posted on Mar, 7 2010 @ 12:38 PM
Originally posted by Springer
We have two members openly declaring they are violating our Terms And Conditions of use by employing ad blockers and essentially free-loading off
their fellow members.
They are now banned for violating the TAC.
Hey Springer, whilst I'm all for the upholding of the T&Cs, especially in light of keeping the site afloatm I'm not sure that your action here was
We also get members here who proclaim they are from planet X and are here on a mission of Y as well as 100% predictions that never come true as well
as those from a higher plane and...well you know the drill. All talk no evidence.
Is it not possible that those 2 members who claimed to be running adblocking software were doing just that - 'claiming'?
Again I'm behind you here - but either let those who claim without proof all get banned or let everyone claim without proof and, well, get away with
I know I'm in the camp of ditch em', but I also know that claimers generate traffic for the site, and traffic means ad hits.
So claimers are just claimers and are entitled to their delusions which are unverifiable or claimers who claim something which you can't verify but
goes against your own grain get booted?
Which is it?