Automatic v. Semi-Automatic?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 10:15 PM by rcwj1975
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to
post by rcwj1975


So, what you're saying is that Rambo isn't real?





ha...oh he is real. He is alive and well in our hearts. Matter of fact I may have to watch him on DVD soon now that you mention him.

By the way...when I was at Ft. Benning I qualified on the M60 and did the classic Rambo 1-arm firing. I can tell you this, without the underarm U-frame stock attachment, your NOT going to hold that 60 long with 1 arm while firing....


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 10:47 PM by oppaperclip
Originally posted by Beinion
Originally posted by oppaperclip


I'm pondering hypothetical scenarios (I do that quite a bit), more for "the fun of it" than anything else, though I would think that pondering such things could have practical applications as well.

My experience with weaponry is fairly limited to standard hunting weapons (.30-06, .308, .410, .22, .357, .38, 12-gauge, 20-gauge). In the scenarios I'm pondering it would be more likely that I would be attacking, though it would also be necessary to defend in case of being "flanked".

I'm a creative writer, and like for my stories to have an element of realism for the widest audience possible. I don't want a Marine charging into a firestorm with a .22 revolver and cleaning out Fallujah single-handedly, y'know? "Yous guys is good, but I don't think yous that good."

reply to
post by rcwj1975



That's exactly the kind of feedback I'm looking for. Thank you! More opinions are welcome, of course.

[edit on 17-3-2010 by Beinion]


I would have to agree with rcwj1975 that a semi auto, would probably be better for your intended purpose. An assault on a position, with a light unit, that is trained, I would say full auto. However for a defense with only non crew served weapons I would want the controlled fire of the semi auto.

Then it depends on what your enemy is coming at you with, and the type of terrain or building. Your attack/defense depends on there capabilities. The SMG is excellent for violence of action maneuvers such as mout.

But if you are going to attack and defend meaning no immediate extraction from you target location, or covert extraction you will need a mix of SMG and rifle rounds. 1/2 to 2/3 should have smg with a back up. This is assuming you are trained or you are a civilian trying you little heart out.

Movement to contact or ambush will require bigger ammunition, once again depending on terrain. With an ak47 or m16 the distance for accuracy and penetration power should be considered. You'll get more dist from and m16 and accuracy at greater dist. An ak47 auto or semi will require you to suck the enemy in closer, but the payoff is more penetration.

If you had to choose the weapon system and stick with it, you would then have to develop you strategy based on the weapon system.

If you go with full automatics you will want to also bring the "enemy" in close or advance with stealth or speed. Hit hard and fast and get out. Defense should be in a limiting terrain.

Semiauto weapons usually have a longer standoff distance. The advantage being you can harass your enemy at a distance. Waiting for an attack at distance 2-300 meters you can attack and defend with accuracy. CQB is not as efficient wit semiauto rifles, pistols would be better.



reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 01:05 AM by Binder
reply to post by Aliensdoexist



I couldn't agree more aliens. I have been preaching this for 2 years while everyone runs out, and spends exorbitant, hyper-inflated prices for super sexy pistols, and AR15s, while pretty much ignoring the "garden hoe" of CQB. That if it hits the fan close quarters in your own home, and the fear, and adrenaline is flowing you won't want to futz around with a fancy pistol, or rifle. The pump shotgun is so simple, and elegant in design, even a novice can operate it easily in a bad situation, and the stopping power is unparalleled. Also you are dead on about the psychological effect. Even a marine in a turtle suit would not want to be at the loud end of a 12 guage in close quarters, and that ominous Cha-chunk sound is universally recognized in the most primitive parts of the brain as "emminent death" if I continue to pursue a course of action agains this person.
I also agree with other posters that full auto use outside of suppressive fire, or fire for effect is pretty much just a fun waste of ammo.


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 08:58 AM by DOcean
I'm kinda surprised that someone actually asked this question. The difference between semi and full auto should be obvious. One shoots one bullet per trigger pull, the other shoots until you release the trigger or run out of ammo. The ammo is the same, so the stopping power is the same unless you manage to land multiple rounds from an automatic weapon. If you're asking the question, you likely can't.
Also, if you're asking the question, and truly don't know the difference, automatic weapons are likely illegal where you live. You'll have to go to the streets to find something automatic, or buy a semi and convert it to auto, something else you likely won't be able to do.
Also again, if you were to get your hands on something that had automatic capabilities, you'll likely have a selector on the gun to switch from semi, full, or burst (depending on the gun), so you can choose for yourself which you like best. But again, if you're asking the question, it's probably best to leave the home protection to someone slightly more qualified until you take some classes.

And to those here who are recommending a pump shotgun as the be-all-end-all for personal protection, while the sound of the rack is intimidating, riddle me this...

Say you hear a strange noise in the night, something that shouldn't be there. The little wifey urges you to get out of bed and check it out, so you get out of bed in just your boxers and lumber over to the closet to fish out the handy Winchester or Mossberg pump shotgun that you keep hot and ready to go. You stand in your upstairs bedroom doorway, listening. You hear the sound again, and seeing as you have that massive, intimidating piece of personal protection in your hands, you holler out "I'll give you ten seconds to leave this house, I have a gun", and rack a shell into the chamber, just for effect. You hear footsteps and see a shadowy figure run across your field of vision so you fire off a round, spreading buckshot across your living room wall. Maybe it wasn't your living room wall, maybe all of those pellets just imbedded in, or penetrated the wall of your childs room. Not two seconds later, the intruder comes out from cover and pulls the trigger five times, sending five .40 caliber bullets your way...all without cocking a hammer or racking a pump...all before you can even think of re-racking that shotgun.

-OR-

Take that same scenario and say in your fear or nervousness, you forgot to even rack the shotgun in the first place. Someone appears at the end of the hall. You pull the trigger and "click". Nothing. You just became mortally wounded or dead.

A shotgun is great, and intimidating, if used properly. But for the average person who isn't a gun expert, doesn't hunt, or doesn't spend countless hours on the range the least amount of moving parts necessary is best.
Take a semi-auto pistol. It's the same each time, and the work done to get ready for business can be done before the danger is imminent. Insert magazine, rack slide and go. You have 5-10 shots at your disposal and all you need to do is pull the trigger. Take a hammerless or a revolver that doesn't require a hammer pull...at least 5 shots without interaction.

A shotgun with buckshot is great because of the spread, but in that second or two required to re-rack, a lot of bad things can happen.


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 04:54 PM by Aliensdoexist
Originally posted by DOcean

Say you hear a strange noise in the night, something that shouldn't be there. The little wifey urges you to get out of bed and check it out, so you get out of bed in just your boxers and lumber over to the closet to fish out the handy Winchester or Mossberg pump shotgun that you keep hot and ready to go. You stand in your upstairs bedroom doorway, listening. You hear the sound again, and seeing as you have that massive, intimidating piece of personal protection in your hands, you holler out "I'll give you ten seconds to leave this house, I have a gun", and rack a shell into the chamber, just for effect. You hear footsteps and see a shadowy figure run across your field of vision so you fire off a round, spreading buckshot across your living room wall. Maybe it wasn't your living room wall, maybe all of those pellets just imbedded in, or penetrated the wall of your childs room. Not two seconds later, the intruder comes out from cover and pulls the trigger five times, sending five .40 caliber bullets your way...all without cocking a hammer or racking a pump...all before you can even think of re-racking that shotgun.





Well for me the answer to this is simple, I live by myself and no kids and also have a brick home so overpenetration isn't a big issue with me. Also there is no need to re-rack another round in the chamber unless there is multiple intruders, if you hit an intruder in center mass with "000 Buckshot", they are down period even if they have a bulletproof vest although it may not be lethal but it will break quite a few ribs and knock the wind out of the intruder and the shock of that would take quite a bit to be able to get back up.

Your scenario that you have laid out goes for all guns not just shotguns thats why when choosing Home Defense ammo you need to consider overpenetration especially if walls are thin, kids present, neighbors house is close to yours and so on. If thats the case then Frangible ammo is the way to go because the bullet breaks up on impact. Also people that are not experienced with guns should never even use or attempt to use a gun unless they are well versed on how to properly handle it. Semi-Auto shotguns jamb frequently depending on the shell i have a Remington 1100 semi-auto and it collects dust because clearing the shell after a jamb is a pain yet my Remington 870 pump has not once jambed on me and I've put well over 1,000 shells through it. Most of the time simple is better with any mechanical device, and in a life or death situation simple is most definatley better.


reply posted on 19-3-2010 @ 02:42 AM by Ridhya
reply to post by zaiger


An automatic glock would be useless anyway. Thats why 18C is
select-fire... so you have standard glock with option of automatic fire, and even then its only for 'storming' and even then very useless. What good is firing 17 or 19 rounds in 1 second, when you could fire 2 well placed shots...

Then they say 'thats why theres a 33rd mag' but thats a complete load, what a waste and heavy too. If you're going to use that might as well use a submachine gun as they are far more accurate.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hello again preppers and survivalist. Life changing reality.
  Posted 8 days ago with 30 member flags
Get some Magnoplasm Paste for your first-aid kit.
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
Hobby or Second Income Homemade Soaps, Sundry, and Remedy Recipes
  Posted 14 days ago with 19 member flags
Americans Buy 10,800,000+ Guns in 2011
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags