Should U.S. Foreign Policy Get Religion, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 3-3-2010 @ 09:45 AM by ModernAcademia

Should U.S. Foreign Policy Get Religion


www.thecubenews.com
WASHINGTON — A God gap impedes U.S. foreign policy.
Religion has benefited from and been transformed by globalization, but it also has become a primary means of organizing opposition to it.

But we believe that if the highest ethics of religion are mixed with politics rooted in justice, the combination can be positively powerful and extremely effective.

Ignoring religion will doom peace initiatives
the recommendation of this report that the U.S. government incorporate people with a deep k
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 10:27 AM by FortAnthem
reply to post by ModernAcademia



I believe that to discount religion in our dealings with others is a great error. Many countries hold their religion as a great value and use their religious principals to set policy.

The US govt needs to at least understand other countries religious beliefs in order to better communicate with them and understand where they are coming from.

I have great problems with this statement in the article:


American exceptionalism makes us a role model for the world, and we can judge other countries and cultures on the extent to which they adopt our values.


It reeks of a dogmatism that the American way is the ONLY way and shows American intolerance for diversity of ideas. It sets up Americanism as a religion of the state.


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 10:28 AM by DeathTribble
I am not on the fence on this, and here is why. The entire so called "war on terror" is at it's heart a religious war (yes, oil, conquest, etc) but to Bush he was God's chosen and there was even a republican add during the election which stated that Bush had heard God's command to destroy Hussein and thus he did. Some of the most dangerous (to human kind) people in the Middle East are the fundamentalists and I believe the exact same thing can be said here as well. Religion does NOT give you morals, in fact religion is one of the few things that can make a "good" person do absolutely despicable things to their fellow man.

From Glen Greenwald's discussion on this very topic in "A Tragic Legacy":
" . . the idea of being a Manichean comes from this third century BC philosophy that – or religion really, that basically understood the world, [as] a never-ending battle between the forces of pure good and the forces of pure evil. And all human events could be understood . . . through that prism.

[Manichaeism is] a very simplistic idea that even early Christianity rejected as not appreciating the complexities of how the world actually is and the ambiguities, the moral ambiguities that characterize who most of us are in most situations. George Bush views the world and his followers viewed the world through this lens of pure good versus pure evil.

And it’s not me saying that. He said that in virtually all of his speeches. And when you see the world that way what it means is that if you’re on the side of pure good, as he asserted that he was and we are, it means that anything that you do, no matter how limitless, no matter how brutal and immoral, is inherently justifiable because it’s being enlisted for service of the good.

And by contrast, anything that you do to those on the other side is inherently justified as well because they’re pure evil. And from the war in Iraq to the torture camps and secret prisons that we set up all of the things that have done so much damage, I think that’s the mentality that lies at the heart of it."
wallwritings.wordpress.com...

Religion supports clan thinking, outdated morality, and a very simplistic world view that does nothing to aid in the understanding of the complexity of international relations. One can so easily say "God is on my side" (when if he not?) and thus what I am doing is right, no matter what it is. This is a very dangerous path, and one I believe could literally destroy civilization in a nuclear world. Morality and ethics are certainly necessary in foreign relations as they are in all things, religion? Not so much...


reply posted on 3-3-2010 @ 01:27 PM by witch_isis
reply to post by FortAnthem



Just wanted to point this out in case you missed it.

The part of the article that you referenced is under this heading

"We should start first by looking at what hasn't worked, and then don't repeat it. This includes, but is not limited to, the following assumptions:"

(Bold mine)



The person who wrote that opinion agrees with you, that we shouldn't be thinking that way.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The One Party System replaces the Two Party system in the U.S.
  Posted 2 days ago with 14 member flags
Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags
Wow! An amazing speech! Freedom is inevitable
  Posted 0 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 16 days ago with 1 member flags
With all this talk about possible voter fraud...
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags