reply to post by villagesmithie
The "Health Matrix" study has been exposed for its bias and flawed analysis here and in the mainstream. It is not a valid statement of the
nature of foreclosures or bankruptcies.
We need the regulations in place to provide us with the health care we all need at some point and we need a system that doesn't bankrupt
individuals when we do.
I agree that for-profit businesses have a place in the system. We do not need more "regulations .. to provide us the health care we need."
Government "regulations" that favor one segment of an industry, or society, over another are precisely why we are facing housing, banking, and
health care crises.
Some Americans already belong to or participate in a "system that doesn't bankrupt individuals." It is called "consumer-driven health care."
Are you opposed to letting consumers of ANY service (and especially health care) have control of the basic transactions and decisions? Do you REALLY
think your government representatives know what is best for you, or that they will do it if they did?
I believe our current model does a poor job of providing that. Your scare word "socializing" may be exactly what we need.
"Socializing" is not a "scare word;" it is inefficient, unfair, and gravitates to the lowest common denominator for the "greater good." It
necessitates lowered standards (one size fits all) and over consumption (I want everything everyone else is (perceivedly) getting) from a limited
amount of resources..
We ALL need to pay in we ALL should have coverage. ... It would keep our population healthier and more productive. It would strength our
ability to compete in the world market and strengthen capitalism.
This is a non-sequitur. Guaranteeing everyone anything does equate with better health or productivity. It actually eliminates incentive for
improvement and encourages trust that "'the system' will take care of us."
Those who can afford to, should be able to make their own health care choices. Those who cannot, should be afforded the means to do so, or provided
access to the services directly.
jw
p.s.: Google or investigate "consumer-driven health care" and tell me what is wrong with the concept, if you can
[edit on 17-3-2010 by jdub297]