
There is nothing shameful about not knowing something. And this bit of shouting is hardly an argument for not seeking advice about what a dream has
shown you about who you are.
[edit on 19-3-2010 by eight bits]