Just because something is untestable doesn't mean it's non-existent, it simply means we haven't figured out a way to measure something outside our little slice of fractal perspective yet. It's just as ill conceived as infinity itself, perhaps even just a trillion.

There are more than likely, universes inside an electron. Just as our Universe is most likely the same size to some other being relatively unperceiveable.

But really, if we don't have the capacity to test it, then why bother...when there are so many other more practical (and more the point - pressing) matters at hand.

Hmm...perhaps he should just get a good marketing team, and write a multiverse bible.

Just stabbin' jabbin'...

[edit on 3-3-2010 by lagnar]

Try this


Variabilistic Causality Probability Partiality Actuality = Decumism?
(Improper and Infinite Intergrals. The function f(x) = i1/2 x> 0,f(0) = 1, is defined on the interval 0<=x<+1. f(x) is not bounded on 0<=x<=1, that it is R-integrable on the range. 0
The question is what is the most nominal Fourier integral. And b11 =h1= bn1 is the current chemical restrictionary of its unitary matrix. the root vector would be x =fw formation.

is it a base 1 or 11 or both for the formation of 12 sided decohedron spectrial artificiality the dualism of the universe is artificial its not actually real whats really actual is only the stuff the existance outside of its porbable confines but not actually possible beyond a vector of .00000000001% a 1 in one 100 squared by 3 then multiply each 3 in a hundred 97% chance by one hundred trillion. so 10(with one hundred zeros after it that much that many potential universes).

Anything that's possible will occur in an infinite universe. An infinite multiverse also theoretically allows for anything that is either possible or impossible to occur.

IS our universe infinite or a finite universe embedded in the multiverse which is infinite?

If it is the first then Santa Claus really exists out there somewhere, if it is the latter then he does exist, just probably not in this universe, maybe.

Originally posted by bharata
IS our universe infinite or a finite universe embedded in the multiverse which is infinite?

If it is the first then Santa Claus really exists out there somewhere, if it is the latter then he does exist, just probably not in this universe, maybe.

Its called a perpetual multi-verse if you want to be technical. There are one hundred, hundred trillion potential ones in a honeycomb layer but existing in all vectors or locations. The honey comb layer - technically called the unperceivable wall of inertia( solid particulate mash of cohesion lattices). The inertia wall is on a orientation of 114 degrees at a natural variance of 0-1 either on or off the most basic state of any state of matter-energy.

This universe recycles itself every 100 trillion years through the process of electric polarsisation - you cant see the age because stars are the only thing you can precieve to mesure it but the universe completly changes chemicaly about every 250 billion years so you instrumentation would only be able to mesure it at that range. The only way to tell its true age would be to mesure the uv light particulate density from the source at zero one degrees using a spectrometer mesuring uv spectrum only.

The current state of the universe using the

formula Etk=hy--hy'

ion energy by the magnitude Etk due to the destruction of quanta of the elastic vibrations of frequency v and the creation of quanta frequency v'. According to duetronic mathmatics the current age of the universe looks like this

(S)(I)=7+T

S means spin quantom number of the electron
I means nuclear spin quantom number
7 means gyromagnetic ratio
T absolute temperature

37 trillion years old.

So we cannot really see or perceive if our universe is infinite, Just measure the the perceivable part of it?