It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by Shane
And another thing, concerning the British royal house, their lion crest is somewhat interesting, in that it is a leopard with lion head and bear's feet. In heraldry, a lion which walks on all four legs is a heraldic leopard, the lion's head is obvious, and looking at it's feet, they have four toes, which is translated bear's feet. Some say the bear's feet links the royal family to Troy (Troy means Bear):
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e8a909be599b.jpg[/atsimg]
Terrible quality in the picture, but you get the point.
Originally posted by dontreally
I also find it unlikely that california was just randomly named.
california exports a culture of depravity and immorality. break down the name . Kali - hindu goddess of death, the divine mother, symbol of raw emotional power, and fornia - implying fornication. In Hebrew Da'at', knowledge, knowing something is likened to sex and union. Thus knowing the culture that california exports is essentially Kali-fornia, a fornication with the goddess kali.. Also, in heraldry 'holly' as in the wood, is used as a symbol for truth...reflecting the greek passion for image weaving "magik-tekne., believing the lie bring out the truth...
It really is amazing how deep the most seemingly arbitrary things can be.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by dontreally
The house of Habsburg actually owns the legal deed of Jerusalem I've heared, some say the whole of Palestine/Judea.
As you might understand by now, I am not voting anywhere near in favour of anything fundamenting the idea of the State of Israel. Firstly, only Judah is represented among the Jews today with legal rights to their part of the Land (the Cohenim or sons of Levi have no right to land in the Land) -- and in addition, the broad masses of Jews, are not even Shemites. Ashkenazim og Kazarim make up most of Israel's "Jewish" population, and they are not even Shemites. The only thing Jewish with most "Jews" today, has to do with religion. Gog of Magog anyone?
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by dontreally
Both the Kazars and the Askenazim are procelutes, and there is no uniform Jewish genome being supported in the work for their realm. 90% of Judaism, consists of Slaves and Germanians, and surely not Shemites. As you would knw, both Askenaz and Kazi were sons of Japheth, and more specifically, the branch of Goig of Magiog. Your way of expressing the language of God is based on the Leningrad codexis and the rules layed down by the European Yiddish speaking Jews. Judah's lost spire has ignited the fire of hunger-ibn-Schtakkar. Lost is sense and lost is blood -- and spirit of breath.
Originally posted by dontreally
So, the cohanim among both ashkenaz and Sephardic Jews who have a common source 100 generations back, to the time of Aaron.. whats your explanation for that?
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by dontreally
I know exactly about enough abouit Judaism to know that 90 per cent of every Jew is lesser brouught. And that's when I startt.-
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by dontreally
I might be rather Darwinistic when it comes to Jews and the Land, for it really means a lot to me. My personal opinion is that a nation cannot be sustained and even less established unless there are demographic factors saying these people is a people and therefore they deserve a nation. Faith and religion is not enough to establish a nation thus forcing the indigenous people who has lived there since God knows when, out of their homes. If the Torah is a good law, then why are the Jews of the Israeli nation so evil? As if they were interpreting prophecies as laws? Ie. when God says to Israel that they will enter the Promised Land and kill many people, not sparing children or cattle even, that was said as prophecy, but Israel as they have always done, turned it into law. Look at the Babylonian Talmud and the school of Hillel (or was it Heylel Son of the Morning?) for instance. It is the most racistic and inhumane political agenda around, and even worse than whatever Hitler or the Dutch South Africans managed to produce, still it is revered as the holiest books of Judaism. Or are you unaware that the Talmud basically teach how Jews are the Übermenschen while the Palestinians or Kananites together with the Haral are Untermenschen not worthy of anything really? According to the Talmud, given I am a Jew, I can kill a Palestinian and automatically be forgiven if I can find mistakes in his behavior, but if I were a Palestinian and bitchslapped you in the face, given you are a Jew, you can kill me as the only appropriate result. That is Darwinistic racism and the leading policy in Israel today is Apartheid. How this fits into this thread beats me however. But this post will atleast teach you what I know or believe better.
edit on 21/9/2010 by Neo Christian Mystic because: Added a question mark and an article
Originally posted by dontreally
If your a black, gypsy, or anything else deemed inferior, diseased, either physically or mentally, your dead. Thats it. No choice. And also, theres a major divide in the jewish world between the secular and the orthodox. mentioning Darwin or marx or freud, will only connect you to the secular GNOSTIC SABBATEAN Jews. They are diametrically opposed to the torah of moshe and thus orthodox Judaism.
and btw, hillel is from the root, Halel - to praise.
Guess your obsession with satan has limited your understanding of Hebrew to words that are only relevant to your gnostic lucifer worship.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Originally posted by dontreally
If your a black, gypsy, or anything else deemed inferior, diseased, either physically or mentally, your dead. Thats it. No choice. And also, theres a major divide in the jewish world between the secular and the orthodox. mentioning Darwin or marx or freud, will only connect you to the secular GNOSTIC SABBATEAN Jews. They are diametrically opposed to the torah of moshe and thus orthodox Judaism.
So blacks and gypsies are inferior and diseased compared to you? Now THAT's Darwinistic and straight out racism. What is the difference between an orthodox Jew and a Nazi, I don't get it. I think I'll let these here be my last words in this discussion.
and btw, hillel is from the root, Halel - to praise.
According to my dictionaries Heylel, just as Hilel are both derived from the verb Halel, and Halel means to shine, and Isaiah 14:12 says:
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Heylel, son of the morning ! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
Heylel points to the king of Babylon. Hilel's school is based on the Babylonian Talmud. Coincidence?
Guess your obsession with satan has limited your understanding of Hebrew to words that are only relevant to your gnostic lucifer worship.
Not only do you concider all people who are not Jews diseased Untermenschen, but you also claim I am a Satanist and a gnostic. Wow. Perhaps it's time now to take a look at the rules of this board....
Originally posted by dontreally
Buddy, i actually read Hebrew. I dont need a dictionary to guide me.
The Leningrad Codex (or Codex Leningradensis) is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible in Hebrew, using the masoretic text and Tiberian vocalization.[1] It is dated 1008 (or possibly 1009) according to its colophon.[2] The Aleppo Codex, against which the Leningrad Codex was corrected, is several decades older, but parts of it have been missing since 1947, making the Leningrad Codex the oldest complete codex of the Tiberian mesorah that has survived intact to this day.
In modern times, the Leningrad Codex is most important as the Hebrew text reproduced in Biblia Hebraica (1937) and Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (1977). It also serves scholars as a primary source for the recovery of details in the missing parts of the Aleppo Codex.
That root appears only once in isaiah where it carries the connotation 'to shine'. The root halel appears hundreds if not thousands of times in the tanakh where it means 'to praise'.
to shine
(Qal) to shine (fig. of God's favour)
(Hiphil) to flash forth light
to praise, boast, be boastful
(Qal)
to be boastful
boastful ones, boasters (participle)
(Piel)
to praise
to boast, make a boast
(Pual)
to be praised, be made praiseworthy, be commended, be worthy of praise
(Hithpael) to boast, glory, make one's boast
(Poel) to make a fool of, make into a fool
(Hithpoel) to act madly, act like a madman
King James Word Usage - Total: 165
praise 117, glory 14, boast 10, mad 8, shine 3, foolish 3, fools 2, commended 2, rage 2, celebrate 1, give 1, marriage 1, renowned 1
And, no, It was Nazi policy to kill off Blacks, gypsies, poles, the infirm, both mental and physical in addition to their final plan to eliminate world Jewry. It wasnt my own opinion.
The classless way you twsted my post i think revealed your real duplicitous nature.
Calling you a gnostic is what you are.
Youve already spoke very highly of 'samael', and defended your praying to Satan.
Originally posted by dontreally
Calling you a gnostic is what you are. Youve already spoke very highly of 'samael', and defended your praying to Satan.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Originally posted by dontreally
Buddy, i actually read Hebrew. I dont need a dictionary to guide me.
You read and understand modern Hebrew, which is a completely different language than Biblical Hebrew, which BTW shows itself in many different variants in the Tanakh together with Aramaic and even some Kananean etc. Unless you use dictionaries and lexicons to support your claims about what the people meant 2500 years ago when using the words they did, you are like a modern Italian explaining how he speaks a succeeding Latin language, or a Greek fella trying to understand Koine Greek.
Modern Hebrew bases itself solely on the Leningrad Codex from 1009:
The Leningrad Codex (or Codex Leningradensis) is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible in Hebrew, using the masoretic text and Tiberian vocalization.[1] It is dated 1008 (or possibly 1009) according to its colophon.[2] The Aleppo Codex, against which the Leningrad Codex was corrected, is several decades older, but parts of it have been missing since 1947, making the Leningrad Codex the oldest complete codex of the Tiberian mesorah that has survived intact to this day.
In modern times, the Leningrad Codex is most important as the Hebrew text reproduced in Biblia Hebraica (1937) and Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (1977). It also serves scholars as a primary source for the recovery of details in the missing parts of the Aleppo Codex.
Source: en.wikipedia.org...
The language used in the Leningrad Codex doesn't look or feel very close to the languages and dialects used in the language found in the Dead Sea Scrolls etc which are way older than the Leningrad Codex.
That root appears only once in isaiah where it carries the connotation 'to shine'. The root halel appears hundreds if not thousands of times in the tanakh where it means 'to praise'.
Again, that's your subjective opinion. I know many people who reads and writes Norwegian without bein any more expert in the language than a tenyearold. Below is the definition of Halal, and a psychiatrist would probably recognice this word as one discribing madness in a person:
to shine
(Qal) to shine (fig. of God's favour)
(Hiphil) to flash forth light
to praise, boast, be boastful
(Qal)
to be boastful
boastful ones, boasters (participle)
(Piel)
to praise
to boast, make a boast
(Pual)
to be praised, be made praiseworthy, be commended, be worthy of praise
(Hithpael) to boast, glory, make one's boast
(Poel) to make a fool of, make into a fool
(Hithpoel) to act madly, act like a madman
And in the King James version the following meanings have been used:
King James Word Usage - Total: 165
praise 117, glory 14, boast 10, mad 8, shine 3, foolish 3, fools 2, commended 2, rage 2, celebrate 1, give 1, marriage 1, renowned 1
Source: www.biblestudytools.com...
And, no, It was Nazi policy to kill off Blacks, gypsies, poles, the infirm, both mental and physical in addition to their final plan to eliminate world Jewry. It wasnt my own opinion.
Then next time make sure to mention that.
The classless way you twsted my post i think revealed your real duplicitous nature.
Excuizee me. How old are you really?
Calling you a gnostic is what you are.
I am flattered, but you are mistaken. I am neither Jewish, Gnostic or a Satanist. I am a researcher, so go wash yourself.
Youve already spoke very highly of 'samael', and defended your praying to Satan.
Care to quote? I tend not to drive in personal bias in people and forces I donot know. Saten has never done me anything wrong, and in my opinion, the way religious fanatics attribute all evil they observe as beeing Satan's doing, well, they can also go and wash themselves. I have never seen anyone being able to point at one single thing which Satan has done which is "un-kosher".
edit on 23/9/2010 by Neo Christian Mystic because: edited a mistyped quote tag
edit on 23/9/2010 by Neo Christian Mystic because: Added external quote and source for the dictionary excerpt.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by dontreally
Originally posted by dontreally
Calling you a gnostic is what you are. Youve already spoke very highly of 'samael', and defended your praying to Satan.
This was where I stopped respecting you. How on Earth could you imply that I am praying to Satan? I said in an earlier reply that I use the name Samael when I am talking to God about "Satan", suince he is no enemy to me. You are an inquisisionary -- sorry -- Jew, who call Africans and other black people and people without their genitals being mutilated as being lesser worth than yourself.
Why you are replying to this thread at all baffles me. You haven't brought anything new into the thread as for what the subject is, and you have also managed to derange the discussion in a way that I myself don't like, having written the OP from a completely different standpoint that what you have contributed with here. You seem like some bird of pray trying to catch some nasty prey. Get over it, and stick to topic, you have already managed to get me quite angry with your trolling, so please relate to the OP and comments in relation to the OP.
edit on 23/9/2010 by Neo Christian Mystic because: Removed some personal halal and some typos