reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
VneZonyDostupa, you seem to have been completely brainwashed by the insurance companies that want you to think premiums are high because of
malpractice. It's insanely difficult to sue a hospital. Before you can proceed, you typically need a certificate of merit that can only be given out
by a doctor that you have to pay, then you need hundreds of thousands of dollars for expert testimony. The hospital knows this and uses it to its
advantage by picking people over 25 and single, poor, etc. to push procedures on to train students. Because no lawyer could afford to help these
people when they have to foot that kind of bill, they only stick to the massive cases that are obviously going to win.
What the law does say is that your records can be refused to you for medical reasons. It's a loophole. For example, if your medical records were a
risk to you, a risk to your health, or a risk to other peoples' health. That's just in theory.
The best example of this is psychiatrist. They can put in your chart that you're completely insane and refuse to disclose that to you because you're
going to get angry.
I don't really buy that. I think you're more at risk of a wrong diagnosis or a failure to diagnose. It's far better for you to have your diagnosis,
in hand, even if you don't understand it. You can't blame anyone but yourself if you decide to play doctor on yourself because of it.
Hospitals will often blacklist you too. Getting your records helps reveal this pattern of abuse as well.
I know people who have copies of their blood work sent to their house, from the lab. They sign a release too. Why do they have a release if they
can't give it out?? There may be another exception however, for HIV or Drug status, but where I am, there are two check boxes explicitly stating that
you want that data to be released too.
My bet is they're being ridiculous. Contact your state attorney general and make a complaint.