Conceal Classified Activities, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 41 times


reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 08:50 PM by Bedlam
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by tristar



Seems I may have a vague memory of those 'SAPs' in refernce to certain aspects of the UFO discussion.

As in, the 'Majestic 12' documents. Anything withthe moniker 'Majic' too.

Did my memory jump the shark on this, does anyone know, does it ring and bells?


I don't know about MJ12, (ees not my yob, mane) but this looks like the copy I have in the library, only older, so I confer my opinion of "aura of legitimacy" on it (waves scepter).

Here's some more trivia on this sort of thing:

1) A lot of times, but not always, you use another service branch for your "non-attributable" info. That is, if you are poking at a suspected USAP with a FOIA or at the county seat or whatnot, you will often end up 'discovering' that the phone system or security personnel were put in by the AF or Coast Guard, when in fact it's not them at all. However, a lot of people will stop there. I'm pretty sure I've seen a USAP talked about on ATS some years back that yep, you were right, that was a USAP, but you missed the nature of it when some of the info tracked back to the AF.

2) If it's not a service branch, the next most common thing I've seen is that it will track back to a large state or national utility, like AT&T or TVA.

3) If you've got business at a USAP they will provide quarters on-site so you don't show up in hotels. However, in that case you often see a lot of traffic at cleaners and laundromats just outside the USAP. You gotta get your stuff pressed somewhere.

4) Some USAPs will require you to recite a code sequence when you call, at least the ones I've been in. So if you call and go fishing with "May I speak with Mr Isuspectyouworkhere", you'll get an automatic no, whereas if you first said something on the order of "Please connect me to office 123A" you would proceed to the next round of suspicious interaction. (note that's not the usual format, just an example)

5) At one time there was a special area code (IIRC, 710) that you had to use to dial in, and you had to have a passcode to use it.

6) USAPs near military bases often use the base for other services. Thus you can occasionally spot the existence of one by looking in the AAFES insignia rack for unit paraphernalia that you know aren't on base. The difference between stuff for a USAP and some group that's secretly there on TDY is that the USAP stuff will stay out for a long time (look for dust)

7) Some USAPs operate 'in the open' under the aegis of a university, as an educational foundation

8) GSA being what it is, the cars you're assigned may not have GSA plates in order to be sneaky, but they're stock GSA fleet cars. So look for a lot of GSA looking vehicular traffic with local plates. They used to like Tahoes a lot. Forget getting a Vette or something.

9) Do not taunt Happy Fun USAP. If you try sneaking onto a SAP, you often get nice semi-friendly types like G4S, AirScan or MVM. At USAPs, you will often meet someone you won't like.

10) USAPs are occasionally cleared to enforce security measures outside the USAP itself, if the provocation warrants it.

11) It's a standing gag to speak to each other in something other than English when you're on security patrol or when off the USAP, to fulfill the 'not in the clear' provision. So if you see clean-cut guys in a laundromat with no accents that are occasionally speaking Russian or whatnot, they're likely to be SF. If they have handlebar mustaches, they're CAG.


reply posted on 22-3-2010 @ 12:04 PM by tristar
reply to post by Bedlam



Sound familiar

An inadvertent disclosure is the involuntary unauthorized access to classified
SAP information by an individual without SAP access authorization. Personnel
determined to have had unauthorized or inadvertent access to classified SAP
information (l) should be interviewed to determine the extent of the exposing,
and (2) may be requested to complete an Inadvertent Disclosure Oath.


or


Third Party Introductions.

The purpose of the Third Party Introduction is to provide a clearance and/or
access verification to other cleared personnel. The introduction is accomplished by a briefed third party, who has knowledge of both individual's access.


edit:



[edit on 22-3-2010 by tristar]


reply posted on 22-3-2010 @ 01:10 PM by Bedlam
reply to post by tristar



Yes, both.

You can end up with an ID just about anywhere, if they're not real careful, especially as a contractor. I have more than once backed out of rooms with my fingers in my ears and my eyes on the floor going 'la la la' when I was given access to the wrong place. You don't want ID's, they're pesky and irritating, since they assume you are untrustworthy.

As a side note, if you patent something, and they gag the patent, anyone you've told about or shown the material to will be hauled in and given the old ID treatment.

Also for the third party intro, yes, but don't believe it unless the interlocutor/go between is the SO or the project head. If John Doe, engineer SCI cleared for the project, surprise introduces me to Joe Snuffy, military guy of uncertain origin who displays credentials, I'm going to say "What project?" unless the SO has previously briefed me and shown me a photo.

edit: I am used to saying "inadvertent exposure", it's the same, just what slang you are used to. Changed "IE" to "ID".

[edit on 22-3-2010 by Bedlam]



reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 04:31 PM by tristar
reply to post by MemoryShock



Although active profiling of a targets computer does give an accurate account of his likes and dislikes.


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 04:33 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by tristar


Indeed. I was merely viewing the technical definitions of the highlighted text...


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 04:49 PM by tristar
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reply to
post by tristar


Indeed. I was merely viewing the technical definitions of the highlighted text...


Indeed, my apologies. But you must hand it to those fellow's, they simply do know how to work the mind.


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 05:45 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by tristar


Agreed. Eschewing Obsfucation is an art when using common terms...


reply posted on 1-4-2010 @ 12:39 PM by Bedlam
reply to post by tristar



MIKE FURLONG?!

Waitadamnminute.

I know that guy. There's something glitchy here. The description is similar but not right, and there was something Furlong was up to when I last thought about him at all that is ringing alarm bells looking at this. Maybe it's another CAPO also named Mike Furlong, but that doesn't sound likely.


reply posted on 1-4-2010 @ 12:55 PM by Bedlam
reply to post by tristar



I'll be shot. It's the same guy, but he's working for the AF as a COB, not in the AF. Ok, that makes more sense.

I ran into him in the Army and again at SAIC when we were doing some contract work for them.

"Rogue operator" my ass. "Got caught at something we'd rather deny" is more like it.

Hey, here's something to ponder - the joke around SAIC is that you can't tell if they run DIA or DIA runs them - there is a "public" face of SAIC and a "behind the scenes" one, and the lesser discussed one is a hoot to work for.


reply posted on 28-4-2010 @ 04:53 PM by tristar
reply to post by Bedlam



You more or less have verified your post, i guess any reply to your particular post does answer your inner intuition.


reply posted on 16-5-2010 @ 10:01 PM by Bedlam
Mad Mike rides again!

After the dust settled, it's back to business as usual.

This is yet another chapter in the ongoing nyah-nyah match between the Agency and the JCS/DoD.

For the last 10 years or so, the CIA has been tasked with a sort of ubercontrol of several facets of the military, including the NSA's affiliate military SIGINT groups, Special Forces and some branches of military intelligence, especially the HUMINT groups, through the Office of Military Affairs.

Who are a bunch of "female genitalia". OMA is very passive, and basically started sending only distance recon missions, very hands-off intel gathering and stopped a lot of the more intrusive SIGINT missions.

So DoD formed their own intel groups using contractors (often SAIC), and the JCS detached a large set of first tier A-teams from SF and put them under the DDJCS.

As time went on, the groups started running into each other in the field, and there was a little (more than a little at times) competition, whining and kvetching by the CIA over the JCS messing up their long, slow, passive plans. Which continues to this day, not always in the spirit of friendly inter-agency camaraderie either.


reply posted on 17-5-2010 @ 07:09 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by tristar


There is a lot more to connecting the dots then political winners and such. While the crisis in Greece is a major indicator there are other things happening in different parts of the world. Mexico just began mandatory RFID implants to combat the drug cartel in some government locations. Australia is pushing like hell for internet censorship and all the while, Banking Scandals are being publicized at an alarming rate relative to my experience.

Some people were very bad in the past several decades, me thinks...and what we are seeing, I think, is some major infighting.
edit on Mon, 17 May 2010 19:10:51 -0500 by MemoryShock because: For Clarification



reply posted on 27-5-2010 @ 02:07 PM by tristar
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reply to
post by tristar


There is a lot more to connecting the dots then political winners and such. While the crisis in Greece is a major indicator there are other things happening in different parts of the world. Mexico just began mandatory RFID implants to combat the drug cartel in some government locations. Australia is pushing like hell for internet censorship and all the while, Banking Scandals are being publicized at an alarming rate relative to my experience.

Some people were very bad in the past several decades, me thinks...and what we are seeing, I think, is some major infighting.
edit on Mon, 17 May 2010 19:10:51 -0500 by MemoryShock because: For Clarification


Hey Mem and to the viewers who are present.

As i have been afk for some time since i was placed stationed in greece way before any such crisis made public, i guess its more or less obvious that it was forth coming. So getting back on track, Greece does seem to be in a difficult position although i specifically use the term "seem". Although not made public unless your in a position to read specific news, it has increased its defense budget by 400 % in the last 3 months. To keep things into perspective the Turkish Prime Minister along with influential delegates did visit Greece and discussed issues ranging from Tourism to illegal human trafficking. What 99.9% of the citizens from both nations failed or should i say the news decided not to make aware of, was the fact that both nations increased and finalized acquisitions regarding defense and offensive systems that were specifically tuned to space defense systems and analysis.

But i guess this topic is an off topic issue as its way above the average reader let alone H20 entity.


reply posted on 27-5-2010 @ 02:17 PM by autowrench
reply to post by Smell The Roses



In my considered opinion, this is true, our government as we see it is just a puppet, their masters are in another dimension. A lot of us know this, but cannot prove it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 15 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 9 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 11 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 16 days ago with 57 member flags