Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by Mister E
So if he is a liar, which I think he must be, why hasn't anyone debunked it yet?
I for one have not seen enough of his material to say anything substantial, but, what I have seen were very obvious satellites and likely natural phenomena.
I think much of the case is that there is no light pollution, so normally unseen things like sats and minor meteors, small space junk reentry and the like are VERY visible. Couple that along with the idea to a visitor of being in a place where UFO's are rampant, and the individual is already primed for a UFO sighting.
Then again, it could be as I've said about a great many UFO "hot spots", that something manifests because people are there to see it.
As far as this case in particular, I have not seen anything compelling out of the footage. In other words, debunk...what exactly.