Want to hear stuff straight out of a high school history book?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 04:23 PM by ararisq
reply to post by summerdreary



The Federal Reserve is a national banking system - alright - does it mention that it is privately owned?


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 04:28 PM by summerdreary
reply to post by riddle6



Maine, and yeah, the book has an extensive chapter on 9/11. It makes me cringe, actually.
___________________________

The War on Terrorism: How can the USA combat terrorism?



On the morning of September 11th, 2001 two airliners crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade center in New York City and a third smashed into a section of the pentagon near Washington D.C. A fourth airliner...
Nineteen Arab terrorists had hijacked planes and used them as missiles in an attempt to destroy predetermined targets.
The first three planes hit their targets. In the fourth plane, passengers fought the hijackers and the plane went down short of it's target.

Explosions and raging fire weakened the the twin towers. Within two hours after the attack, both skyscrapers had crumbled to the ground. One wing of the pentagon was extensively damaged. About 3,000 people were killed in the attacks. THey included all passengers in the 4 planes...The acts of Sept. 11 were the most destructive acts of terrorism in modern history,

[edit on 16-3-2010 by summerdreary]


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 04:33 PM by summerdreary
reply to post by ararisq



Nowhere does it mention that at all.
(To bad I knew it anyway.)


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 04:44 PM by projectvxn
reply to post by summerdreary



This book teaches you that the Federal Reserve is the wallet of the banking industry? We're screwed! If that is the case why do we have private banks in the first place?

My god your book is politicized!



reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 04:49 PM by imitator
Originally posted by summerdreary
reply to
post by riddle6



Maine, and yeah, the book has an extensive chapter on 9/11. It makes me cringe, actually.
___________________________

The War on Terrorism: How can the USA combat terrorism?



On the morning of September 11th, 2001 two airliners crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade center in New York City and a third smashed into a section of the pentagon near Washington D.C. A fourth airliner...
Nineteen Arab terrorists had hijacked planes and used them as missiles in an attempt to destroy predetermined targets.
The first three planes hit their targets. In the fourth plane, passengers fought the hijackers and the plane went down short of it's target.

Explosions and raging fire weakened the the twin towers. Within two hours after the attack, both skyscrapers had crumbled to the ground. One wing of the pentagon was extensively damaged. About 3,000 people were killed in the attacks. THey included all passengers in the 4 planes...The acts of Sept. 11 were the most destructive acts of terrorism in modern history,

[edit on 16-3-2010 by summerdreary]


Oh wow! I haven't seen a history book in a long time, it used to be my best subject. And now they have 911 in them? That seems a little odd as most of the events on 911 have never been fully answered!

I wonder, does it teach that governments can carry out "false flag" terror attacks?
Does it teach to combat terrorism, is by loosing your civil rights?


[edit on 16-3-2010 by imitator]


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:04 PM by summerdreary
reply to post by Beinion


"The south, with its plantation economy, had come to rely on an enslaved labor force. The North, with its diversified industries, was less dependent on slavery. As the North industrailised, Northern opposition to slavery grew more intense. The controversy over slavery only worsened as new territories and states were admitted into the union. Supporters of slavery saw an opportunity to create more slave states, while opponents equally remained determined that slavery should not spread.


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:08 PM by LegalizeFreedom
reply to post by Beinion



I second that notion. WOW. Seriously. I don't really have any other comment on that one.


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:22 PM by Phlynx
Originally posted by summerdreary
reply to
post by Beinion


"The south, with its plantation economy, had come to rely on an enslaved labor force. The North, with its diversified industries, was less dependent on slavery. As the North industrailised, Northern opposition to slavery grew more intense. The controversy over slavery only worsened as new territories and states were admitted into the union. Supporters of slavery saw an opportunity to create more slave states, while opponents equally remained determined that slavery should not spread.



The civil war wasn't even mainly about slavery. The south was for a more decentralized government with less taxes. Some where for slaves, others weren't. Wow.



reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:29 PM by riddle6
reply to post by summerdreary



You're reply to Beinion was more of what I was asking for. Sorry I wasn't clearer about that in my original post. I should have known to have been a little more specific, since most American history books go all out on the Civil War.

As for what your book says, I'm not surprised. I remember the first time one of my history teachers in college flat out told everyone that the Civil War was not about slavery and how it only became a "moral" issue until later in the war. You could have heard a pin drop, that class became so quiet.


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:34 PM by imitator
reply to post by summerdreary



Ah, I see the history propaganda machine hasn't changed one bit about the American Civil WaR! That is just crazy to think with the internet and all nowadays, you would think they would tell the truth instead of still making it about slavery?

There was no huge Northern opposition to slavery before the war, unless one counts John Brown and it was the North who hung him and his buddies... He didn't have to many supporters neither... There was only Slave propaganda during the civil war and then much more afterwards, and that was used to grab control of the southern economy, as the south wanted to be a sovereign industrialized nation...

[edit on 16-3-2010 by imitator]


reply posted on 16-3-2010 @ 05:36 PM by Nosred
reply to post by summerdreary



How does it describe General Sherman from the civil war, as a monster or hero?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 16 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 12 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 18 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 16 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 14 days ago with 85 member flags