|
|
Topic started on 16-3-2010 @ 05:18 PM by easynow
|
                       +7 more
Awesome new video just posted by LunaCognita which features a forensic examination of the Apollo
D.A.C. (Data Acquisition Camera) imagery that show's UFO's and some anomaly's on the
Lunar surface !
www.youtube.com...
in this presentation, we will focus on taking a closer look at several interesting segments of film footage from the NASA archives. All the
footage shown and analyzed here was originally shot by NASA astronauts during the Apollo missions (1968-1972) on 16mm film, using what was known as
the "Data Acquisition Camera" - the "DAC".
The Maurer "DAC" cameras were modified variable frame rate 16mm motion picture film cameras used by the various Apollo crews throughout their
missions to film scenes of interest through the windows of the spacecraft, interior spacecraft activities, as well as to shoot exterior footage during
lunar surface "moonwalk" operations and Low-Earth Orbit or Trans-Earth-Coast EVA ops in cis-lunar space.
I included a bit more information on the Apollo DAC camera in the brief writeup I did attached to the earlier teaser/trailer video for this
presentation - www.youtube.com...
FRAME-STACKING
In the last half of this presentation (starting at 4:30), I show various examples where I employ an enhancement technique known as "frame-stacking"
against the raw DAC archive footage. In certain cases, frame-stacking can be employed to forensically attack the raw frames of film and produce an
enhanced composite still-frame of a stable (or motion-stabilized) scene. It should be noted that "stacking" is by no means a new method of enhancing
video or motion picture film footage. It is a digital enhancement technique that has been around a lot longer than most people would probably believe,
and in many cases it can provide us an improved look at some of the deeper image detail that is actually buried beneath the random "noise" in the
raw footage.
you can read the rest here...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
[edit on 16-3-2010 by easynow]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Aliens and UFOs topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:22 PM by IgnoreTheFacts
|
           
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:48 PM by Alaskan Man
|
                       +8 more
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts
Why the need to be so rude, can't you simply state you don't agree with it without insulting it?
Its "funny-sad-tripe"... OK we get it, you don't agree with it, i guess anyone who doesn't agree with you should describe you in the same
method?
I thought it was a decent video, and had shown things i hadn't seen before, thank you OP for taking the time to post.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:50 PM by easynow
|
                       +3 more
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:53 PM by kinda kurious
|
  
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts
Would you not agree that the "stack-effect" yielded increased detail?
2nd line = It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness.
Just kurious
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:55 PM by restless genius
|

reply to post by easynow
Hi easynow, I saw lunacognita's first DAC video which was interesting, am gonna watch this one now thanks for posting S&F
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 06:12 PM by karl 12
|
    
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 06:50 PM by MOTT the HOOPLE
|

I wonder how long we will have to keep playing spot the anomaly before NASA just comes clean? I hope they do it before we are head long into WW3..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:04 PM by Lee_K
|
Luna's first few video's were and still are some of the best collection of footage I have ever seen.
But I think some of the things in his last few video's are very debatable to be debris or craters.
But still you have to give the guy 10/10 for effort imo!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 07:18 PM by ArMaP
|
reply to post by easynow
Another great work from LunaCognita, even if I think it shows nothing out of the ordinary (but I haven't seen it all).
The stacking is a good idea, but I think the result has too much contrast, that destroys some detail.
PS: As this wasn't posted by LunaCognita, no applause or star for you.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:17 PM by Alaskan Man
|
Originally posted by ArMaP
PS: As this wasn't posted by LunaCognita, no applause or star for you.
Just looking for some clarification, are you saying since it wasn't posted by LunaCognita on ATS their will be no star etc, or are you saying that
the video wasn't done by LunaCognita?
just curious cause it would be lame if someone on youtube was impersonating him/her (Luna)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:29 PM by Malcram
|
     
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:33 PM by ArMaP
|
  
reply to post by Alaskan Man
What I mean is that as LunaCognita is an ATS member, if he(?) had been the one creating this thread I could give him some sign of my appreciation for
his work, but as this was posted by easynow, in the same way as someone else posts some other person's YouTube video, I cannot really give easynow
any sign of appreciation for someone else's (LunaCognita) work.
I hope I haven't made things even more confusing with my explanation.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 08:52 PM by eyeinoz
|

reply to post by easynow
  now i know what the aboriginals have been doing developing a new boomerang  :lol  ut of this world.  good vid though.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 09:38 PM by IgnoreTheFacts
|

reply to post by easynow
Hey easy, has it crossed your mind that I did watch the first few minutes before posting? Maybe I don't need to watch all 9 minutes of some "youtube
superstar's" video before I can render my opinion. You might call that jumping the gun and not being open minded I guess. But I have been around the
block a few times and can recognize absurd tripe pretty quickly. Don't worry, you'll get there sooner or later. Keep wading through the muck, and
hopefully in a few years you will look back and laugh at some of the silly things you gave credit too.
When your eating and come across something you dislike, you stop eating. You don't finish the whole plate then ask for seconds?
[edit on 16-3-2010 by IgnoreTheFacts]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 10:41 PM by Malcram
|
       
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 10:43 PM by Alaskan Man
|
reply to post by ArMaP
haha no don't worry you didn't add to the confusion, you answered the question perfectly, i didn't know Luna was a member of ATS,
thanks for answering that for me 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 10:58 PM by Titen-Sxull
|

reply to post by easynow
Definitely an interesting video. The first few video clips primarily show debris particles, they certainly don't look like craft or intelligently
controlled objects. The only one that was truly out of the ordinary to me was the one of Alan Shepard in which bright objects seem to be motoring past
the window. Other than that its just an interesting grouping of footage and contains no evidence of a NASA cover-up of any kind... so why the thread
title?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 11:15 PM by Jocko Flocko
|
        
Interesting technique to bring out the details in older films. The "fast mover" stack from one of his other vids is especially interesting, what it
was is anyones guess. It was interesting to see just how much colour and definition that process brought out in the lunar module shots. It really
enhanced the colours and sharpness. Nice post easynow.
IgnoreTheFacts just earned an Ignore from me as it was the last time I was prepared to read his arrogant tripe. I urge everyone else as well to ignore
these types of rude members and thier trolling behaviour.
[edit on 16-3-2010 by Jocko Flocko]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 11:17 PM by easynow
|
             
|
copyright & usage
|
 |