Originally posted by jeffiriff
Who are all the workers that would have been hired to rig the building? Government officials or just regular joes? I guess if they were regular guys doing a job they could have been highly paid, or threatened.

Interesting videos though. Nothing too new coming out of them, but interesting still...

I always wondered that too. But ya know what?.....as far-fetched as 9-11 appears to be, whose to say the workers (responsible for rigging the buildings) weren't under some kinda hypnotic mind-control trance? Or....their memories were erased and/or were some of the tens of thousand of milk-carton people that mysteriously go missing nation wide?

I mean, is anything that far out there that it shouldn't be considered? Hey, I never thought my government would massacre my neighbors one autumn September morning but, they DID giving me, a whole different cynical take on them now!!

[edit on 11-3-2010 by TwoPhish]

I do not buy the statement this operation could not have been planned without many people noticing. If an operation such as this is planned over many months, or even several years, it could have easily been done in stages using small discrete footsteps, instead of large noticeable ones. Heck, maybe the purpose of the original bombing in '93 was to "prep" the building for this event.

Who knows? Maybe the buildings were originally designed and built in a way to be demolished in this fashion for safety or some other nefarious reasons. There are just too many variables and missing pieces to the puzzle to speculate what is and what is not possible.

It takes quite a bit more energy than just a pancake collapse to literally pulverize into dust two structures of such physical immensity. There is absolutely no way a pancake collapse could have virtually reduced a set of 47 inner core steel columns rising over 1,200 feet high into dust.

Those buildings were doing just fine after the initial impacts. To be reduced to nothing without warning just one short hour later defies common sense. And yes, these buildings were designed and built to behave in a predictable manner, even after adversity, as they did during the '75 fire and the '93 bombing.

A large commercial airliner crashing into a building of such imposing physical stature is certainly not a prelude to the catastrophic event some would have you believe it is. It appears the shock value of the alleged airliner impacts have gone a long way into making people think irrationally about the whole chain of events which led to the collapse.

The strategy is simple: shock people to the point where they are incapable of reasonable and logical thought. However, once the shock starts to wear off, the fictitious account which was given starts to creep into the stream of consciousness, where it ferments doubt.



[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
I do not buy the statement this operation could not have been planned without many people noticing. If an operation such as this is planned over many months, or even several years, it could have easily been done in stages using small discrete footsteps, instead of large noticeable ones. Heck, maybe the purpose of the original bombing in '93 was to "prep" the building for this event.

Who knows? Maybe the buildings were originally designed and built in a way to be demolished in this fashion for safety or some other nefarious reasons. There are just too many variables and missing pieces to the puzzle to speculate what is and what is not possible.

It takes quite a bit more energy than just a pancake collapse to literally pulverize into dust two structures of such physical immensity. There is absolutely no way a pancake collapse could have virtually reduced a set of 47 inner core steel columns rising over 1,200 feet high into dust.

Those buildings were doing just fine after the initial impacts. To be reduced to nothing without warning just one short hour later defies common sense. And yes, these buildings were designed and built to behave in a predictable manner, even after adversity, as they did during the '75 fire and the '93 bombing.

A large commercial airliner crashing into a building of such imposing physical stature is certainly not a prelude to the catastrophic event some would have you believe it is. It appears the shock value of the alleged airliner impacts have gone a long way into making people think irrationally about the whole chain of events which led to the collapse.

The strategy is simple: shock people to the point where they are incapable of reasonable and logical thought. However, once the shock starts to wear off, the fictitious account which was given starts to creep into the stream of consciousness, where it ferments doubt.



[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

[edit on 11-3-2010 by SphinxMontreal]

There is yet another 9/11 Myth:

When the Concrete was poured, the builders imbedded the explosives
in the Concrete. I think the Thinkers pinched this one from watching too
much Get Smart. Where Kaos was building all the Government Buildings
in Washington using Radio Controlled Exploding Bricks.

If you can think of the Craziest Conspiracy, It's already been thought of.

I must admit that I missed the gold removal from the WTC wreckage, back then I had a "job" that took up a lot of my time.

Even now I am suprised they would endure that much heat ( 1000+), just to retrieve something which could easily be guarded until the area cooled down. If I remember right, there was still molten and glowing metal present for several weeks.

Like I said, I don't claim to be real bright, but the more I learn the more questions I seem to have.

Originally posted by hdutton
I must admit that I missed the gold removal from the WTC wreckage, back then I had a "job" that took up a lot of my time.

Even now I am suprised they would endure that much heat ( 1000+), just to retrieve something which could easily be guarded until the area cooled down. If I remember right, there was still molten and glowing metal present for several weeks.

Like I said, I don't claim to be real bright, but the more I learn the more questions I seem to have.

Sorry to disappoint the Conspiracy butt....

The Underground Gold Vaults, weren't affected that much and access
could not have been a problem as they used large trucks

THese are the best introduction to 9/11 conspiracy ever made! The way he sticks to the Bush connections and lays out the key players is superb. He also presents the best evidence and covers quite a bit of ground in the 20 minutes.
Naturally there will be things we thought he should have included but the amount of information is pretty overwhelming and this makes it kinda concise.

Thanks Signals for posting this. I think this is the one the to make my parents finally watch, they're 80 but they still need to know the facts. I broke them in with election fraud a few years ago and I;ve never gone deep in discussion about 9/11 with them before. This video will help them to understand, it's not that they're stupid but they're from a generation that respected the government because it actually DESERVED respect.
Here goes the can of worms, emailing links to parents now...........