Electricity prices to rise by up to 64%, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 17-3-2010 @ 10:52 PM by wycky

Electricity prices to rise by up to 64%


news.ninemsn.com.au
The NSW opposition has called on the government to reject an independent determination to hike electricity prices by up to 64 per cent, saying the increase will be too much for some struggling consumers.

Electricity bills in NSW will soar over the next three years, with the state's Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) blaming the federal government's proposed emissions trading scheme (ETS) for much of the increase.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
southern-courier.whereilive.com.au[/u rl]

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
[url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread550434/pg1]The Solar Panel Conspiracy



reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 05:27 AM by daddio
reply to post by wycky





The Promissory Note To Pay Our Debts

HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 is the promissory note (the promise of Abraham) the government issued to balance the exchange to credit the people. The Promissory note is on the debit side of the United States Governments ledger, which was a debited from their credit, created by the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 when they took the gold out of circulation. Public Policy is rooted in HJR-192 and is Grace that creates our exemption. This is your temporal saving grace. Under grace, the law falls away to create a more perfect contract. Public Policy removed the people's liability to make all payments by making a contract null if it required the payment to be in substance, because the people didn't have any money to pay with. All that must be done now is to discharge the liability. Pay and discharge are similar words but the principles are as different as Old and New Testaments. The word "pay" is equated with gold and silver, or something of substance like a first-born lamb, which requires tangible work to be invested in it to remove the liability because an execution must occur. The word "Discharge" is equated with paper, or even more basic, simple credits and debits, that exist on paper only, like the slate held by the agents/angels of heaven that get swiped clean.

You cannot pay a bill with a bill and you cannot pay a debt with a debt. What HJR-192 did was, remove the liability of an obligor (someone obligated to pay a debt) by making it against Public Policy to pay debts. All that needs to be done now is discharge the debit with an appropriate credit "dollar for dollar." Debt must be discharged dollar for dollar in the same sense, as sin was discharged on the Cross. The moment a debt exists, it must be written off. The catch is, we can't write off the debt because we are not in possession of the account in deficit; our fiduciary agent is in possession of the account so we must provide him with the tax return (by the return of the original offer) so the fiduciary can discharge the liability through their internal revenue service (the bookkeeper). Most feel that when the money was taken out of society, the people became the slaves, this is not true, the people were freed from every obligation that society could create thus freeing the people from any obligation which they may incur simply because we cannot pay a debt. Ask yourself the question, What are you charging me with? And how do you expect Me to pay?

Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me to make the payment with and on top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying Me to pay that guy and who's paying that guy and so on... Public Policy is the supercedious bond because it limits our liability to pay. It is the more perfect contract because it operates on grace to pay our debts after we have done all that we can. We go as far as we can to fulfill the obligation (acceptance and tax return) and after we have done all we can, mercy and grace kick in being our exemption to make the payment. Grace creates our exemption in the industrial society so long as we accept the charge.



From;

loveforlife.com.au...



Now this, HJR-192, applies to America, but the site is from Austrailia I believe? So wouldn't this apply there too. Maybe some research needs to be done, but I think that if the people were to "Accept for value", the electric bill and "Return it for Discharge", that may stop this whole "Elitist" agenda and swing the power back into the hands of the people? No pun intended. I know there are many people who have actually petitioned the Queen for sovereignty. Not sure how that works but I do know that most countries are still under British rule, even America, believe it or not.


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 05:42 AM by jinx880101
reply to post by wycky



Hey.

Where do you live, if I may ask?

The same thing is happening in South Africa. The prices just keep going up. I don't understand what for? Eskom, which is the provider, keeps cutting power throughout the winter. Last winter, thousands of businesses lost millions in revenue due to the lack of knowledge and black empowerment which has caused problems at Eskom. & the tax payers just have to keep on forking out money to pay for their screw ups.

They have warned us that this coming winter will be worse.

Salaries in South Africa are one of the worst in the world. Increases in pay are scarce, whilst the increase in basic necessities keep sky rocketing.


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 05:44 AM by jinx880101
reply to post by canUhandlethetruth





I seriously believe if the governments are really serious on helping the environment, that they should really look into this clean energy, that Tesla had invented, then got thrown out the door, because there was no money in it. I mean seriously they make enough money from every thing else. Oh sorry, then there wouldn't be no reason for oil and fossil fuels and coal, which then I guess that means there goes 1 reason for no more war on oil, which then I guess the only thing they need to fight about is religion. Oh then I guess they wont make enough money because they are only fighting about one thing instead of two. But I am not happy about them rising the price on something we all need, Maybe its time to start living off the land again, not worrying about taxes and buying material things hehe, and surviving on my own. Gee I wonder what would happen then if they force everyone to live like this again, all because they can't afford to live like the people at the top. Wouldn't they eventually go under then? because not enough money getting circulated. Maybe they have not thought that far yet, lol. Oh that's right I forgot again, It only when it happens they will worry about it, like everything else.



canUhandlethetruth for president!!!


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 05:50 AM by Retrovertigo
reply to post by wycky



Awesome

If it happens in NSW I'm sure we'll be next in Victoria...And the argument about infrastructure is a crock...

If you remove the POSSIBLE increase due to an ETS of around 20%, which is unlikely to happen unless the Government gets some sort of miracle by way of a majority in the Senate at the next election, an increase of around 44% over 3 years due to "infrastructure costs" is simply theft by the electricity companies...

Privatisation of electricity companies in NSW & Victoria was a huge mistake...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 3 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 10 days ago with 37 member flags