The Final Minutes of the South Tower - The flaming inferno, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 86 times


reply posted on 6-3-2010 @ 11:27 PM by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by ImAPepper



" ANY inappropriate comments, insults, topic derailment, or trolling will result in immediate posting ban or account termination.

We've received an overwhelming number of member complaints since the topic of "TV Fakery" splashed on the ATS scene a few days ago. Most of the member complaints are dealing with the trollish nature of the new member(s) promoting these theories, and a handful of supporting characters.

When participating with the members of AboveTopSecret.com, there are certain standards of conduct and cooperation that are not simply expected, they are demanded.

We seem to be among several sites targeted by a recently formed "9/11 Research" group who espouses a particularly provocative theory of "no planes at the WTC" and "TV Fakery."What we (staff and memebrs) have noticed about this group is that their individuals engage in what they hope is an IMPENETRABLE approach in debating. They appear to have have no REAL interest in defending or discussing their theories. Instead they use provocative ideas and inflammatory language ("shills" for example) to bait people into extended debates filled with intentionally frustrating diversions, insults and accusation. Their activity in ATS threads prove they are disinterested in fact, reason, logic, or evidence while attempting to portray themselves as passionately convinced of their own highly questionable positions. "


Just wanted to make Sure you got the Message ..............Noncompliance is Futile ......


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 12:06 AM by Granite
reply to post by _BoneZ_



Great video and OP. I never heard these tapes before in the context of the firefighters doing a great job in very tough conditions. Heroes...
This is daming evidence that fire didn't weakened the supports. The OS is falling fast...
When we get the truth out of people, there will be Hell to pay...

Imapepper is very worried by this...


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 04:52 AM by The Baby Seal Club
reply to post by thedman



Well edman, dereks, and (ahem!) imapepper. I take it from your stance that it wouldn't bother you to have an independent investigation into 9/11?

After all, an independent investigation would allow you to verify your belief in the 9/11 commission story. So what do you say; would you sign a petition asking for an independent investigation of 9/11?

It definitely wouldn't hurt your opinion...or...?


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 05:49 AM by MilzGatez
reply to post by thedman



Great post..... its very straight forward......

thedman. you really seem to know the WTC in and out........ let me ask you, Where are you from? How many times have you gone to the Towers?... I was born here in New York City, live in and out from the city... and only been to the Towers once and that was from the outside when I was younger and among like many other New Yorkers that you know actually were born and live/lived in the city havent gone in the Towers unless they worked in there, or around there, gone to school around there or made food or other deliveries in the building

so dont even lie about it just to make yourself seem like you been there many times and know the layout in and out, searching for blueprints and information isnt the same as to actually being in it...

I used to go to school downtown, only 15-20 blocks radius from the Towers, I knew students that had family in the towers,,, I remember that morning very clearly on Sept. 11th., I was right on the sidewalk watching all these cop cars,fire trucks,etc just rushing by to get to the towers .. so enough with the bullcrap

and as far as dereks, ImAPepper and as well thedman seem like the same ignorant person trying to pull of their bullcrap... i'm out and i'm done.the truth will come out,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Out with the old America and In with the New America... but first we have to help out the blind to get their sight to see the truth

[edit on 7-3-2010 by MilzGatez]


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 06:04 AM by trueforger
reply to post by andy1972


Andy Man your picture isn't loading.
For what it's worth.Now I go play in the mud.Outside.Beats being a one minute to go about to be dead fireman stuck at the 78 th floor wondering about the explosions going off all up and down...Can you hear me now!!!


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 06:14 AM by andy1972
reply to post by trueforger



Crap....i works from here dude...
Anyway, if ya all havent guessed by now, and the link doesnt work...the answers are .........drum rollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll............

WORLD TRADE CENTER 1
WORLD TRADE CENTER 2
WORLD TRADE CENTER 7

Yes the only three steel framed buildings to fall by cause of fire....HOW BIZARRE IS THAT....
Almost as bizarre as Alan Silverstein taking out insurance policies that paid DOUBLE INDEMNITY if damaged by terrorist attack.....BIIZZZAAARRREEE.

[edit on 7-3-2010 by andy1972]


reply posted on 7-3-2010 @ 06:18 AM by Semus
Why are you guys continuing to argue with these people that (according to you) are trying to derail the thread?



Here are my thoughts on the subject....

Each person is entitled to their own opinions. Each person is also entitled to state their case. Now, the OP started this thread and stated his case. Whether or not I agree with his case against or for the OS, he's got a right to post it. Likewise, if someone wants to come here and state their case against the OP, they also have the right to do so. It's called discussion. You might agree or disagree with the OP, but must accept the fact that he is afforded the right to post his case, which the OP has done.


Now...


State your case, for or against the OP, back it up with evidence (remember, evidence is not always proof) and move on. You serve no purpose here by name-calling, or intentionally trying to "derail" a thread.


Each side has the right to post here as long as it is a civil discussion. I am so sick and tired of reading threads like this (so that I can learn more about the events on that day) only to be interrupted by people that have nothing better to do than come here and name-call, prejudge, and simply slander those posting. That goes for BOTH sides of this discussion.

Keep it clean, keep it civil, and if you do not like what the other has to say, simply ignore it. Just because someone came here to discredit you does not give you the right to lash out at them.

Also, if they came here to simply discredit you or what you have to say, it does not mean that your post is garbage, and it does not mean that your information is false. People believe what they believe.

Truth is truth, no matter what form it might take. I urge all of you to calm down, take a breath, count to ten, do whatever you have to do to keep this civil.



OK, so as far as the original post is concerned...

You've stated your case, and whether I agree with it or not, I respect your views. I enjoyed the post, and I enjoyed the video. I am not convinced 100% that 9/11 was an inside job, but I give you my respect for presenting me with evidence.

(remember, evidence is not always proof)

[edit on 7-3-2010 by Semus]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 11 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 15 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 17 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags