I have Questions for 9/11 Truthers., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:08 PM by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by Phlynx



Why would you think we would make another conspiracy?

That's to assume that we just do this for fun. I'd rather the idea that our government lies to us not be in my head.


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:22 PM by Mr Sunchine
reply to post by Phlynx



Great question, but we all know the answer. If the private investigation found that it was indeed terrorists, Truthers would say that they were forced to by the government or some such thing.

Cmon, Truthers are the same people who create things like nano-thermite or holographic planes as to how it was done. They would just make up new and more outlandish ways that the buildings were brought down to get around whatever reasoning the private investigation used to come to its conclusion.

There is no defeating the human imagination, so a Truther will always think they are right no matter what anyone does to prove otherwise.


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:28 PM by oldschoolsuper star
reply to post by Phlynx



the point of having the investigation is not only the closure for thousands of people but it also means the justice of the mutha f***a that did it. wouldn't you want that? don't you want the truth either way?

if a second investigation proves us "truthers" wrong, then wouldn't that make you happy? so why don't you want to put it to rest like me? i dont care if im wrong. i literally just want it to be put to rest.

a true answer no matter how harsh it is, is an answer. and once i get one that answers the obvious questions that most people are asking, ill be able to put it behind me....hopefully li


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:29 PM by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by Mr Sunchine




Yup,

Truthers just want to cause problems and make up stories and all believe the same thing

just like

OSers will believe everything the government says and all believe the same thing

both statements are false and insulting to their respective groups.


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:35 PM by Mr Sunchine
reply to post by iamsupermanv2



I am not saying that there aren't some possible honest mistakes in the OS, though I do think they are minor in the big picture.

There are four reasons to believe the OS is mostly accurate.
1. We all seen it happen on live TV.
2. The government is not capable of doing such a large operation without:
a. F'ing it up.
b. Somebody squealing.
3. There was nothing to be gained by the government in destoying those buildings and killing thousands of Americans. The cost in dollars alone to the economy makes it not worth it.
4. The risk/reward ratio is not in favor of the government doing this. Meaning the risk of being caught was too high, the punishment if caught would be too high, and the reward either doesn't exist or you could get the same reward in a way less risky manner.



reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:41 PM by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by Mr Sunchine



I'm not all crazy about the "Total inside job" part, I just think they knowing let things fall through the cracks.

Everything we saw happen on TV happened.

But there are things that don't add up plain and simple, and that's the only thing that makes me a "truther"

Sorry if I came off "snarky" I was getting ready for an argument, but it seems you have a cooler head then I thought.


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:46 PM by Mr Sunchine
reply to post by iamsupermanv2



So you have to ask yourself what is to be gained by the goverment in letting the attack happen? People don't generally do things or allow things that aren't in their best interests.

To be honest, I could see why the government might let Pearl Harbor happen, though I don't believe they did. I could make a case for why that could be considered in the best interests of the leaders or the nation to let that happen.


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 03:47 PM by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Mr Sunchine
reply to
post by iamsupermanv2



I am not saying that there aren't some possible honest mistakes in the OS, though I do think they are minor in the big picture.

There are four reasons to believe the OS is mostly accurate.
1. We all seen it happen on live TV.
2. The government is not capable of doing such a large operation without:
a. F'ing it up.
b. Somebody squealing.
3. There was nothing to be gained by the government in destoying those buildings and killing thousands of Americans. The cost in dollars alone to the economy makes it not worth it.
4. The risk/reward ratio is not in favor of the government doing this. Meaning the risk of being caught was too high, the punishment if caught would be too high, and the reward either doesn't exist or you could get the same reward in a way less risky manner.


Seriously dude,
I am not sold on most of what the truthers believe, but every point you made there is debunked in like 2 minutes or less of research...

I honestly think your joking considering thats exactly why people are screaming for a new investigation.

1) the TV machine showed us something that initially was shocking, but it was the same footage that made people start asking questions (especially building 7).

2)
a) thats the point...they F-ed up a number of things
b) ....To agree to this and be in the know would be a sealed fate...you go down with the ship, you never speak...and if you even consider speaking, you, your family, and everyone is dead
3) I dont even know where to begin there.there was trillions gained, entire nations gained, and absurd amounts of cash "lost" in the defense sector. Even the owner of the towers make a mint verses having to spring for the renovations required beforehand...oh, and finally, building 7 wiped away all those pesky missing dollars records...would show you where the 2.3 trillion missing dollars went, but oh well, building 7 is gone...guess we will never know.
4) your under the impression this was a potential governmental move more than a business move...why?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 7 hours ago, 51 replies