are " un-repeallable " laws , legal ? , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 16-3-2010 @ 11:47 PM by ignorant_ape
hi , my observance here , in the thread about the abolition of the australian death penalty , concerns me more than any debate about the merits or demerits of capital punishment

i will state it again -

they [ the current parliament ] have enacted a law that they claim cannot be reppealled by ANY future legislative assembly

that is simply wrong on EVERY level

just think of what a corrupt majority could acheive , and never have its work undone

this IMHO is a far more serious issue for ATS to chew on than any debate about wether australia should / should not have a capital punishment option




[edit on 16-3-2010 by ignorant_ape]


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 02:34 AM by Glencairn
There was something like that here in the U.S. on page 1020 of the senate health bill. An article on "The Atlantic" web site talks about why process is important and gets into the issue on page 1020 of the Reid bill that attempts to prevent future Congresses from altering bits of the legislation.

From Senator Jim DeMint's comments on the section:
There's one provision that I found particularly troubling and it's under section c, titled "limitations on changes to this subsection." and I quote -- "it shall not be in order in the senate or the house of representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection."


So, it looks like governments are doing whatever they can to have their own way and make changing their decisions as hard as possible.

Take care,
Cindi

Pages:     ^^TOP^^