Noah's Ark Is (still) In Turkey: DISCOVERY !, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 85 times


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 09:59 PM by shagreen heart
Originally posted by DeathShield
reply to
post by Schmidt1989



And if you did actual research on the subject you would realize that their is biblical evidence that suggests that it was a localized flood. Scientists have endorsed this concept. Only literalists who read one translation of the bible actually believe that the flood was global.


lmao, thank god he's a journalist and anthropologist major and writer. he'll be very useful to anyone but himself.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 10:01 PM by TravisT
Originally posted by freetree64
reply to
post by TravisT



"with God all things are possible" and so it would seem, so is the story of the ark...
And then all of the animals just hopped out the boat, and went back to their regular environments? I mean, if most Christians don't believe in evolution, then how did Polar Bears or reptiles survive for 10+ months, without dieing from their regular weather environment/conditions? It doesn't even make sense, especially if they never evolved.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by TravisT]


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 10:11 PM by watcher73
Originally posted by JBA2848
www.squidoo.com...

Heres some more of the history of the site going back to 1977 when Turkey decided it was the Ark. theres also pictures of the graves, anchors, house and walls.


The picture on that site of the ark being carried from the top of the mountain by a lava flow is hysterical. Like wood and pitch dont burn in LAVA. No instead LAVA preserved the ship.

LAVA is melted rock right?


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 10:47 PM by SheaWolf
reply to post by DarkspARCS



Flag for the story, star for you. Great find!!

Thank you for such a wonderful piece of historical information. Many always figured their technology was a lot further along than historians and scientists suggested. It's great to be proven correct.

Edited to add:

Here is an interesting take on the "after effect" of the flood.
www.biblemapsandresources.com...

[edit on 3-3-2010 by SheaWolf]



reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:04 PM by OrphenFire
Originally posted by tooo many pills
National Geographic already did a special on this.
channel.nationalgeographic.com...-Videos/02241_00

Why didn't god just stop the flood instead of making Noah build a boat to save all of animals? He is supposedly all powerful right? He could have done it. He can't interfere? But he can interfere enough to tell Noah a flood is coming and how to build a boat...? He could have at least built the boat for Noah.

God must have caused the flood which killed everything and everyone that wasn't on the boat. Now why would he do that? That's not very nice, they must have been non-believers. That will show them!

You'd think god would have just told Noah to herd all the animals up, then walk up a hill. That solves that problem.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by tooo many pills]


Are you serious? Please learn something about the subject matter before you post something ignorant like this. You're the first one on this entire thread to bash God, and you don't even have any knowledge of the story that you are using as your example to blaspheme. So let me fill you in.

Of course God caused the flood. He wanted to destroy every human because they were doing horrible things. Humans were mating with angels and creating Nephilim, and God got pissed. So he wanted to destroy life on earth and start over, only there was a problem. Noah was a good man and didn't deserve to perish, so God spared him by helping him build an ark so that he could survive. And that's the story.

By the way, I don't even believe this story, but at least I learn what it says before I go and say ignorant things about it.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:05 PM by Snarf
Damnit! I thought we had already found Noahs Ark!

I guess i need to delete all of my old evidence....again!!

Good bye
Noas ark in the snow

Fare thee well Noahs ark that is conveniently located next to Noahs ark museum

And i suppose i should throw away that piece of wood from Noahs ark that i bought there....*sigh*

I Shall Miss You strange looking picture of noahs ark that looks like a labia...oh wait....thats the one we're talking about right now??


Oh well...We can say goodbye to that one next week when someone finds Noahs ark in the Congo.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by Snarf]


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:34 PM by YeHUaH ELaHaYNU
Here's a reproduction of the Ark of Noah based on the original find (producing partially petrified deciduous Oak wood) using it's measurements from the Bible:

777denny.wordpress.com...
seawayblog.blogspot.com...
www.genesisfiles.com...

it was noted and photographed by Soviet pilots toward the end of WWII -nearly 2/3rds intact at about 17,000' and another estimated 1/3 broken off and down the mountain at about 14,500'.

noahsarksearch.com...
www.stevequayle.com...

University Photolabs around the world got alot of LANSAT imagery revealing this set of objects was an anomaly (abnormality) not natural to the geology of the Mountain.

At such altitude it could not have been just a 'local' event (like the Black Sea flooding) but that being the best event recently verifiable and likely of great importance to the writing period -it is an endeared interpretation in Academic Scholarship.


[edit on 2010/3/3 by YeHUaH ELaHaYNU]


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:39 PM by Snarf
reply to post by YeHUaH ELaHaYNU



If Noahs ark actually exists and we have photographs of it

can someone PLEASE tell me why nobody has gone up there to prove it exists?

Why are we left with aerial photographs with clarity that resembles watching TV across the room from behind a pane of stained glass?

If evidence must be faked, then there's a reason behind it.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:43 PM by djmolecular
reply to post by Larryman






Since when is wiki a legit source??? College's do not accept it. It can be modified.
and it says, and i quote (on the right hand pic side):

"Durupınar, alleged landing site of Noah's Ark"

alleged.. ok... that is proof enough for me.

man... this has been around for years and balked at... and i am a christian


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 11:46 PM by DeathShield
reply to post by shagreen heart



How does that relate at all to what i said? I was stating that not all who believe in the flood story subscribe to a global flood account based on scientific and biblical reasons. As far as noahs ark is concerned in regards to this article; it looks more like a natural formation to me, even if noah did build an ark the likelihood of it surviving thousands of years sounds like a stretch to me.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags