What might really be happening in Washington State?, page 40
Pages: <<  37    38    39    40  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 107 times


reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 01:28 AM by westcoast
reply to post by PacificBlue



I've always given a great deal of merit to the Indian 'stories'....perhaps the most acurate form of historical data for this area dating that far back.

On that note, Puterman just sent me a link to a recent article found by another ATS member (probably posted here on ATS somewhere already, I am sure) that is quite interesting.

Monster Earthquake Looms....


So to go totally off-topic, I am wondering if any of my friends here are affilliated with or have personal knowledge of endocrinology? I need some help in this area, so if you think you could give some advice, please U2U me.


reply posted on 12-3-2012 @ 02:36 AM by PacificBlue
reply to post by westcoast



Thanks, that article is interesting, and it is also interesting that the First Nation Village is moving to higher ground. I agree that the Indian stories are the most accurate history of this area that we have. Some of the stories of tsunamis and floods that the Indian legends talk about, make it sound like entire areas were underwater for a while, so I hope that it is not time yet.

Also, the simulation video was scary, as I am currently residing under one of the big red circles. But I guess it is good to know what may happen, so one can kind of be prepared. I picture the Portland metro area looking a lot like Christchurch if we ever got a really big quake in the right spot, or maybe even worse.


reply posted on 24-3-2012 @ 05:34 PM by westcoast
So not a whole lot to talk about on this thread for awhile.....until today.

Just had a 3.6 shallow quake about ten miles from my house! (about an hour ago) I was outside when it happend, hiking around in the wilds behind my house. I heard what sounded like an explosion from a distance, with some resonation in the ground. I thought it a bit odd.....like an explosion, but with a different quality. If it was a quake did cross my mind, but more so that it might be Baker or Glacier peak (that are both about an hour from me) because of the boom quality. I made a mental note to check the seismos when I came inside, but my quake alert on my phone got me about a half hour later first.

HERE

Is a nearby webi....

Magnitude 3.6
Date-Time Saturday, March 24, 2012 at 21:16:18 UTC
Saturday, March 24, 2012 at 02:16:18 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 48.338°N, 122.272°W
Depth 8.5 km (5.3 miles)
Region WASHINGTON
Distances 4 km (2 miles) NW (311°) from Lake McMurray, WA
5 km (3 miles) E (93°) from Conway, WA
7 km (4 miles) SSW (203°) from Big Lake, WA
79 km (49 miles) N (3°) from Seattle, WA

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.3 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 0.7 km (0.4 miles)
Parameters Nph= 39, Dmin=13 km, Rmss=0.26 sec, Gp= 47°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=2
Source Pacific Northwest Seismic Network

Event ID uw60404846


SOURCE


I have asked PNSN Director John Vidale on the PNSN facebook site about it. If there was any different quality to the signal. Perhaps it is just because I was so close that it didn't seem like a typical quake.



reply posted on 24-3-2012 @ 05:58 PM by westcoast
reply to post by westcoast



Any local ATS residents have an opinion or want to take a look at it? To my untrained eye it seems a little odd...but nothing obvious.


reply posted on 26-3-2012 @ 05:04 PM by berkeleygal
reply to post by westcoast



Now that's a cool picture!

Here's a suggestion, do you have a pair of HD sunglasses? Try taking a picture thru the lens of the glasses. I had on a pair not too long ago and looked at the sun, there was a halo that I could not see with the naked eye. Worth a try.


reply posted on 26-3-2012 @ 05:40 PM by SheeplFlavoredAgain
reply to post by westcoast



Unfortunately I can't read graphs or anything like that. But I had a 3.6 very near me last year in MD. boom, crackkkkkkkkkk....thud thud thud deep booming with shaking. If it hadn't been for the incredible shaking that followed, I would have thought one huge lightning bolt had struck one imaginary huge tree right down the street. The boom was loud and that crackkkkkkkkkk noise was like the ground ripping apart. But when I went out the next morning all was fine, there was no huge fissure one might expect to see after hearing the ground crack like that. Does any of this sound familiar? What exactly struck you odd?


reply posted on 1-5-2012 @ 06:55 PM by westcoast
Okay, so I haven't posted on here in quite some time, but I think I need to update.


There has been discussion on other various threads regarding the recent moderate-sized quakes occuring off-shore Vancouver: (the most recent about an hour ago)

MAP 4.5 2012/05/01 22:53:50 50.683 -129.454 16.0 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
MAP 3.8 2012/04/29 05:12:21 50.746 -129.741 10.0 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
MAP 4.5 2012/04/28 03:42:24 50.594 -129.774 15.5 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
MAP 4.0 2012/04/27 16:22:34 50.707 -129.607 5.0 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
MAP 4.4 2012/04/27 12:52:47 50.630 -129.696 10.0 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION
MAP 3.9 2012/04/25 06:24:02 50.732 -129.995 27.8 VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION


source




SO.....the problem with this, is it seems that USGS is only reporting quakes that are above a certain magnitude. Now this has come up before. I don't recall all the details, but I know I have discussed it in the past. Typically, USGS is triggered at 4.5 and above, but sometimes they'll be watching and listing some smaller ones (over 3.5) for the region because, well....perhaps because it is the Northern edge of the Cascadian subduction zone and may be the only warning we get for the next mega quake???!!!!!

*sigh*....I don't get it. Is it a border thing? Is it an issue with the two countries working together? Or is there really no issue other than that we, the public don't see the monitoring or communication going on between the different organizations? Because it really bothers me that USGS/PNSN do NOT list these quakes. I know they are watching. John Vidale (director for PNSN) has been talking about them on the PNSN facebook site and even provided a link to where we can see the REAL action going on there...it's kinda scary:

Canadian site for quakes near vancouver


There has been a MASSIVE amount this past week. I haven't counted them yet...but I will. I'll guess it's around three dozen or so.

If we were to move this swarm (yes, it is most definately a SWARM) to the region that we often see some 4-5 mag quakes off-shore Oregon, people would be literally throwing the red flags and running around. But because it is nestled up at the northern edge in Canadian waters.....we hear literally NOTHING about it. It makes NO sense! Now..it is quite important as to whether these are originating from the subducting plates, or another well-known fault in the area that is a strike-slip. Problem is...the USGS and the Canadian site don't even have the quakes in the same place. They are spread around a bit and have different depths. So...what then? Are they coming from both? I dunno, but it would be nice to have some more discussion on this!

What say you??


reply posted on 6-5-2012 @ 01:52 PM by PacificBlue
reply to post by westcoast



Great picture, I really like how you can see the tops of the trees, that is neat. I was glad that it was not too cloudy last night to see the moon. And today is sunny and warm, finally, hope it is nice up where you are too!
Pages: <<  37    38    39    40  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 2 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags