Good analysis, basically supports other evidence of the genius of Kubrick.
I would highly recommend Jay Weidner's analysis of the Shinning and
the Apollo moon landings, (he maintains Kubrick was saying that they never
happened and makes a strong convincing case in his analysis of the shinning).
Wiedner states that Kubrick helped the US fake the landings.
His analysis of 2001 another Kubrick film, basically exposes quite
strongly that the methods used to shoot the footage of the Apollo moon
landings matched precisely Kubrick's revolutionary shooting techniques;
that only he could duplicate.
That is my understanding of Weidner's thesis on both of these films,
the shinning which was Kubrick telling us without endangering himself
to death by the usg, that the landings never occurred, the symbology
is no coincidence and after Weidner's analysis one cannot but see
the movie in an entirely different light.
Weidner has also written I believe about eyes wide shut,
but I don't recall the analysis at this moment,
it is located in the articles by him posted at the links below.
Like I don't get the alchemical Kubrick thing.
I would be very interested in you folks' input after you read his articles.
"no such thing as coincidence, no such thing as conspiracy theory,
just conspiracy fact. the whole of human history is one giant conspiracy!"
- someone must have said that
"man will never be free until the last banker is strangled
with the entrails of the last politician and priest" - Diderot