""maybe because you haven't been around the block and don't know what to say other than rude dismissive comments ? yes i am beginning to think your are full of BS and don't know anything about this subject since you can't even discuss any of it like everyone does. prove me wrong i dare you ""


This about sums it up easynow. Pseudo-skeptics like ITF on a regular basis will simply throw out a smoke screen of childish arrogance when they have nothing more to offer on a subject other than verbal fecal matter in the form of egotistical wit. I can't even count on one hand the massive array of forum topics people like him will deliberately avoid simply because they have a snowballs chance in hell of explaining them. You just have to take a look at many of the great threads on this forum regarding the extremely well documented incidents over the years which have been presented very well by numerous board members.

What bothers me more than his little childish rants which I have grown to expect over the last few months, is the fact that other members have been warned for much less in terms of manners and decorum.

Phage for example brings balance and logic to threads and is a shining example of how one who has differing viewpoints should act during debate. He doesn't act arrogant and childish and he most certainly doesn't present himself as being any more intelligent than the rest of us. He simply states LOGICAL facts in an attempt to uncover the truth. Something ITF should pay very close attention to if he ever plans to be taken seriously on this forum.

[edit on 16-3-2010 by Jocko Flocko]

---

---

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
This is the type of stuff that would be funny if it wasn't so sad. Forensic, lol.

Honetsly, I tried to make this longer than one line, but I think I summed up what I and many others are thinking when they see tripe like this.

I second that IgnoreTheFacts.

This video is more of a tutorial on graphic manipulation than anything else. Frame Stacking or frame overlapping is the same as GIFF animation which will create and show picture anomaly's.
This is the worst Forensic examination I have came across really. It would be thrown out of any court.

Lunacognita has used his same old footage and added this "Frame Stacking" for what reason is beyond any Forensic Examination more for Entertainment purposes.

Lunacognita is a ATS member why hasn't this thread been started by the author? Well as it happens Lunacognita will not answer probing questions. So from now on if Lunacognita releases a Break through video let the thread be started by the author

@1:42 I did like seeing all that H2O(clear liquid) sliding around on the port window there's a lot of it. which can give an explanation for these bright dots moving at right angles.



Now what I am at is the fact that Lunacognita has upload this video for Examination yet he will not allow us to download it for a better analyst which again leads me to conclude these videos are for Entertainment purposes Only.



Zelong.

Originally posted by Zelong
This video is more of a tutorial on graphic manipulation than anything else.

Yes the frame stacking does enhance the still images, it's a nice technique, but for what purpose? I'm not exactly sure why these images needed enhancement. But if I ever needed to enhance still imagery from a motion picture for some reason frame stacking looks effective, thanks for the tutorial.

It was fun to watch simply because it's film from space and that never ceases to fascinate me, but I'm not sure why it's in the aliens and UFOs forum instead of say "space exploration" or something, I didn't really see any aliens or UFOs. Karl12 mentioned something interesting after 8:50, but isn't that just the lunar module? That's what it looks like to me anyway.

The raw footage alone is amazing, i haven't seen most of it before.

The analysed versions are really interesting. However, *some* of them look like lens flares and some look like debris. I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to be seeing in a lot of the moon ones....

There is some extremely intriguing footage though, some which is pretty hard to explain. I'm fascinated by the speedy blue thing. It looks like there are blue dots before it arrives?

I really don't see anything that is unexplainable in this video, I feel cheated.

What are the last two minutes of video supposed to show besides the lunar surface? I don't see anything out of the ordinary at all.

Originally posted by easynow
maybe but how would you know for sure that he added to much contrast and it in fact "destroyed" some details when you couldn't see the details without the enhancement ? in other words how did you arrive at this conclusion of yours ?

When I wrote "the result" I should have wrote "the final image", I don't know if it was the staking that added too much contrast or not (although I think it was not), but I (and everyone else) can see the difference in contrast between each individual frames and the final image.

As for the loss of detail, I don't know if there was any, but looking at the original frames I think that there are more shades of grey than on the final image, and if that's the case then there was some detail loss.

i could care less about getting stars or flags but jeee whiz ArMaP, that's not very nice and i never expected to hear something like that come from a forum moderator. shouldn't you be encouraging people to post things here on ATS and giving them some credit for doing just that ?

It's not a question of giving you the stars/flags/applauses, it's a question of another ATS member not getting the deserved "awards" for his work; as he didn't posted it nobody can give him direct credit and/or "awards".

---

---

---

---

That was the most worth while 10 minutes I have spent on ATS in a long, long time. easynow

That boomerang thingy was crazy. That one at the end WOW! What was that? Has NASA ever commented on it? Lots of cool stuff in that vid. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

S&F