Citizen's Arrest of Alleged War Criminal George W. Bush in Canada , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 73 times
Topic started on 8-3-2010 @ 05:52 PM by December_Rain

Citizen's Arrest of Alleged War Criminal George W. Bush in Canada


www.globalresearch.ca
Splitting the Sky, indigenous activist, seized by security forces in Canada last year when he attempted to make a citizen's arrest of George W. Bush will have his day in court on Monday, March 8th. According to Professor Anthony J. Hall, this case will demonstrate whether Canada is ruled by law or fear and highlight the need for new principles, the Calgary Principles to amend the victor's justice of the Nuremberg Principles, in light of the new impunities for high level crimes against humanity and the Earth in this era, and the need to protect and honor civil resistance to those high crimes.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 05:52 PM by December_Rain
Prior to Bush’s visit, the Canadian group Lawyers Against the War asked Canadian officials to bar entry or try Bush for his suspected crimes since Canadian Law prohibits “people suspected of any involvement in torture or other war crimes and crimes against humanity from entering Canada for any period and for any purpose. The most recent report of the War Crimes Program affirms the necessity of barring war crimes suspects from Canada: ‘The most effective way to deny safe haven to people involved or complicit in war crimes or crimes against humanity is to prevent them from coming to Canada.’”

Lawyers Against the War and protestors implored the government to do their duty and arrest Bush. “Dac” was carrying papers detailing the evidence against George W. Bush, which he had planned to serve him with on behalf of the victims and the people of the world, and he raised his hands to show that he was “non-violent.” Dac was then thrown down, stomped on, kicked, handcuffed and led off to be brutalized in a Calgary jail.


I will be closely watching his trial as the outcome may affect any future visit of Bush to foreign countries. Bravo!! to this many..no matter how much one appreciates him it's not enough. The article states it accurately
“Dac” has consciously taken a leadership role to politically challenge the powerful forces that dominate the North American continent. Brutally arrested for his action, he earned his “day in court” to voice not only his defense, but “to highlight the hypocrisy and criminality of the Canadian government for allowing Bush into Canada, and to firmly establish the legal defense of ‘civil resistance’, the duty of citizens to act when our governments and their agents are derelict in their duty. This will be very useful in the future to rein these criminals in.”


www.globalresearch.ca
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 08:25 PM by Agit8dChop
reply to post by Bushido Kanji



He is not a war criminal, he just went to war


Thats a very fine line.

I mean, lets say I was the leader of Australia, and I launched a war on, New Zealand.
So long as I presented my evidence that New Zealand was responsible for.. over populating the sheep population in Australia,
so long as I only used, regular munitions, and so long as I only locked up and waterboarded new zealanders who killed my invading soldiers...

Is that 'just a war' not a 'war crime' ?

The problem in todays world, or more so in this particular instance, is the man the Canadians are accusing of being a war criminal, has single handedly shifted the line to which a war criminal is based on.

Just because GW Bush and Cheney say they arent war criminals, and cant be prosecuted as such means as much as a fart in the wind.

If Hitler had of said in 1944 he wasnt a war criminal and cant be convicted as one, do you really think the Allies WOULDNT of pushed ahead with nuremburg?

Lets face it, the only reason GW isnt hanging in gallows with dick by his side, is because he was the American President, had he of been the president of some 3rd world country, he would of been taken out the back and shot after 911.


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 08:35 PM by tooo many pills
reply to post by Bushido Kanji



Good luck getting him there. It isn't like Nuremberg. GWB hasn't lost a war.
Obama will though.
Is he a war criminal too? No, he is a socialist.


Wow, how do kids always manage to bring Obama into the discussion? Some people are borderline obsessive. Stop watching FAUX!


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 08:38 PM by dereks
Originally posted by Unity_99
His illegal war broke the geneva convention.


Care to point out exactly which convention/paragraph his war broke?
en.wikipedia.org...

The contracts he signed are crimes and his signature no less an admission of guilt


Exactly which contracts are you on about?

Futhermore, using depleted uranium has already been declared by the UN a weapon of mass destruction.


When and exactly did the UN declare that, which resolution was it done under?

Legally, anyone who sees him and does not perform a citizens arrest is in violation of international law.


Exactly which "international law" would that be exactly?

and that crimes are committed not when a judge deams they are, but when they are thought of


so we now have thought crimes, just thinking something can make you guilty....

And he is a war criminal.


So when and in which court was he convicted?
Exactly what has he been convicted of?


reply posted on 8-3-2010 @ 08:42 PM by Bushido Kanji
reply to post by tooo many pills



If you had the ability to read between the lines you would have noticed that I was making fun of those who hate on all things American, especially American leaders.

I don't watch MSM any more than you do.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 3 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 10 days ago with 37 member flags