Death penalty dead and buried as Parliament bans it for good , page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 04:58 PM by budski
reply to post by Scramjet76



I was going to post this link up myself, but Ismail beat me to it on the previous page - Link

I think you'll agree that this shows that states without the DP have LOWER murder rates, so that kind of changes the deterrent argument to the argument about revenge/retribution, which I believe not only demeans us as a society, but brutalises and de-sensitises us as individuals.

At the end of the day, murder is murder, whether state sanctioned or not.

Many right wingers are fanatical about biblical quotations, but "thou shalt not kill" seems to have slipped under their radar - I don't recall anything about "thou shalt not kill, UNLESS"

For me, it is not a religious debate though, it is a debate about our progression as a species and as a society (western) - we are not cavemen.

I have no problem locking up somone who has committed a heinous crime for life, and I also believe that punishment and loss of liberty is a fate far worse than death for people who commit certain crimes - however I would draw the line before it got to brutality or certain practices that may be considered forms of torture.


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 05:15 PM by Kandinsky
reply to post by budski

I agree. Inflammatory posts aren't my style, but it's worth making an exception here. 'In my opinion,' the death penalty is a symbol of abject ignorance. Apart from satisfying questionable notions of vengeance, it's hard to justify.


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 06:14 PM by Verum Astrum
reply to post by ModernAcademia


Hi there ModernAcademia,

This is a good thing.

I am an Australian.
Our federal opposition leader Tony Abbott was talking publicly mid-February about the death penalty. He was asked his views and replied

"Well, you know, what would you do with someone who cold-bloodedly brought about the deaths of hundreds or thousands of innocent people? I mean, you've got to ask yourself, what punishment would fit that crime? That's when you do start to think that maybe the only appropriate punishment is death."

This move by the federal Gov is probably a quick response to that.

Tony Abbott is also against abortion and was very vocal over the RU486 abortion pill.

I would like to go on record to say that I for one am glad to live in a country without the death penalty.

Killing someone because they killed someone is not only hypocritical but downright ridiculous. Sadly, irony seems to be a strong human trait.

Cheers, VA


reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 08:41 PM by wayaboveitall
Originally posted by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by wayaboveitall

I dont mind my tax dollars benefiting society, thats the whole idea, but I do resent them benefiting scum who should be in the ground.



[edit on 16-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]


Do you mind them spent killing innocent brown people in the middle east? oh wait. you think they're freedom fighters.


Yes I do, and no I dont. Dont assume to know my mind. Attack my arguments, not me.

Killing someone because they killed someone is not only hypocritical but downright ridiculous. Sadly, irony seems to be a strong human trait.

Cheers, VA


This is the basic theme of post 'against' throughout the thread, and yes, Vengence IS a strong and natural human trait, which those who choose the moral highground deny. They do so because they were never unfortunate to experience within themselves the strength of it.
We do demand vengence, we require it for phsycological healing as part of the greif and anger process caused by trauma.
When your childs/loved ones murderer sits cuffed in the dock protected by police smirking throughout the trial because he knows he'll be released in a few years by some well meaning bleeding heart straight out shrink school, YES, you want him dead, you need vegence , its catharic to self healing.
Denying folk natural justice, as opposed to the dictionary/law definition, creates more victims than the killer.

The dead are not the only victims, family, freinds and loves who must go on living , not seeing justice, are done mental and emotional damage (a crime by the system). They can have issues for years, difficulty trusting, forming relationships, fear etc, some become bitter and full of hate, lose faith in the system and regard for the law, and what has the bleeding heart leniency acheived? A more messed up society. One in which
scumbags know the law and the dodgy system is in their favor if they get caught.

Victim impact statements are a weak joke, meaningless, and often totally ignored.
They are a placebo, nothing more. Give them something, so they beleive we are listening.

3.1 Chronological history of victim impact statements
Common law: In New South Wales at common law, victim impact statements were
admitted in some cases such as sexual assaults to provide the court with information which
it otherwise did not have concerning the severity of the offence upon the victim.12 But
victim impact statements from family victims were generally excluded in homicide cases.
For example, in the sentence proceedings of R v De Souza (unreported, Supreme Court, 10
November 1995) the Crown sought to tender a number of victim impact statements from
family members of a young woman who had been murdered. The defence objected to the
admission and relevance of the statements. Justice Dunford found that the statements ‘to
some extent’ dealt with the impact of the victim’s death on her relatives, including
depression, insomnia, and lack of concentration on studies and work. But the relatives also
expressed their views on extraneous matters: the defence of diminished responsibility and
other aspects of the case; their desire for revenge; their own medical problems, unsupported
by documentation from medical practitioners; and the penalty that should be imposed.
Dunford J concluded that, ‘The so-called Victim Impact Statements therefore being
objected to and unsworn, and irrelevant to any issue of sentencing, are not admissible and
are rejected.’1


section 10

www.parliament.nsw.gov.au...$File/10-02.pdf

[edit on 17-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 12:59 AM by ganja
reply to post by wayaboveitall



Nice to see someone man enough to accept the "darker" side of their humanity. Too many people look into that mirror and shrink back in fear of what they see, and deem what they saw as evil or bad instead of "helped my ancestors survive." We are still animals, though we are smart ones, and like all animals we have certain behaviors ingrained in us, not to mention needs. I would really like to expound on this, but I don't have the time. Maybe tomorrow Either way, good thread Op, and a pleasure discussing with all of you!

Also, to the guy saying stuff directly to wayabove about the soldiers killing brown people... I'm not too sure how much control he has over the army, and if he does have any measure of control with which to control said army, I'd advise not pissing him off Night all!


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 01:50 PM by Ismail
Aboveitall, Your argument about the death penalty making society better has been proven to be a fallacy. Now you refer to something new, "it is human nature to want revenge".

Wrong again. Human nature is, as murder rates are, conditioned by the society we live in. Violent society = high murder rates.

This is not a case of human nature, because human nature does not exist. There is only human behavior. The will to seek revenge is instilled by society, because of the way we percieve crime. In your own words, a murderer is just a "scumbag". Wrong. A murderer is the by-product of the society he has grown up in. If you check out the statistics, the "typical" murderer generally has had little if no education, and has grown up in a poor environnement, which leads to stress, excess aggressivity, and an exacerbated drive to "do what is necessary to survive". In other words, the average murderer is an intelligent, but fierce animal. You percieve his crimes as "evil" (another by-product of society by the way, 2000 years ago the concept did not even exist), and therefore the perpetrator as a "scumbag". I percieve this individual's conduct as the by-product of a dysfuctional society. The responsabily, therefore, can not be (fully) imputed to the individual. Had he grown up in different environnement, he would probably not have killed anyone.

What I am saying here does not negate the heinous nature of his crimes. It does however, explain them. Society is responsible for these aberrant behaviors. Change society, and you will no longer have these behaviors. Punishing the culprit with death is not (as prooven) usefull to society. Giving in to animalistic behaviors, such as revenge, will only act as a repercussion on society, and therfore CREATE more violent behavior (hence more murders, as the statistics I liked to you proove).

The actual impulse of revenge is creating a violent context from which more killing (starting by the man executed for his crimes) will emerge. In a different societ, we would view revenge as primitive, and criminals as sick people who need to be helped. In time, and in a different context, I believe that even the victims would begin to reason this way. After blood has been spilled, only the uneducated or ignorant call for more, because thus they are only perpetuating a cycle of violence.


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 08:22 PM by wayaboveitall
Aboveitall, Your argument about the death penalty making society better has been proven to be a fallacy.


No it hasnt, it simply has been mitigated by the bleedingheart factor, by the appeals process, by the cost incurred as a result of that, and by lack of implementation over enough time, especially here. and by societys apathy and selfishness, and pursuit of the dollar over pursuit of maintaining decent family/community values.

No such thing is 'proven', just beleived. While you may be right that some of such violent crimes are the result of upbringing/society, They are not all by a long chalk.
You open up the whole nature v's nurture argument.
Your claims have been used as excuse for all manner of crime, and its a cop out.

What I am saying here does not negate the heinous nature of his crimes. It does however, explain them. Society is responsible for these aberrant behaviors.


No its not, the offender is responsible!
Where is responsibility for your own actions? None of these 'poor, unfortunate, mistreated 'victims of society' you talk about was forced to commit crime against their will.
You and other bleeding hearts who blame everything on society, and oppose the death penalty, ironically fail to collectively campaign authorities
to make whatever changes you beleive will cause society to better itself and eliminate such crimes, you merely cry nurture victim and oppose what measures they do implement.

All of you who oppose on moral grounds to the death penalty, each fail to actually voice idea's of your own. Its easy to crap on another guys ideas, but harder to come up with better ones huh?
Your happy to simply keep locking up more and more of society as it gets worse and claim its working, but not to use whatever means are suggested by those you disagree with. Yet you same folk will be first to complain when crime/violence effects you. You complain about laws, you cry 'civil rights', you expect law and police alone to make the world safer.
Complain about loss of libertys in exchange for safety (especially since 9/11) yet expect to have your cake and eat it too.
You either accept whatever is nessesary to force change for the better, or shut up and put up with it as it is (apathy).

You say violence breeds violence? I say Apathy breeds violence!

I say society is a victim too, of its own apathy toward scumbags, of its tolerance of them. Bring back the death penalty.

[edit on 18-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]

[edit on 18-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 11:17 PM by wayaboveitall
Giving in to animalistic behaviors, such as revenge, will only act as a repercussion on society, and therfore CREATE more violent behavior (hence more murders, as the statistics I liked to you proove).


See Below.

If you check out the statistics, the "typical" murderer generally has had little if no education, and has grown up in a poor environnement, which leads to stress, excess aggressivity, and an exacerbated drive to "do what is necessary to survive". In other words, the average murderer is an intelligent, but fierce animal.


Tell me how is raping babies, or old ladies, or murder, nessesary to survive? I demand you answer this!
If hes intelligent then what has lack of education to do with it? He knows its wrong.

Had he grown up in different environnement, he would probably not have killed anyone.


Murderers come from all kinds of enviroments, not all of them negative.
I dont buy that. He was inclined to kill and he did, period.
How do you account for millions, nay biliions of other poor, uneducated folk living in violent communitys that DONT Murder, rape etc ? They just forgot?

Ganja is absolutely right. Treat people like animals (prison) and they behave like animals. Prison 'hardens' and brutalises criminals and most who are released are worse than they went in.
Prison dosent rehabilitate, it merely punishes, and whats more the re-offend rate for most is sky high.

Its punishment merely to give society a sense that justice has been served, while the reality is very different.
Creating more and more legislation, and jailing people for breaking it, dosent work.

Another crisis for the government occurred on 7 November 1987 when prisoner Jamie Partlic was bashed by another prisoner in the Central Industrial Prison at Long Bay. Jamie Partlic had been serving a sentence as a parking fine defaulter and was bashed so brutally he sustained brain damage and remained in a coma for almost six months. The incident led to widespread changes in the way fines were dealt with, including the establishment of the State Debt Recovery Office and the abolition of imprisonment for fine default.


www.app.unsw.edu.au...

[quotePrison rape endangers the public safety by making brutalized inmates more likely to commit crimes when they are released—as 600,000 inmates are each year.
The frequently interracial character of prison sexual assaults significantly exacerbates interracial tensions, both within prison and, upon release of perpetrators and victims from prison, in the community at large.
Prison rape increases the level of homicides and other violence against inmates and staff, and the risk of insurrections and riots.
Victims of prison rape suffer severe physical and psychological effects that hinder their ability to integrate into the community and maintain stable employment upon their release from prison. They are thus more likely to become homeless and/or require government assistance.
Members of the public and government officials are largely unaware of the epidemic character of prison rape and the day-to-day horror experienced by victimized inmates.


en.wikipedia.org...

Your alternative to death for murder and the like, jail for life, Is more brutalising than death, and leaves the prisoner more dangerous to society onrelease (where 'life' is less than 'the term of natural life', ie in australia 13-15 years.
A muderer dosent emerge from 15 years in jail, all rehabilitated, fit for tea and scones with your grandmother and kissing babies, as you bleeding hearts would like to beleive.
He went in a murderous scumbag and emerged a worse scumbag, free to walk the streets because folk like you in your ivory towers take the holier than thou ,moral highground, and deny reality.
The system dosent work, and continuing to cottonwool scumbags, creates more of them.
A society that dosent tolerate abominations, Must take a harder stance.
Longer sentences dont cut it. Shoving evidence of societys decay under the rug for X years, (prison sentences) dosent solve it!

True enough, its time we pulled the finger out with our kids to prevent another generation of scumbags, but its not enough alone and its not happening anyway, So many parents should never had children, and alot of parents have no idea anymore. Little wonder each generation produces more monsters.
Some folk need to be eliminated entirely, and human society as a whole needs a major reality check.
Your new age ideas are just swell by themselves, but useless when society
remains apathetic, and resistant to change.

The world needs bootcamp, and the death penalty should be part of it.



[edit on 18-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]

Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 3 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 10 days ago with 37 member flags