Vaccines used to Lower Population - Bills Gates Admits

At last the truth about the Swine Flu and Cervical Cancer Vaccines is starting to be admitted. Sterilization

Microsoft founder Bill Gates told a recent TED conference, an organization which is sponsored by one of the largest toxic waste polluters on the planet, that vaccines need to be used to reduce world population figures in order to solve global warming and lower CO2 emissions.



Full Article

Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

Quite how an improvement in health care and vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates is referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

“I’m not sure what the nothing-to-see-here explanation is for Bill Gates’ theory that “new vaccines” can help lower the population of the world,” points out the Cryptogon blog, “But I thought about the incidents from the 1990s where the World Health Organization was providing a “tetanus vaccine” to poor girls and women (and just poor girls and women) that contained human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). For those who don’t want to delve into that, in short, it was a World Health Organization experiment; a test of a vaccine against pregnancy.”

After presenting an equation that included the number of people on the planet and CO2 emissions, Gates said, “Probably one of these numbers is going to get pretty near to zero.”

Later in the presentation, Gates mentions picking a vaccine, “which is something I love,” that would be used to lower global CO2 emissions.

He also advocates pouring more money into the global warming scam by way of the United Nations, as well as a “CO2 tax” and cap and trade, while making it clear that the developed world would have to reduce its living standards by cutting back on essential services that generate CO2.

Gates said that a 20 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions was necessary by 2020, a 50 per cent reduction by 2050, and ultimately that there had to be zero CO2 emissions globally, a measure that would completely reverse hundreds of years of technological progress and return man to the agrarian age, all in the name of preventing an alleged miniscule temperature increase that has been proven to be based on fraudulent data models in light of the Climategate scandal.

One of Gates’ proposals for reducing CO2 emissions is the use of biofuels, which as a new report highlights, has resulted in millions of acres of forests being destroyed, which ultimately means a net increase in CO2 emissions from biofuels when compared to fossil fuels, not to mention the massive devastation caused to wildlife.

As we have documented, a CO2 reduction of 50-80 per cent, not to mention 100 per cent, would inflict a new great depression in the United States, reducing GDP by 6.9 percent – a figure comparable with the economic meltdown of 1929 and 1930.

Additionally, the “post-industrial revolution” being proposed by Gates and his ilk would lead to massive job losses.

The implementation of so-called “green jobs” in other countries has devastated economies and cost millions of jobs. As the Seattle Times reported back in June, Spain’s staggering unemployment rate of over 18 per cent was partly down to massive job losses as a result of attempts to replace existing industry with wind farms and other forms of alternative energy.

In a so-called “green economy,” “Each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries because of the political allocation — sub-optimum in terms of economic efficiency — of capital,” states the report.

The fact that Gates would be so open in his call to use vaccines to lower global population (without a word as to the human rights considerations), probably has a lot to do with the audience attending his speech.

The TED organization admits that it is elitist, “in a good way,” and charges a whopping $6,000 dollars membership fee which must be paid by conference attendees. TED also charges nearly $1,000 just for its live conference web stream. The organization’s sponsors include IBM and military-industrial complex kingpin General Electric, which has a notorious history of environmental misdeeds, being ranked fourth-largest corporate producer of air pollution in the United States, with more than 4.4 million pounds per year (2,000 Tonnes) of toxic chemicals released into the air. GE is also a major contributor to the toxic waste problem, rendering its sponsorship of an organization that claims to be seeking solutions to environmental problems completely hypocritical.

Watch Gates’ speech below.

www.youtube.com...

If you want to get straight to it in the video go to 4 min 33 seconds, perhaps he's so used to speaking about it with the elite that it accidentally slipped out

He needs to get back behind his computer screen and stay out of health issues, politics, and global warming. He doesn't know a blasted thing about any of it and is by no means an expert opinion. He's just another of the rich, privileged class telling us peons WE'RE going to have to make changes.

Just a list of the transportation showing up in Copenhagen tells us that those people don't take their own advice.

Bill Gates is a computer guru and a genius in THAT field ONLY. His opinion on vaccines means diddly squat. His opinion on global warming is just that...his opinion. Not even an educated one (at least not on that topic). And what's he doing trying to affect politics?

It may be time for him to go back to his mother's basement. He's clearly out of his element in these arenas.

I think vaccines are for sterilization and depopulation, and when you combine Gates' interview that details his Mad Max vision of the future and the news of his 10 billion dollar vaccine donation, I think that's pretty damning...

However, THIS IS NOT A SMOKING GUN.
He says that vaccines will lower the projected population increase, not depopulate existing people. Their rationale, as delineated in "Common Wealth", by Jeffrey sachs, is that vaccines lower childhood mortality rates. By assuring parents in the developing world that their kids will not die in infancy, one lowers their desire to have more children to offset the potential deaths of their kids. Say they want two kids. If there is a perceived 50% mortality rate of children, parents would have to have 4 kids to reach the two kids that will survive. If these 2 kids do not die, due to random chance, they are like "extra" kids beyond the two desired kids. By assuring parents that their kids will not die (ostensibly by being vaccinated) they will voluntarily not have the 4 kids to compensate for the potential death of 2 of their kids. Hence, the reduction in potential population growth.

I think he's referring to is a trend we're already seeing. As our technology gets better you see a decrease in birth rate. Not only do we now have better forms of contraception, but also we're living longer so people are able to hold off on having children and can space their children out more.

The fact of the matter is. THe world IS overpopulated. A lot of people just don''t get it. They don't get why poverty exists, why people are starving or why real estate is so costly. As our population increases(humans) everything around us decreases; trees, wildlife, safe environments(non-toxic). I see us as the disease that needs to be vaccinated. stupid people need to stop making more stupid people. I don't know why people think that having a bunch of kids is the right thing to do, especially when there living conditions suck, what makes them think its gonna be better for there kids. It just pisses me off when I see parents with like 10 kids running around, like really? do you need that many kids? I really think there should be a mandatory license to even be able to have kids, you have to qualify physically, emotionally, and financially to ensure your kids are going to be strong. If you do not meet these requirements or do not have a license, your kid will be mandatorily aborted. and the only person you can blame for your fetus' death is yourself plain and simple. You can call this immoral, but the only immoral thing I see is the rape of mother earth by man.

wau good catch should be exposed