9mm vs .380, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 12-3-2010 @ 05:49 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by SideWynder
reply to
post by captaintyinknots



Sorry, I did not make that post clear.. I was not calling the .380 or the 9mm "girly guns" What I meant was in general terms that the "physical" size/weight.. etc. of the gun..

IE. if you are more comfortable with a small frame gun, or even a smaller caliber. (.25, etc..) you are better off using that than getting a .38 snubnose, or a .44mag, etc... just to impress...

Not picking on you, actually just trying to help, any handgun that you can use comfortably and accurately, is better than the one that just looks "impressive"..

I hope I clarified what I was trying to say..
Also the sig, .40 p230, was a nice "smaller" framed gun, comparable to the 380s and smaller than most 9mm, with lighter recoil for a small framed gun..


No worries, I just had to point it out because, since I have started researching, basically one out of every 5 opinions i get is 'you should go with a .45, 9mm and ,380 are weak and made for girls". It makes me laugh.

I actually do get what you are saying. As I said to someone else, my goal is to practice enough that I could put someone down with a .22lr if needed....frankly, I just dont buy the idea that a .380 or a 9mm wont put someone down-i have to believe, if you know what you are doing, it really wouldnt matter on size.

No worries, no offense taken though.

The other thing steering me away from .45 cal(i am not sure if I said this in this thread or another one, sorry if I am repeating myself) is that I have had a recent hand surgery, and am a few months away from being able to really start to build the strength back in my hand.

Now, I know that it isnt a great idea to buy when I am not in good shooting shape, but frankly, I see a day coming soon when we wont be able to buy them at all, and I want one before that happens. After I heal a bit, I am giong to delve into the .40's and .45's. But for now, I want a good, high quality, smaller cal.

I do think, though, after hearing all the great input from everyone on here, I will go with the 9mm instead of the .380.

You seem to be high on Sigs. One that I have been looking at heavily are the p225/p6's, in 9mm. Any experience with them?


reply posted on 12-3-2010 @ 08:31 PM by pteridine
reply to post by SideWynder



The SIG P230 was made in .32ACP and .380 and looks like SIG's version of the PPK; the P239 in .40 and 9mm is what you are thinking of. The Walther PPS is more readily concealed and has a better trigger out of the box.


reply posted on 13-3-2010 @ 05:55 AM by SideWynder
reply to post by pteridine



Thank you for catching my mistake, I had both models, one in .40 and the 230 in .32... even when I had both I used to get the nomenclature mixed up when talking about them... too similar in the model designation..


reply posted on 13-3-2010 @ 06:00 AM by SideWynder
reply to post by captaintyinknots



Sorry, the only sigs, I am familiar with were the two that I had years ago, a p230, and a p239,, But I was impressed with both.. never had a missfeed or jam, once they got used a bit they were pretty easy to break down and clean..(everything was stiff, till after about 150 rounds, and 3 cleanings)..

I personally, usually just stick with my old colt 1911a1 nowadays, It is just something that I have several decades of experiance with, so I am very comfortable with it.. I have several other handguns just sitting in the safe, haven't even seen the light of day in about 5 years..(except for "spring cleaning")

[edit on 13-3-2010 by SideWynder]


reply posted on 13-3-2010 @ 02:27 PM by MikeNice81
reply to post by pteridine



Bersa still makes the Thunder 380 and has even added the Thunder 380 Concealed Carry to their line up. Both are reliable and cost effective.


reply posted on 15-3-2010 @ 01:13 PM by MikeNice81
Since the OP stated he was probably going to chose a 9mm I wanted to throw this in for his consideration.

Bersa makes a "Thunder 9mm" that sales for between $300 and $400 brand new.

Genitron.Com Handgun Database Page For Bersa Thunder 9mm

Taurus has started making the "Slim" 9mm. From the review in American Rifleman it seems to be a good gun. It is built simple and comes with a thumb safety to make locked and loaded carrying safer. I saw one new in the box for $415 over the weekend.

Genitron Page For Taurus Slim

I haven't seen an a brand new SIG, H&K, Beretta, Springfield Armory or Glock 9mm retailing for less than $500 in a while.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 10:30 AM by Doc Holiday
I just want to add this, for no reason really, other than to say.
The rounds used in war times and in the early times of the 1911's and such "types" of guns.

There was not the newer technically modified bullets...NATO..thing rules of war and such...

So in that defence, I present this...
www.gunshopfinder.com...

I know, flame me for liking my small calibers, but even a .17 cal. ballistic tip gonig 2800-3000 FPS coming apart upon impact, that IMO changes the idea for needing brute knock down power, which in turn, also limits its range very fast and dramatically.

Myself I'm working on a 22 hornet version of a 1911 if all goes well...that would be a really hard round to compare with 9mm's 45 acp's...beings that @150+ yards I can put a tiny entry wound in you witth a mega, trauma inducing exit or just plain old, make your inards look like grape jelly preserves.


reply posted on 21-3-2010 @ 10:40 AM by DaddyBare
reply to post by Doc Holiday



Hey Doc...
Ya know what they say about the tides of war???

This time the Marines going to Afghanistan will be taking a new round for their M-4's

5.56mm Ball, Carbine, Barrier -MK 318 MOD 0




reply posted on 22-3-2010 @ 09:38 AM by Doc Holiday
reply to post by DaddyBare



Thats better than FMJ IMO... and gives great advantages to our troops.
Just wish I could, let them use 3-500 test rounds of my .223 re-loads, I'm using ATM.
I'm using Sierra 69 gr HPBT #1380 part #, although not as extreme as the ballisti tip 75grain BTHP Hornady's #H2279 "part #" I use.....I find the nosslers are more accurate , but only by 3/8" groups @ 200 yards, vs. the just under 1/4 " groups with the sierra's...

I have not chrono graphed them yet, but by math figures they should be going 2800-3000 FPS in standard loads, and I have pushed them a few times as much as getting 3300 FPS....great rnd!



[edit on 22-3-2010 by Doc Holiday]


reply posted on 22-3-2010 @ 09:49 AM by DaddyBare
reply to post by Doc Holiday



Well the not so well kept secret about the mk 318 Mod 0
is in civilian life it's better known as Federals trophy bonded bear claw... a well tested and proven hunting bullet...
Not a true hollowpoint it skirts the Hague by a technically...

still much better than the ole ball round


[edit on 22-3-2010 by DaddyBare]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Show us your bow
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags