Just in case any of you still think that cops usually tell the truth to get warrants, here is a typical case that I though you might find interesting.
There is really nothing special about it, sadly, except that justice was done in the end and in many cases a defendant cannot afford to take the case
to another level, which is where most legal remedy is.
Many judges, and virtually all prosecutors, will ignore coomon sense applications of the law in order to get a conviction, and to keep a politically
favorable profile if they are elected, as most are. they do not care if you are really guilty; they believe that if you can afford the appeal and win,
it will be old news and will not affect their images in the press. If you cannot afford to appeal, then you simply rot in jail and justice is once
again slapped in the face and the Constitution trampled.
Take a look:
openjurist.org...
Here are a few quotes from the Appeals Court:
" There is no question that Officer Engle acted with reckless disregard for the truth in view of the remarkable inaccuracies presented in his
affidavit. Detective Engle by his own admission was informed by Deputy Keeney of Holt's tip within a day of filling out the application for the
warrant in this case, yet Engle implied in his affidavit that he drove by Hammond's property in order to verify Holt's tip in April. Detective Engle
stated that Holt informed Deputy Keeney that the marijuana was located in a "side room" of the building, yet Deputy Keeney testified at the Franks
hearing that he did not recall such a statement. Detective Engle stated in his affidavit that he "verified [Holt's] complaint" when he drove by
Hammond's property, yet he did not see any marijuana growing or for that matter any indications of criminal activity. All he was able to "verify"
was that a Glen Hammond lived in Rockcastle County off of KY 1955. Detective Engle stated with certainty that there was no trailer on the Hammond
property, yet there was a trailer. The power records were not for the buildings they were attributed to in the affidavit. The building that Engle
claimed to have no windows, did in fact have windows. This is not the case in which an officer made a small error in the affidavit, when applying for
a warrant. The number of falsehoods and half-truths told are substantial and reflect, at the very least, a reckless disregard for the truth. For these
reasons, we should reverse the district court's ruling and grant Hammond's motion to suppress the evidence seized in both searches.3
"
III
30
Hammond also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction under 18 U.S.C. ยง 924(c)(1). However, given our decision to
grant Hammond's motion to suppress, it is unnecessary for us to evaluate this second issue on appeal. For the reasons given above, we REVERSE the
district court's denial of Hammond's suppression motion and REMAND this case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
CONVICTION OVERTURNED!!
Now, because of bar police work, POLICE PERJURY, and no scruples, the State lost a case where they had a machine gun, sawed off shotgun, some hard
drugs...and some pot. They lost a chance to actually convict the guy because they preferred lies and the easy way to following the law. Can you
imagine how the cop feels? he has been outed by a major court as a LIAR, perjurer and criminal cop. Perjury is lying under oath, which is required for
a warrant application.
You might say, well, that is only one case..how many cops are actually lying on warrant affadavits? Hard to say with accuracy: Sadly no statistics
are kept on the number of appeals that are won on the basis of faulty warrants and rubber stamping magistrates, but there SHOULD be. I bet it would
reveal a nightmare number of cases, most done away with at preliminary hearings if TOO obviously false or insufficient, and the rest left to wind
their way through the system....wins for those with money for a lawyer, and losses for the poor.
Here is another case where the cops purposely hid information and wanted the judge to believe that they had PERSONALLY observed the defendant when
in fact they had just stuck a GPS device to his car and assumed all movements were him!!
CONVICTION OVERTURNED!!
web.courierpress.com...
From that decision: ' The affiant never mentions the use of a GPS device...why? Does the affiant want to hide that fact ?".
And here is a good case where the cops LEFT OUT critical info from the magistrate, but also knew that a dog had failed to alert and that they had NO
probable cause, but raided a mans home anyway...CONVICTION OVERTURNED!!
openjurist.org...
I could go on and on citing cases, but I think you get the point: Cops CANNOT be trusted to truthfully relate facts when seeking warrants, lies
are common, and if you are the victim of police perjury on a warrant affadavit, make sure your lawyer always carefully researches the warrant
applications and investigates to make sure that the cops are telling the truth...cops simply CANNOT be trusted ; if they will lie under oath to get a
warrant, they are no better than anyone they are chasing.