It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dock9
If New Zealand had been to the west of Australia, it would put it in closer proximity to Africa than to South America, in which case, the Maori would have more in common with Africans than Polynesians
Yet Maoris are believed to be of Polynesian, not African, origin
Doesn't that indicate that New Zealand was never to the north-west of Australia ?
Originally posted by Dock9
some mild critical thinking
Originally posted by dashar
also i dont rember iceland being so close to greenland it seamed to me more in the middle just under half way to greenland.
Originally posted by Dock9
Yet Maoris are believed to be of Polynesian, not African, origin
Doesn't that indicate that New Zealand was never to the north-west of Australia ?
Originally posted by thoughtform
There seems to be a divergence of what the manifestations of a timeline shift would be.
If we, for sake of argument, agreed that a timeline shift had occurred, all empirical evidence would instantaneously change to the characteristics of the new timeline. So, requiring a map demonstrating the changes doesn't seem to make sense in the context of a shift. As well as, all understanding of traits, characteristics of people, animals, or things; all awareness and concept of these things will be instantly altered to a new timeline memory and reflect the characteristics of the new timeline.
Originally posted by sphinx551
Originally posted by dashar
also i dont rember iceland being so close to greenland it seamed to me more in the middle just under half way to greenland.
Oh wow! This is getting interesting and scary at the same time!
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a37cdb252b43.png[/atsimg]
I just opened Google Earth to look at Iceland and, wow, I thought, what is it doing so far north and close to Greenland? I never recalled it being so far north and especially close to Greenland. I think these "changes" or anomalies really do happen as we speak. To be honest, I really think that timelines are collapsing.
P.S.: I remembered Iceland being a little bit more to the south and a little bit to the west. It looks too far up north and a little to the east from what I have remembered. Looks "way too close to Norway" even.
P.S. 2: It even looks like the Atlantic Ocean shrunk or is smaller in size.
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by thoughtform
There seems to be a divergence of what the manifestations of a timeline shift would be.
If we, for sake of argument, agreed that a timeline shift had occurred, all empirical evidence would instantaneously change to the characteristics of the new timeline. So, requiring a map demonstrating the changes doesn't seem to make sense in the context of a shift. As well as, all understanding of traits, characteristics of people, animals, or things; all awareness and concept of these things will be instantly altered to a new timeline memory and reflect the characteristics of the new timeline.
If all awareness is instantly altered, why are people saying they remember something different? And why the position of land masses? Why not something like yesterday my pet was an aardvark and today he's a hedgehog.
Originally posted by Unity_99
I really don't believe maps have changed, exept our satellite images are better than the older maps perhaps in school classes, for small changes.
Originally posted by Tamale_214
I am not convinced of any of this. It just seems to me so much more likely that TPTB have been at least moderately successful with their dumbing down program.
Knowledge without reason is wasted
Reason without Knowledge is pointless.
tamale
Originally posted by sphinx551
Originally posted by dashar
also i dont rember iceland being so close to greenland it seamed to me more in the middle just under half way to greenland.
Oh wow! This is getting interesting and scary at the same time!
I just opened Google Earth to look at Iceland and, wow, I thought, what is it doing so far north and close to Greenland? I never recalled it being so far north and especially close to Greenland. I think these "changes" or anomalies really do happen as we speak. To be honest, I really think that timelines are collapsing.
P.S.: I remembered Iceland being a little bit more to the south and a little bit to the west. It looks too far up north and a little to the east from what I have remembered. Looks "way too close to Norway" even.
[edit on 5-3-2010 by sphinx551]