Theory of why we invaded Iraq., page 1

There is a conspiracy theory that Israel was the culprit behind 9/11 my theory can only be proven true if the Israeli involvement theory in 9/11 is true.

So 9/11 strikes and as the whole show plays out the blame is quickly put on the Palestinians, then it is put on Usama Bin Laden. He claimed he had nothing to do with the attacks and that there was a government inside the US government

But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:

"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."

whatreallyhappened.com...

So lets fast forward, we launch a war against Afghanistan to hunt for bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. It only took a couple of years until we launched an offensive against Iraq. But why did we do this?

Saddam Hussein was a member of the Ba'athist Party of Iraq. The Ba'athists are committed to a united Arab world, obviously this would be a HUGE threat to Israel.

The Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party (also spelled Ba'th or Baath which means "resurrection or renaissance"; Arabic: حزب البعث العربي الاشتراكي‎) is a secularist Arab nationalism/Pan-Arabism political party opposed to Western imperialism and calling for the "renaissance" or "resurrection" of the Arab World and its unity in one united state.[1] Its motto is "Unity, Liberty, Socialism" (wahda, hurriya, ishtirakiya) — unity referring to Arab unity, liberty to freedom from non-Arab control and interference, and socialism refers to Arab socialism rather than to European socialism, or communism.

en.wikipedia.org...

So now you see that Suddam was committed to uniting the Arab world into a single state. But isn't that what the Arab League is about?

Arab nationalism (Arabic: القومية العربية‎ al-qawmiyya al-`arabiyya) is a nationalist ideology celebrating the glories of Arab civilization, the language and literature of the Arabs,[1] calling for rejuvenation and political union in the Arab world.[2] Its central premise is that the peoples of the Arab World, from the Atlantic Ocean to the Arabian Sea, constitute one nation bound together by common linguistic, cultural, religious, and historical heritage,[3][4] One of the primary goals of Arab nationalism is the end of Western influence in the Arab World, seen as a "nemesis" of Arab strength, and the removal of those Arab governments considered to be dependent upon Western power. It rose to prominence with the weakening and defeat of the (non-Arab) Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century and declined after the defeat of the Arab armies in the Six Day War.[3][2] Personalities and groups associated with Arab nationalism include Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, the Arab Nationalist Movement, Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi, the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party which came to power in Syria and Iraq for some years and remains in power in Iraq, its founder Michel Aflaq. Pan-Arabism is a related concept, which calls specifically for the creation of a single Arab state

en.wikipedia.org...

Could you imagine what Israel would have thought when they see a possability of a united arab republic that encircles them? They knew the only way to stop this was to make the Arab League seem inefficiant and they did.

As Arab leaders gather in Qatar for the 21st summit of the League of Arab States, many in the region say the organisation may have outlived its usefulness.

From Egypt to Bahrain, young Arabs tell Al Jazeera they have seen its influence on regional affairs wane since Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

They say they are worried the league is unable to address the concerns and aspirations of Arabs

If one looks at their involvement in the US war in Iraq, the Arab League could have done so much more. When the invasion started in 2003 they condemned the war, but they didn't reach a consensus on how to assist Iraq during the invasion or how they could challenge US troops from occupying Iraqi soil. At the end of the war, all they did was launch a campaign for Iraqi refugees.

Geopolitically, it has failed to prevent or end regional war, and it has failed to bring different factions together within an Arab country, such as the Sudanese government and the Darfur rebel groups or Hamas and the Palestinian Liberation Organisation.

The lack of a real response to the second invasion of Iraq or any of Israel's more recent incursions into Arab territories are prime examples of the group's ineptness.

english.aljazeera.net...

Israel played the smartest card they could. In order to stop a unity of the Arab world they had to make the only system of unity seem inneficient, and a great way to do that was Iraq. All they had to do was get America to invade Iraq knowing that they would do nothing about the situation which would infuriate the Arabs and make them angry at the only system that is uniting them. This stopped all advancement of Arab Unity. Wasn't it convinient that Iraq was blamed for developing nuclear weapons, I wonder who came up with this lie? (Sarcasm)

So I have only 1 question for you to help me figure out. What was happening around the turn of the century that made Israel so affraid of Arab unity that they had to act in such a drastic manor?

[edit on 3/6/10 by Misoir]

reply to post by Misoir

---

I think it has more to do, although I do feel Israel also had their interest but more interest involved. Saddam sealed his fate when he decided to switch to the euro in late 2000 (and later converted his $10 billion reserve fund at the U.N. to euros) - at that point, another manufactured Gulf War become inevitable under Bush II. Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is in large part an oil currency war.

One of the core reasons for the Iraq war was this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they needed to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. The second coalescing factor that was driving the Iraq war was the quiet acknowledgement by respected oil geologists and possibly this administration is the impending phenomenon known as Global "Peak Oil." This was projected to occur around 2010, with Iraq and Saudi Arabia being the final two nations to reach peak oil production.

And common sense tells that US didn't attack Iraq because Saddam was a brutal dictator. He was a brutal dictator back in the days when US played footsie with him as he fought Iran. (Do a Google image search for Rumsfeld and Saddam, and you'll find pictures of them shaking hands.)

Along with the above stated reason Israel's 1996 plan had listed the first step to remove Saddam Hussain.

Third, with Iraq in hand and US bases there it will be more easy to attack Iran comparatively.

These two threads might interest you:
Documents Reveal Rapid Reaction Media Team before Iraq War

EXPOSED: Leaked Document Exposes Israel Manipulation Of US Public In Aftermath Of Iraq War

[edit on 6-3-2010 by December_Rain]

reply to post by Misoir

---

So 9/11 strikes and as the whole show plays out the blame is quickly put on the Palestinians,

The Palestinians were blamed? I thought they were Saudis.

I thought we invaded Iraq to exterminate a bloodline of reptillians related
to the Ananaki. Who incidentaly are at this moment entering our solar
system. In a couple days they will land, take over the earth once again.
Continue the egyptian dynasty of the Pharoahs here on earth. Declare God to be dead . Decapitate all Christians, as it turns out the Guillotines
were real after all.
But God is not really dead because the Ananaki having a sinful nature tend to spin some pretty long winded stories. So when about half the
Christians are decapitated they're in heaven gett'in all bitchy with God to aevenge their spilled blood.
So God returns about half way thru the Christian halocaust to save them and they are the ones the Bible speaks of who will never know death, because they will be caught up in the air with the lord. So shall they ever be with the lord.
From this point the battle of Armageddon ensues. Jesus sets up his one
thousand year kingdom of God. Every knee bows every tongue confeesses Jesus Christ is lord. The Devil gets tossed and God will dry every tear.

Or at least thats how I understand it.

[edit on 22-4-2010 by randyvs]

Massive US Military Buildup on Two Strategic Islands: Socotra and Masirah
  Posted 12 days ago with 57 member flags

NATO & CIA are Behind the LIBYA & SYRIA Massacres of innocent Civilians
  Posted 3 days ago with 43 member flags

Young Israelis and Palestinians Flash Mob for Peace
  Posted 4 days ago with 37 member flags

Why a war with Iran is necessary should talking fail.
  Posted 19 days ago with 32 member flags

Zionists , Stop the War Against Iran Now!
  Posted 2 days ago with 32 member flags

Zionist regime well within Iran missile reach: MP
  Posted 4 days ago with 25 member flags

Israel to UN: Tomorrow will be too late for action against Iran !!
  Posted 16 days ago with 22 member flags

Israel no match for Iran military might
  Posted 5 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: