posted on Mar, 6 2010 @ 03:01 PM
reply to post by Tormentations
What would be your ideal afterlife if you
were to say so for yourself?
Full consciousnes control over experience. Think of it as being like a lucid dream while in a highly conscious state. Add in mutual awareness of
others experiencing similar states. Also a complete removal of silly, arbitrary limitations like being unable to see through walls, or to smell
sounds, or to only observe space from a single point.
That would be a good start.
I know just about everone's ideal afterlife includes the
ability to have sex without giving birth to childlen.
Well, it would include the "ability" to, but because there would be no need for continuity of events. It would also be possible to have children
without having sex first, for example. With full conscious control of the now
experience, things like sequence and causality would be entirely
Sex gives a super supreme, natural feeling high you cant just pass
up on or want to opt out from experiencing henceforth.
...nor be limited to. For example, I think "sex" would be far more intimate with full telepathic awareness of the state and experience of the
I just know everyone's ideal afterlife would include some good ol' food too.
...mine would have the possibility of food, but there would be no need to eat.
I'd dig to name myself Satan
I wouldn't see much reason for names. No bodies limiting our experience, no reason to use sound vibrations to communicate...why have a verbal name
when the beings you're communicating with can be aware of the totality of your consciousness simply by focusing on you?
The guys alive I bet want endlessness of bisexual women in their afterlife.
Ok. But why limit yourself to women? Or humans? Why limit yourself to being the one having sex? We no longer have physical bodies in this scenario,
right? So it's not merely you being aware of your body having sex with another body. Why not expand your awareness to include the actions of, for
example...an entire species? If you like sex, why not experience it from the perspective of a unified species? Why not think up your own species with
more interesting sex organs than merely single digit into single orifice? Why not superimposition of form? Two organs touching in only three
dimensions are very limited in the amount of possible surface contact. So why not make use of a fourth dimension, and have sexual contact throughout
the entire volume of the organs involved? If we're going that far, why even bother to use sex organs at all? Why not simply share direct
I have no problem with a hedonistic eternity of self-fulfillment...but if we're going to do that, why not go all the way?