It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by goddogo1
Ok, Do you even know what Udumbara is? No, i thought so! Its a fig tree, and the flower lies within the fruit itself. So this lady has a huge fruit bearing tree under her washing machine! Now thats a miracle! here is link make shure you scroll down to the Buddhism part of the article, for some reason this one link takes you to another fig tree article. Just bare with the link and scroll down to the Buddhism part and hit that link! thanks! en.wikipedia.org...(Buddhism) please read for your own enlightenment! make shure you read the whole article, its good
[edit on 8pm3 30 200 by goddogo1]
[edit on 8pm3 30 200 by goddogo1]
[edit on 8pm3 30 200 by goddogo1]
Originally posted by shagreen heart
so how did they distinguish the two 3,000 years ago?
unless these lacewings only lay eggs every 3,000 years also (and they don't), there must be a way to tell the difference.
[edit on 8-3-2010 by shagreen heart]
Originally posted by djusdjus
Originally posted by genius/idoit
I am no Botanist but this is cool!
A Chinese nun has found an Udumbara flower, which Buddhist legend holds blossoms every 3,000 years, growing under her washing machine. The flower was found in the home of a Chinese nun in Lushan Mountain in Jiangxi province. The Udumbara - apparently Sanskrit for an auspicious flower from heaven' - measures just 1 mm in diameter and is said to find mentions in Buddhist mythology on account of its supposed rarity.
link
ok, so can there please be a botanists report? Looks like typical spores and not to mention, Buddhism is only 2500 years old approximately, so the botany records go back 500 years before that?
a 3000 year cycle of blossom recorded by a religion that is not 3000 years old.
No botany report, just a buddhist in the outback somewhere claiming spores on the bottom of his washing machine are a sign of something?
Can we please be more absurd? lol
Originally posted by shagreen heart
so how did they distinguish the two 3,000 years ago?
[edit on 8-3-2010 by shagreen heart]
The flower was said to bloom only once every 3,000 years, and thus came to symbolize events of rare occurrence.
As the Buddhas of the three periods of time
In such a manner spoke the Dharma,
So do I likewise now expound
The undiscriminated Dharma.
All Buddhas come into the world
But rarely, and are hard to meet;
And when they appear in the world,
It’s hard for them to speak the Dharma.
Throughtout countless ages, too,
It’s difficult to hear this Dharma.
And those who can hear this Dharma--
Such people too, are rare,
Like the udumbara flower,
In which all take delight,
Which the gods and humans prize,
For it blooms but once in a long, long time.
So one who hears this Dharma, gives joyful praise,
With even just a single word,
Has thereby made offerings,
To all the Buddhas of the three periods of time.
Such people are extremely rare.
Rarer than the udumbara flower.
All of you should have no doubts,
For I am the Dharma King;
I declare to the assembly:
I use only the path of One Vehicle,
To teach and transform Bodhisattvas.
There are no Sound Hearer Disciples.
Shariputra, all of you,
the Sound Hearers and Bodhisattvas,
Should know that this wondrous Dharma
Is the secret essence of all Buddhas
A Chinese nun has found an Udumbara flower, which Buddhist legend holds blossoms every 3,000 years, growing under her washing machine(...)
The Udumbara - apparently Sanskrit for an auspicious flower from heaven'
Originally posted by Smell The Roses
Originally posted by indigothefish
Some biologists claim the plants found in Korea are actually eggs of lacewings, an insect. But in Korea with a quarter of the population being Buddhists, people believe that they are the legendary Udumbara that appear every three thousand years.
source
pic of the 3000 year blooming flower
here
pic of eggs of lacewings
here
you be the judge
Thank you for that. Honestly I would lean towards they are flowers but dang they do look strikingly similar
Originally posted by djusdjus
ok, so can there please be a botanists report? Looks like typical spores and not to mention, Buddhism is only 2500 years old approximately, so the botany records go back 500 years before that?