excellent....the title is a bumper sticker....gives me an idea!!
Mod Note: One Line and Short Posts – Please Review This Link.
[edit on Sat Mar 6 2010 by DontTreadOnMe]
"In court papers," said one news report, "lawyers for the city of Chicago pointed out that 402 of the 412 firearm homicides occurred with the use of handguns in 2008.
"'Handguns are used to kill in the United States more than all other weapons, firearms and otherwise, combined,, Chicago Corporation Counsel Mara S. Georges wrote."
So let's ban law-abiding citizens from having them? That will make it better?
That's just silly. As an Associated Press story noted, describing the view of one of the plaintiffs, a former police officer, the only people "hurt by the city's handgun ban are those obeying it."
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by DaddyBare
Handguns should be banned.
No militia needs them and you can't hunt with them.
1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional muster.
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by DaddyBare
Handguns should be banned.
No militia needs them and you can't hunt with them.