reply to post by kdial1
I am going to go out on a limb here and predict that absolutely nothing will come of this. I know it's crazy... but that's how I roll.
We need to demand an immediate release of the e-mails, phone records, and meeting notes from the NY Fed and key Lehman principals regarding the NY Fed’s review of Lehman’s solvency. If, as things appear now, Lehman was allowed by the Fed’s inaction to remain in business, when the Fed should have insisted on a wind-down ..... at a minimum, the NY Fed helped perpetuate a fraud on investors and counterparties. This pattern further suggests the Fed, which by its charter is tasked to promote the safety and soundness of the banking system, instead, via its collusion with Lehman management, operated to protect particular actors to the detriment of the public at large.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
reply to post by kdial1
I am going to go out on a limb here and predict that absolutely nothing will come of this. I know it's crazy... but that's how I roll.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
reply to post by kdial1
But they are above the law. Haven't they established that by now? Let's make a friendly wager. If anyone burns for this, I will put "kdial1 was right and I was wrong" as my signature. If nobody burns, well you don't have to do anything. But I will stand by it if you are correct.
I am just so jaded at this point that I can't even imagine a world where entities like this will be held accountable for anything whatsoever.
Sounds good....Insiders knew that Repo 105 had no economic purpose but was used solely for window dressing: "It is another drug we r on [sic]," an executive complained in an internal e-mail. A whistle-blower told Lehman's auditing firm, Ernst & Young, about the extraordinary popularity of Repo 105, but the auditors didn't look into the claim, which Valukas believes may constitute "professional malpractice." (E&Y says it did its auditing properly.)
Dick Fuld crowed to Wall Street about Lehman's success in reducing leverage, as if it had done so by selling hard-to-market assets as investors and regulators wanted. He and other top executives told Valukas that they weren't aware how Repo 105 was used. Valukas makes it quite clear that he thinks they're lying, but says the truth is up to a court to decide. His report points to several important lessons. One is the folly of relying on self-discipline and self-regulation in the financial markets.
The credit-rating firms were utterly useless in appraising Lehman's true condition. Ernst & Young's dereliction seems so extreme that it deserves harsh punishment, maybe even extinction ("to obliterate, to punish and to discourage others," John le Carre wrote in another context). And I'd love to hear an argument for allowing any of Lehman's independent directors, who seem seldom to have asked a penetrating question, ever to serve on a corporate board again.
As I write, those 10 directors, who pulled down better than $100,000 cash a year to sit jointly in the driver's seat for Lehman's race to disaster, still boast at least 15 company directorships among them. Does this make you confident that corporate America is in good hands? Me neither.....
LA Times