The Wall Street Journal gives a nice like article on where
the bill currently stands. This article was written almost as simple to understand as a USA Today article, but it does skip the heavy drama
associated with the bill.
Originally posted by LaMadameDuval
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Dear OutKast - I think that with the millions of dollars spent for advertising in campaign ads and the cost of the advertisers/image makers to develop a candidate (notice how that our last 3 presidents came out of relatively nowhere?),
Originally posted by junglejake
reply to post by maybereal11
It looks like I might be mistaken about the health care aspect.
[..........]
My bad!
Originally posted by junglejake
I do think the question is one we still need to consider, though. Currently, the only things the house and senate can vote on without the public being privy to their votes is items classified due to national security.
Originally posted by junglejake
However, it really seems, if you follow the discussions many politicians are having, that health care reform is more important than anything else, and we stupid Americans can't be trusted to make the decision as to what's best for us.
The new plan is to do a blind vote for health care.