Originally posted by alphabet123
The government can access your phone even when the battery is removed. I am not ENTIRELY positive of the technology, but I do know that the power
comes from either the capacitors and batteries inside the phone, or uses transducers to pick up ambient and broadcast frequencies in the air and uses
them to power the microphone and outgoing transmissions. It works in a way similar to the Powermat charger device that has recently come out.
...
After this post, I'm probably going to destroy my computer, they are most definitely concerned with what I know about all of this.
I think you are just having fun with people given the way you ended your post.
What you say is untrue. None of the power sources you list are plausible. A cell phone broadcasting requires non-insignificant current. I've taken
apart many cell phones and I can assure you there is no extra room to hide batteries of any capacity. Further, there are no capacitors large enough
to store the charge you'd need, nor are capacitors best suited for this use. And the Powermat device requires your devices be placed within
millimeters of the mat for it to work, the ability to induce a current falls off exponentially over distance. And using a radio signal as a power
source is similarly problematic, the radio signal broadcast would need to be massive and would fall off so rapidly over distance as to be useless.
They are having some mild success in being able to transmit some power to remote devices but only be a directed microwave signal (not an
omnidirectional signal). If you were making a mild claim, such as cell phones can ping nearby towers for up to 20 minutes after the battery is
removed, through a tiny batter or capacitor, that maybe I could buy, but to suggest they can send audio for anything more than 30 seconds (through
some similar tiny battery or capacitor) would be nonsense.
John