posted on Mar, 17 2010 @ 08:35 PM
Originally posted by stealthyaroura
I have this belief that the people who live in and around Egypt at present cannot truly be called or classed Egyptian!
i think Arabian may be a better fit.
But Egypt isn't that close to Arabia. Egypt is in Africa.
to me the past history of the hieroglyphs and the pyramids do not belong to a current bloodline that exists by those who occupy that
region.
Why not? Egypt and the Middle East have the oldest written histories in the area -- the Arabians did not have writing until far later and they never
built any big monuments. Greeks and Romans saw them writing in hieroglyphs and demotic script. Greece ruled Egypt for well over 300 years.
This is what i believe that Dr Hawass probably knows deep down and is totally misinterpreting everything he finds and documents,
Egyptology didn't begin with Hawass. It's been around since the 1700's. The contributions of Hawass are only a very very very tiny fraction of
all the things written about Egypt by Egyptologists.
i think the man needs bringing down a peg or two! The fact that only his close colleges can dig or explore and document new findings only strengthens
my case that the egyptians were totally different people all together.
Yes the same can be said for a lot of civilisations but this stands out to me, there interpretation of the pyramids as tombs and nothing else
is narrow minded,
In spite of the fact that they've found mummies inside coffins in many pyramids? And that tombs of the nobles in their cemeteries are in the shape
of small pyramids? And that the pyramids are found in the middle of cemeteries?
where is all the knowledge that should of been passed down from generation to generation gone?
Into lots and lots of books, many of them written in the language of the people.
why cant they tell us how they lit the pyramids,
Well, our information comes from their records AND from Herodotus (who lived in 400 BC) and other people who lived in and wrote about Egypt.
And the people who now claim to be egyptian dont look anything like they did in the past from what evidence we have seen.
Actually, they do. Just look at the facial features of the skeletons.
Genetics may hold the answer but how far do you go back to find the true builders of the great city?
Which great city? There's many of them. I think the most interesting one is probably Armana... there's a number of unanswered questions there. If
you mean Cairo (across from Giza), it's been continually inhabited for 4,000 years so there's layers and layers of evidence and history in the land
and in the cemeteries.
And they're doing DNA studies of the Pharaohs to fill in blanks about how they're related.
I think you may have been getting some information from websites written by people who don't know much about Egypt or its history. I recommend
starting out at Wikipedia and reading about the history first, and then exploring he many links.