It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me to make the payment with and on top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying Me to pay that guy and who's paying that guy and so on...
Originally posted by daddio
Was it not man who created “government” to SERVE man? Not the other way round?
Originally posted by daddio
New auction date is July 1st.
Originally posted by daddio
Originally posted by daddio
New auction date is July 1st.
Well, July 1st came and went and no sale again. Have checked the county Sheriff's website for foreclosure info and am not listed nor is my property.
I do get calls from the mortgage company asking me to call them back so we can work this out, how funny, they steal your wealth and divinity and then beg you to continue when you find out the truth and set yourself free!!!
I just laugh.
Originally posted by daddio
Originally posted by daddio
Originally posted by daddio
New auction date is July 1st.
Well, July 1st came and went and no sale again. Have checked the county Sheriff's website for foreclosure info and am not listed nor is my property.
I do get calls from the mortgage company asking me to call them back so we can work this out, how funny, they steal your wealth and divinity and then beg you to continue when you find out the truth and set yourself free!!!
I just laugh.
So the new date was the 6th of July, nothing happened. Then they sent an appraiser to my home, I told him it was not for sale, it was private property and that it was held as collateral by the flesh and blood ME, the Agent for the "strawman" the state created, and that it was neither for sale or auction. I will be sending a letter to the Sheriff reminding him of his oath and of my rights under 42 USC.
We will see down the road.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by daddio]
Originally posted by Finalized
Been about a month since any update on this thread, just checking in to see what's going on on the foreclosure front.
I've been reading on and off about UCC for years, but have not had the courage to actually do it.
§ 5-109. Fraud and Forgery.
(a) If a presentation is made that appears on its face strictly to comply with the terms and conditions of the letter of credit, but a required document is forged or materially fraudulent, or honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant:
(1) the issuer shall honor the presentation, if honor is demanded by (i) a nominated person who has given value in good faith and without notice of forgery or material fraud, (ii) a confirmer who has honored its confirmation in good faith, (iii) a holder in due course of a draft drawn under the letter of credit which was taken after acceptance by the issuer or nominated person, or (iv) an assignee of the issuer's or nominated person's deferred obligation that was taken for value and without notice of forgery or material fraud after the obligation was incurred by the issuer or nominated person; and
(2) the issuer, acting in good faith, may honor or dishonor the presentation in any other case.
(b) If an applicant claims that a required document is forged or materially fraudulent or that honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant, a court of competent jurisdiction may temporarily or permanently enjoin the issuer from honoring a presentation or grant similar relief against the issuer or other persons only if the court finds that:
(1) the relief is not prohibited under the law applicable to an accepted draft or deferred obligation incurred by the issuer;
(2) a beneficiary, issuer, or nominated person who may be adversely affected is adequately protected against loss that it may suffer because the relief is granted;
(3) all of the conditions to entitle a person to the relief under the law of this State have been met; and
(4) on the basis of the information submitted to the court, the applicant is more likely than not to succeed under its claim of forgery or material fraud and the person demanding honor does not qualify for protection under subsection (a)(1).