It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phlynx
What really made me mad was the spot near the eye that looks like burning tears on the rabbit. Idiots like this woman make me beyond mad. IT also saddens me to see the world turning to this.
Originally posted by Paradox.
We can slaughter cows and chickens but not rabbits? Know what, if she had a team of lawyers like other corperations this would of never seen the light of day.
This is how it starts. You let your heart commit acts like this freely, and your mind will believe its okay. Some people have no conscience.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by freebourn
This is how it starts. You let your heart commit acts like this freely, and your mind will believe its okay. Some people have no conscience.
What some object to is the attitude that this woman should also be burned and tortured.
That is how it starts.
An eye for an eye. Reactions that are way out of proportion.
Frankly, I find that more disturbing than the animal cruelty.
And you fail to see the context of my reply to the poster that said that animals are never cruel.
I pointed out that nature is actually very cruel, obviously.
Like you said animals have no such reasoning of suffering
so how fair is it that the poster I responded to wants the woman to burn to?
Do you find that reasonable?
Do you have a problem with me objecting to that?
but people have become overly sensitive and emotional about animals, atrributing human emotions to them.
Uhuh, tell that to a lion's cub that's being killed by a hyena.
"It's Ok! It's not cruel!It has no choice!"
I understand it perfectly. The poster is correct.
I meant they cannot be aware of the suffering their natural behaviour causes, not that they dont suffer.
1. causing or inflicting pain without pity a cruel teacher
2. causing pain or suffering a cruel accident
I didnt say it was fair or reasonable, nor do I have a problem with you objecting to that. Im simply pointing out that your beleif that animals are crueler than humans is a fallacy, because their is no such intent in the animal kingdom, as I have tried to explain to you. You are anthropmorphising the hyena, with the human intent to be deliberately cruel, this is false. Do you understand now?
Exactly. You still dont understand that cruel is a human concept that dose not apply to animals. The lion cubs death is violent, but not cruel, excepting in your subjective opinion, and Im assuming your human.
1. causing or inflicting pain without pity a cruel teacher
2. causing pain or suffering a cruel accident
but people have become overly sensitive and emotional about animals, atrributing human emotions to them.
Note: "Willful", Not applicable to animals.
Cruelty is having reasoning and understanding of the suffering that will be caused and still choosing to do so.
You are atrributing human emotions/concepts to them, the human intent to be willfully cruel, this is your fantasy.
Show me a single example of an animal being willfully cruel and prove the animal is capable of human level rationale about it , is aware its behaviour is considered cruel by humans, and is choosing to do so explicitlyto be cruel, and ill conceed.