It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can anyone here show me one war where there were not interrogations or 'torture'? Anyone? I think many of you do not realize the brutalities of war. You want to convict Bush of the same things you ignore that every world leader that has ever presided over a war has done and authorized. It shows the hypocrisy, illogical and intellectual dishonesty of this movement and the people involved in it.
Originally posted by jam321
If we can give the Gitmo guys rights, how about giving our President his rights.
But he never gave them their rights.
So why should we give him his?
actually this is still happening under the current administration, and shipped them off and just started torturing them with no good evidence.
Originally posted by jam321
But he never gave them their rights.
So why should we give him his?
Does two wrongs make a right?
Does that mean Obama is a criminal as well?
That's the whole issue. He abducted them from foreign countries, actually this is still happening under the current administration, and shipped them off and just started torturing them with no good evidence.
Turn off the CNN and the FOX and stop listening to Hannity. They are killing your brain.
Again, you people who think this is a partisan issue for me, just the fact that you still buy into partisan politics at all frankly disgusts me.
Again, you people who think this is a partisan issue for me, just the fact that you still buy into partisan politics at all frankly disgusts me. Turn off the CNN and the FOX and stop listening to Hannity. They are killing your brain.
There is enough evidence to convict Bush of murder.
He further states that any of the 50 state attorneys general, as well as any district attorney in the United States, has ample grounds to indict Bush for the murder of any soldier or soldiers who live in their state or county. (CounterPunch, 2008-05-28)
The reason behind any torture during war is to extract information (or really effed up psyops but thats besides the point) anyway well torture is a necessary evil do you know how to effectivley coerce your enemy into just telling you vital information that might be useful in saving lives and ENDING wars I know I dont know of another way
Originally posted by jam321
I would just hate that people could call me a criminal without due process.
Originally posted by CRASHPROJECT
Therefore, Bugliosi argues, the deaths of over 4,000 American soldiers and 100,000 Iraqi civilians since hostilities began (as of spring 2008)
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by bsbray11
GWB is a war criminal, endorsed torture along with Dick Cheney, etc.
In your fantasy world perhaps, however in the real world courts decide guilt or innocence - and we can see how you hate that fact!
Unfortunantly in this real world half the courts are too corrupt and the other half are too scared to bring this man to justice.
But even if what you say is true, it still does not give any of you the right to claim anyone else is a criminal.
Turn it around. What if someone else decides just on their whim to declare YOU a criminal.
See the slippery slope you are creating just because you hate Bush?
Is it possible that maybe President Bush was misled and unintentionally misled congress just for the sake of asking is their irrefutable proof to the contrary?
Originally posted by jam321
Not one of you people and it's not partisan for me.
I would just hate that people could call me a criminal without due process.
I do however think the Canadian had a pair, good for him. I think it's kinda cool that he attempted it.