Women banned from flight for refusing scan, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times
Topic started on 3-3-2010 @ 07:04 PM by SilentShadow

Women banned from flight for refusing scan


au.news.yahoo.com
A British airport says two women who refused to go through a full-body scanner have been barred from boarding a flight.

Manchester Airport says the women, one of whom is a Muslim, were believed to have been booked to fly out to Islamabad.

They then refused to be scanned, citing medical and religious reasons.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 07:13 PM by truthseeker1984
reply to post by SilentShadow



I have been against these infernal machines since they were announced. They strip away your dignity all for the prying eyes of un-educated airport security workers to see, and possibly save.

I have written 4 letters a piece to all of my state senators, my congressmen, and I sent one to the White House too. I am completely pissed off about these inventions.

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security."---Benjamin Franklin

I'm sick and tired of these big wigs playing the "terror card" as it were to enforce even more rules and regulations on their citizens. I bet you won't catch any of the Parliament, or the US Congress dead going through one of these machines.

Such a sick world we live in.

S&F For you, because I absolutely hate these machines.



reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 07:29 PM by Dock9
reply to post by SilentShadow



Exactly !

So much for tens of thousands of people in forums, decrying such invasions of privacy (idiotic scanners) !

Where are they when they're called to defend the 'freedumbs' they claim they'll defend ?

Two women refused the scans. That's it ? Two women ?

Where are the rest ? Sitting obediently in their seats in planes after obediently subjecting themselves --- and their 'freedumbs' --- to the scanners ?

Words are cheap, huh ?

When it comes to action, where are the 'freedumb defenders' ?


If 'terrorists' were even a thousandth of the problem the authorities claim them to be, there wouldn't be a parliament or water, electrical or communications system left operative, world wide

Or gee ---- are we supposed to believe that 'terrorists' suffer from chronic tunnel-vision and stupidity, and therefore only know how to bomb planes in flight ?


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 07:34 PM by truthseeker1984
Originally posted by Dock9
reply to
post by SilentShadow



Exactly !

So much for tens of thousands of people in forums, decrying such invasions of privacy (idiotic scanners) !

Where are they when they're called to defend the 'freedumbs' they claim they'll defend ?

Two women refused the scans. That's it ? Two women ?

Where are the rest ? Sitting obediently in their seats in planes after obediently subjecting themselves --- and their 'freedumbs' --- to the scanners ?

Words are cheap, huh ?

When it comes to action, where are the 'freedumb defenders' ?


If 'terrorists' were even a thousandth of the problem the authorities claim them to be, there wouldn't be a parliament or water, electrical or communications system left operative, world wide

Or gee ---- are we supposed to believe that 'terrorists' suffer from chronic tunnel-vision and stupidity, and therefore only know how to bomb planes in flight ?





I really hope that you aren't insinuating that I am one of these "freedumb" fighters as you so eloquently put it. As I said, I have written letters, and I have chosen to drive to a selected destination (stateside that is) instead of flying, because I will not support any company trying to take away my rights.

If I am paranoid, and you're not lumping me in with the rest of those "freedumb" fighters, my apologies.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by truthseeker1984]


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:28 PM by (C2C)

There is no right to fly on a airplane.
reply to
post by Carseller4



Part of of the problem. The plane is of the earth, does someone really need to own it and profit off of it... And tell people they do not have a right to ride on it! Maybe it should belong to the world for the people of the world to ride on as they see fit :p These scanners make me sick, you should have the option togo throught other security measures.
I won't be flying anywhere.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:34 PM by stumason
reply to post by (C2C)



Huh?

How would it be made? Fuelled? Flown? Maintained?

Communism is nice on paper, but it just doesn't work in real life. People have to pay for planes because operating planes cost money. You have no more a right to use another persons plane without submitting to their conditions, than someone does if they want to use your home or car.

Or would you agree that, as your house is "of this earth", anybody can use it freely as they see fit?



reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:45 PM by telfyr
Originally posted by stumason
reply to
post by (C2C)



Huh?

How would it be made? Fuelled? Flown? Maintained?

Communism is nice on paper, but it just doesn't work in real life. People have to pay for planes because operating planes cost money. You have no more a right to use another persons plane without submitting to their conditions, than someone does if they want to use your home or car.

Or would you agree that, as your house is "of this earth", anybody can use it freely as they see fit?



within youre believe system, no matter what it is.
there is an certain rule to live by.
it does not say to you that you need to live by one and only .
...


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:48 PM by stumason
reply to post by telfyr



That made about as much sense as a chocolate fireguard....

Care to restate your point?


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:54 PM by telfyr
reply to post by stumason



it only needs some understanding, to figure out what the meaning is for you.
i can say i meant this, or that, by it.
thats not why i typed it.

its something to think about.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 08:56 PM by jam321
reply to post by Carseller4



How does one define what is a right and what isn't?

Is walking on the street a right?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 11 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 7 hours ago, 51 replies