reply to post by jumpingbeanz
Jumping Beanz.
There is no no-nonsense absolute objective proof of these theories. That is the truth.
However, the more that you examine the world we live in, the more you will see that there are institutions that we ought to trust that we cannot.
That our governments are in collusion with corporations who are willfully suppressing knowledge and technologies that would uplift the human race.
That globally, markets and financial systems are being manipulated, that wars are being fought without rational cause that there are a select few who
are in the great power positions of this world.
The more that you examine these and other notions, ask yourself: To what end? For money? Those who have the most have enough to last countless
generations. For Powers? It seems to me that they already have that. You will find yourself increasingly confused.
Now examine the secret societies (freemasons, skull and bones, illuminati etc) Without question, these institutions exist, and they exist
specifically to control the dissemination of information throughout history, to withhold it from some, and impart it to others...at their sole
choosing. But to what end?
Those nutjobs who claim that the illuminati are exposing themselves in movies and in architecture, music and the media are right. Symbolism is
everywhere. But to what end? A practical joke? To what end?
Crop circles (and now snow circles) in dizzyingly exotic designs exist, many are man made, some seem not to be, but even if they are all man
made...ask yourself to what end?
Understand that there seems to be a concerted effort to confuse people, people like you an people like me. Ask you self again, to what end?
Most of these facts make little sense all by themselves, so start trying to put them together, to make the logical leaps that will be necessary, to
search and search and search.
As long as you keep asking yourself "to what end", you will eventually begin to draw a conclusion. Perhaps then you will understand what I believe,
perhaps not.
Kind Regards,
Tamale.
edit: In deference to the previous poster, I am not knowledgeable of Phil Schneider's work and cannot speak to his credibility, however I understand
the essence of his conclusions and many of them are shared by many other people with varying levels of credibility.
[edit on 18-3-2010 by Tamale_214]
