I really must apologize for getting off on such a wrong foot here. First of all Yahweh hasn't approved of a Pagan speaking for him.
DT 13:1 If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, 2 and if the sign or wonder
of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, "Let us follow other gods" (gods you have not known) "and let us worship them," 3 you must not
listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. Yahweh your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your
soul. 4 It is Yahweh your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him. 5 That prophet
or dreamer must be put to death, because he preached rebellion against Yahweh your God, who brought you out of Egypt and redeemed you from the land of
slavery; he has tried to turn you from the way Yahweh your God commanded you to follow. You must purge the evil from among you.
DT 13:6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, "Let us go
and worship other gods" (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of
the land to the other), 8 do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. 9 You must certainly put him to
death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone him to death, because he tried to turn you
away from Yahweh your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 11 Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you
will do such an evil thing again.
A prophet is someone who presumes to speak for some god or other. It's obvious a Pagan would be inclined to mention gods other than Yahweh. But
let's not think about this particular existential threat for a while. It's only one guy we're talking about, and it is better for one to die than
that the whole nation should perish. Isn't it? Human sacrifice is good. Yes? No? Whatever?
I thought long and hard (
pun intended, cue laghtrack) about this stoning business. What exactly is the image being symbolized? It's obviously
a religious ritual meant to show some deep spiritual meaning beyond the obvious 'deterrent effect' mentioned in verse 11 above. I have reached a
tentative conclusion which I will dramatize in story:
The Earth Rose Up
A child (one who still asks questions) was on his way out of town to gather firewood. As he neared the gate he heard the shouts from many voices and
one pleading, "No, please, don't do this!"
Thinking some innocent person had been set upon by robbers, the child ran toward the ruckus, thinking to be of some help. But as he neared, the din
had died down. Upon arriving he saw a group of men surrounding a figure lying motionless on the ground, stones scattered haphazardly around. (Note: I
use the term figure because it shouldn't be implied that this was once a living breathing human, especially not a woman or child)
The child demands, "What have you done?"
The men reply, "We are guiltless, this was an abomination."
"What have you done?"
"We have done nothing. The earth rose up and smote the abomination."
"What?"
"Yes, the abomination was polluting our holy land."
"What?"
"Unless the land is pure we will be cast off."
"And now the land is pure?"
"Yes, the land is pure, and we are safe."
"Why is the land drinking the blood then?"
------------
Before we go on, let's think about that for awhile. (suitable pause)
Okay, I know what the objections are. "But pthena", you say, "That's not human sacrifice. That's execution for crime. It's not the same."
I ask then, "What's the difference?"
You reply, "A proper human sacrifice must be spotless, not a criminal. ... Hey, wait a minute, you tricked us into talking about human sacrifice!
You, pthena, are evil to trick us into discussing proper human sacrifice. We don't believe in that stuff. It's you Pagans who do such
wickedness."
Okay, there will probably be no end of disagreement about who does or doesn't believe in human sacrifice. So maybe we'll shelve that for now and
move on to existential threats. You know, the reason tossed out so blithely as justification for war. I'm quite certain war has nothing whatsoever to
do with human sacrifice. Such wise statements come to mind, such as, "we're fighting them over there, so that we don't have to fight them here."
It's all self defense, it's just, it's necessary because of the existential threat. We have to survive after all. It's mandatory. And if 30
innocent people die for every threat eliminated, well that's acceptable. But that's not human sacrifice. It can't be. We don't believe in it,
therefore nothing we do, including killing women and children by the thousands, can be called that. See, doesn't exist. Well, unless some one else
does it. Then, and only then, is it human sacrifice. See, only others do it. Because they are ignorant of high religions that deny it's existence.
See how simple it becomes once you have a superior religion?
Okay, sorry, slipped into that subject again. We really must move on.
[edit on 24-3-2010 by pthena]